<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Lynn Sweet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008-07-16:/sweet/25</id>
    <updated>2009-11-20T21:54:21Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The scoop from Washington</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.261</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Six Illinois GOP House members snubbed by Obama White House on Gitmo North. Democrat senate candidate Giannoulias  gets briefing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/six_illinois_gop_house_members.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29578</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T21:43:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T21:54:21Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Guantanamo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Below, release from six Illinois GOP House members.....</em></p>

<p>All: Today, members of the Illinois Congressional Delegation joined Congressman Peter Roskam in sending a letter to<br />
President Barack Obama requesting a National Security Council (NSC) briefing, after one of the five Democrat Senate candidates, Alexi Giannoulias, disclosed that he received a NSC briefing in an interview this morning. </p>

<p>Pertinent background information is at the bottom and a PDF of the letter is attached as well.  </p>

<p><br />
November 20, 2009</p>

<p><br />
President Barack Obama<br />
The White House<br />
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW<br />
Washington, DC 20500<br />
 </p>

<p>Dear Mr. President,</p>

<p>In the week since your Administration announced its plans to move terrorists to Thomson, Illinois, Members of the Illinois Congressional Delegation requested a briefing from the Department of Defense, called for security impact studies and sent two letters calling for additional information.<br />
 <br />
In light of today's disclosure from Illinois State Treasurer and Democratic Senate Candidate Alexi Giannoulias that he has been briefed by National Security Council (NSC) officials on the plans to move al-Qaeda terrorists to Illinois, we are formally requesting a briefing from NSC officials in the interest of ensuring that the elected officials of the State of Illinois are provided the information needed to carry out their sworn duties for the people they represent.<br />
 <br />
Moving terrorists from Guantanamo to northern Illinois will have implications for the people of northern Illinois with respect to homeland security and lost economic opportunity.  To ensure the people of Illinois are afforded the utmost consideration for their safety, it is important to have their federal elected representatives apprised of the details of this evolving situation.<br />
 <br />
Additionally, we urge you to eschew the increasingly political nature of this situation.  Unfortunately, this deliberation has been tainted by the appearance of political favoritism given that one of the five prospective Democratic U.S. Senate candidates received a NSC briefing while elected Members of Congress have not. The people of Illinois will be best served by a process that forgoes the behind-closed-doors political approach and instead provides for open and transparent consideration.<br />
 <br />
Sincerely,</p>

<p>                                                           <br />
Peter Roskam                                                              <br />
John Shimkus                                                 <br />
Aaron Schock                                                             <br />
Tim Johnson <br />
Mark Kirk                                                                   <br />
Judy Biggert<br />
 </p>

<p> <br />
Background:<br />
 <br />
"Most importantly I had a chance to talk to the National Security Council folks." - Senate Candidate Alexi Giannoulias (WLS 890 AM's "Don Wade and Roma Show", 11/20/2009)</p>

<p>Listen to the full audio of the interview here.</p>

<p>(6:30 mark)<br />
 <br />
Roma: "Have you been briefed on this by the White House or since you are a state constitutional officer has Governor Quinn briefed you?</p>

<p>Giannoulias: "We've spoken to their offices, I've gotten some packets of paper, and I've read them. Most importantly I had a chance to talk to the National Security Council folks."<br />
 </p>

<p>(3:50 mark)</p>

<p>Giannoulias: "I've had a chance to talk to some folks on the National Security Council and they've told me that today, in this country federal prisons securely house approximately 350 inmates already including 35 already in Illinois and the U.S. military has demonstrated the ability to house those inmates, so I've heard some facts from them."</p>

<p><br />
###</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Senate ethics panel admonishes Burris, but no charges coming</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/senate_ethics_panel_clears_roland_burris.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29567</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T16:43:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T18:24:27Z</updated>

    <summary>WASHINGTON-- Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) was admonished today by the U.S. Senate ethics committee over his testimony in Springfield concerning how he got appointed to Barack Obama&apos;s vacant Senate seat. But his actions following his appointment by then Gov.-Rod Blagojevich...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Admin</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Burris" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="letterofadmonition" label="letter of admonition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rolandburris" label="Roland Burris" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="senateethicspanelinvestigation" label="Senate Ethics Panel investigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON-- Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) was admonished today by the U.S. Senate ethics committee over his testimony in Springfield concerning how he got appointed to Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat.</p>

<p>But his actions following his appointment by then Gov.-Rod Blagojevich did not rise to level of pursuing ethics charges against Burris, the committee ruled.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>"After an extensive investigation, the Select Committee on Ethics is issuing you this Public Letter of Qualified Admonition for actions and statement reflecting unfavorably upon the Senate in connection with your appointment to and seating in the Senate," according to letter from the committee, chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer.</p>

<p>The Committee found that you should have know that you were providing incorrect, inconsistent, misleading, or incomplete information to the public, the Senate and those conducting legitimate inquiries into your appointment to the Senate," the letter continued.</p>

<p>"While the Committee did not find that the evidence before it supported any actionable violations of law, Senators must meet a much higher standard of conduct."</p>

<p>Burris, in a statement, said he had been cleared.</p>

<p>"I am pleased that after numerous investigations, this matter has finally come to a close.  I thank the members of the Senate Ethics Committee for their fair and thorough review of this matter, and now look forward to continuing the important work ahead on behalf of the people of Illinois," said Burris.</p>

<p>Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), meanwhile, said in a statement the admonition of his colleague "speaks for itself."</p>

<p>"When we met with Roland Burris in January, we made it clear that in order for him to be seated in the U.S. Senate he needed to appear before the Illinois General Assembly to testify openly, honestly and completely about the nature of his relationship with the former governor, his associates and the circumstances surrounding this appointment," Durbin said.</p>

<p>"Since then, the accuracy and completeness of his testimony and affidavits have been called into question. The U.S. Senate Ethics Committee has completed its review into this matter and found that Sen. Burris actions have brought discredit on him and the Senate. The letter of qualified admonition from the Ethics Committee speaks for itself." </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-file" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/Burris%20Decision.pdf">Ethics panel's 'Letter of Qualified Admonition'</a></span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gov. Quinn dozing at health care forum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/gov_quinn_dozing_at_health_car.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29565</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T15:43:53Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T15:46:41Z</updated>

    <summary>The Dan Hynes for Illinois campaign likes this clip....posted on YouTube....of rival Gov. Quinn dozing during a health care forum with WTTW&apos;s Elizabeth Brackett....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="2010 Illinois Governor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Dan Hynes for Illinois campaign likes this clip....posted on YouTube....of rival Gov. Quinn dozing during a health care forum with WTTW's Elizabeth Brackett.</p>

<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uXDwW1lKf60&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uXDwW1lKf60&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obamas visit Sasha&apos;s school Friday morning. Pool report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/obamas_visit_sashas_school_fri.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29563</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T15:27:43Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T15:31:12Z</updated>

    <summary>WASHINGTON--No sleeping in after returning yesterday from an eight day trip to China, South Korea and Japan, President Obama on Friday morning with First Lady Michelle went to an event at daughter Sasha&apos;s school. Here&apos;s the pool report from Newsday&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON--No sleeping in after returning yesterday from an eight day trip to China, South Korea and Japan, President Obama on Friday morning with First Lady Michelle went to an event at daughter Sasha's school. Here's the pool report from Newsday's Tom Brune, a former Chicago Sun-Times reporter.</p>

<p>Pool report...<br />
President, First Lady visit daughter's school</p>

<p>Though still on far Eastern time, the president, and the first lady, made the <br />
trek out through morning rush hour traffic to Sidwell Friends Lower School in <br />
Bethesda, where Sasha goes, for a non-official visit. </p>

<p>A WH press aide said first couple were attending a school function, but would <br />
not elaborate.  Pool was kept outside, and walked to nearby shops for coffee. <br />
Visit lasted about 45 minutes. </p>

<p>For the record: Left White House at 8:30 a.m. Arrived at school in Bethesda at <br />
9:04 a.m. Left school at 9:49 a.m. Arrived White House at 10:18 a.m.</p>

<p>Tom Brune at Newsday</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Senate confirms David Hamilton for Appeals Court in Chicago</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/senate_confirms_david_hamilton.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29562</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T14:51:09Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T14:53:55Z</updated>

    <summary> WASHINGTON--After a stall, the Senate voted 59-39 Thursday to confirm U.S. District Court Judge David Hamilton--who now presides in an Indiana courtroom--to the Chicago based 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
WASHINGTON--After a stall, the Senate voted 59-39 Thursday to confirm U.S. District Court Judge David Hamilton--who now presides in an Indiana courtroom--to the Chicago based 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>President Obama official schedule and guidance, Nov. 20, 2009. No public events</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/president_obama_official_sched_171.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29561</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T14:28:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T14:29:20Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="President Obama schedule" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        
        <![CDATA[<p>THE WHITE HOUSE<br />
Office of the Press Secretary<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________________<br />
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
November 19, 2009<br />
 <br />
DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR<br />
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2009<br />
 <br />
The President has no scheduled public events.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
In-Town Travel Pool<br />
Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg<br />
Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP<br />
TV Corr & Crew: FOX<br />
Print: Newsday<br />
Radio: AP<br />
Travel Photo: New York Times<br />
 <br />
 <br />
EST<br />
 <br />
8:00AM          Pool Call Time<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
##<br />
 </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Oprah Winfrey to end TV show in 2011: ABC News reporting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/oprah_winfrey_to_end_tv_show_i.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29542</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T23:29:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T23:33:12Z</updated>

    <summary>Oprah Winfrey, fresh from a ratings hit with Sara Palin, will end her television show in September, 2011, ABC News is reporting. Winfrey, one of the most influential and richest women in the world has her Harpo Production Company based...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oprah Winfrey, fresh from a ratings hit with Sara Palin, will end her television show in September, 2011, ABC News is reporting.</p>

<p>Winfrey, one of the most influential and richest women in the world has her Harpo Production Company based in Chicago. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama home from China</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/obama_home_from_china.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29544</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T23:03:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T23:49:32Z</updated>

    <summary>WASHINGTON--President Obama is back in the U.S. after a swing through Japan, China and South Korea. Air Force One touched down at Andrews Air Force Base at 3:48 p.m. eastern on Thursday afternoon; by 4:01 p.m. est Obama was bounding...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Barack Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON--President Obama is back in the U.S. after a swing through Japan, China and South Korea. Air Force One touched down at Andrews Air Force Base at 3:48 p.m. eastern on Thursday afternoon; by 4:01 p.m. est Obama was bounding down the stairs to the tarmac. He motorcaded from Andrews AFB to the White House, arriving at the White House at 4:22 p.m. est.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>RNC Chairman Steele in Chicago; will meet with Illinois GOP leaders and 10th CD hopeful Coulson</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/rnc_chairman_steele_in_chicago.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29539</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T22:55:56Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T23:28:33Z</updated>

    <summary>WASHINGTON--Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, fresh from winning governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, hits Chicago on Friday for meetings in the Loop with Illinois GOP leadership to map strategy on Illinois contests for governor and Senate and House...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="2010 Illinois 10th House race" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON--Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, fresh from winning governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, hits Chicago on Friday for meetings in the Loop with Illinois GOP leadership to map strategy on Illinois contests for governor and Senate and House seats.</p>

<p>Steele will huddle with state Rep. Beth Coulson (R-Glenview), running for the 10th congressional district seat being vacated by Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), a Senate hopeful.</p>

<p>From Coulson: She  <em>"will join Illinois' House Minority Leader Tom Cross and Senate Minority Leader Chris Radogno, as well as Illinois Republican Chairman Pat Brady in the meeting with the chairman to talk about the upcoming midterm elections in Illinois and how to keep the 10th Congressional District in Republican hands."</em></p>

<p>Illinois voters have a Feb. 2 primary.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Below, Coulson release.... </em></p>

<p>REP. COULSON TO MEET WITH RNC CHAIR</p>

<p>NORTHBROOK (November 19) - State Rep. Beth Coulson, Republican candidate for Congress in the 10thDistrict, today announced she will meet with RNC Chairman Michael Steele on Friday in Chicago.</p>

<p>Coulson will join Illinois' House Minority Leader Tom Cross and Senate Minority Leader Chris Radogno, as well as Illinois Republican Chairman Pat Brady in the meeting with the chairman to talk about the upcoming midterm elections in Illinois and how to keep the 10th Congressional District in Republican hands.</p>

<p>"I welcome the opportunity to meet with Chairman Steele to discuss how the Illinois Republican Party can compete in many of the state elections and how we can keep this seat in Republican control," Coulson said. "I'm the only candidate that knows what it's like being in a targeted election and I believe my successful record as a fiscally conservative state legislator will be key to winning in November."</p>

<p>The 10thCongressional race has been rated as one of the top races in the nation this year following Rep. Mark Kirk's announcement that he is running for the Senate. Coulson is the only elected official in the Republican Primary.</p>

<p>"As many have already heard, I, along with leaders of the Illinois delegation, have already endorsed Beth in the Congressional race," Cross said. "Looking at the political landscape in Illinois, there are great opportunities for the party in the upcoming elections. Having been unsuccessfully targeted by the Democrats five times, Beth will be able to provide valuable insight into how we can keep the 10thCongressional District."</p>

<p>###<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Before Illinois prison sold for Gitmo North, State of Illinois must conduct  economic impact analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/before_illinois_prison_sold_fo.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29537</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T22:17:45Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T22:40:45Z</updated>

    <summary> WASHINGTON--Illinois State Sen. Jeff Schoenberg (D-Evanston) briefed me Thursday on what is involved on the state end in selling Thomson Correctional Center in northwest Illinois to the federal government. The Obama administration is considering asking Illinois Gov. Quinn to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Guantanamo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>WASHINGTON--Illinois State Sen. Jeff Schoenberg (D-Evanston) briefed me Thursday on what is involved on the state end in selling Thomson Correctional Center in northwest Illinois to the federal government. </p>

<p>The Obama administration is considering asking Illinois Gov. Quinn to sell the nearly vacant Thomson to the federal Bureau of Prisons, which in turn would lease a portion to the Defense Department to run a military prison for Guantanamo detainees. Sen. Dick Durbin is leading the drive for Thomson; Illinois House Republicans and Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) are against the plan.</p>

<p>Schoenberg is the Senate co-chair of the 12-member state Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability, which plays an advisory role in the decision.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>Schoenberg outlined the process once Quinn says in writing he wants to sell a state property. He said the state Central Management Services department has to declare it surplus; it has to be offered first to local units of government to see if they want to buy it; then there is an appraisal and then the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability looks at the sale to determine if it is a good idea.</p>

<p>The law calls for the 12-member body to have a formal hearing process, which includes a "detailed public examination of the impact of closing a state facility, including the economic impact," Schoenberg said. The Illinois Department of Corrections would also conduct there own economic impact analysis.</p>

<p>The commission findings are advisory and in the end, the Illinois General Assembly cannot veto what Quinn wants to do.</p>

<p>The White House has not announced a timetable for making a decision.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Illinois Senate President John Cullerton in Washington D.C.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/illinois_senate_president_john.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29535</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T22:15:39Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T22:42:34Z</updated>

    <summary> WASHINGTON--Illinois Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) met with members of the Illinois congressional delegation on Thurday on a trip here that included a fund-raiser Wednesday night for the state senate political committee....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Guantanamo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
WASHINGTON--Illinois Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) met with members of the Illinois congressional delegation on Thurday on a trip here that included a fund-raiser Wednesday night for the state senate political committee.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p><br />
I caught up with Cullerton, his wife Pam, state Sen. Dan Kotowski (D-Park Ridge) and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) as they were leaving the delegation meeting in Durbin's Senate leadership offices in the Capitol. Durbin was taking them to meet Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.) </p>

<p>The fund-raiser was hosted by former Illinois state Sen. Gary LaPaille (D-Ill.), now a Washington lobbyist (LaPaille hosted a funder for Gov. Quinn earlier in the month) and Bernie Robinson, a lobbyist and former chief of the State of Illinois Washington office.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Michelle Obama talks about her test taking anxiety</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/michelle_obama_talks_about_her_1.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29523</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T15:10:20Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T15:12:06Z</updated>

    <summary>On a trip to Denver on Monday for a mentoring event with high school girls, First Lady Michelle Obama talked about how as a kid she was anxious and nervous when she had to take tests. Read my story on...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Michelle Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On a trip to Denver on Monday for a mentoring event with high school girls, First Lady Michelle Obama talked about how as a kid she was anxious and nervous when she had to take tests. Read my story on this <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/11/18/what-made-michelle-obama-anxious-and-nervous/">here.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Like Obama, not his policies: Quinnipiac Poll finds disconnect</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/like_obama_not_his_policies_qu.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29521</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T13:19:20Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T13:21:09Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Barack Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Below, release and detailed poll data....</em></p>

<p>AMERICAN VOTERS LIKE OBAMA, BUT NOT HIS POLICIES, <br />
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS;<br />
SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC OPTION, BUT NOT OVERALL HEALTH PLAN </p>

<p>Three-quarters of American voters - 74 percent - like President Barack Obama as a person, but only 47 percent like most of his policies, and voters disapprove 51 - 35 percent of the health care overhaul passed by the House of Representatives which he has endorsed, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today. </p>

<p>Voters disapprove 53 - 41percent of President Obama's handling of health care.</p>

<p>Obama's endorsement of the House of Representatives-passed health care plan makes no difference to 44 percent of American voters, while 24 percent say it makes them view him more favorably; 30 percent less favorably. </p>

<p>Voters favor 57 - 35 percent giving people the option of being covered by a government-run health insurance plan, the "public option."  Independent voters approve 55 - 39 percent.  The overall approval is down from 61 - 34 percent in an October 8 survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University.  And they oppose two proposals to modify it:</p>

<p>•	Allowing states to opt out of the public option is a bad idea, voters say 49 - 43 percent;<br />
•	Voters also oppose 47 - 38 percent the "trigger," where the public option kicks in only if<br />
private insurance does not cover enough people.<br />
Given four choices to describe their feelings about the President, American voters say:<br />
•	46 percent like Obama as a person and like most of his policies;<br />
•	28 percent like him as a person, but don't like most of his policies;<br />
•	1 percent like his policies, but don't like him as a person;<br />
•	20 percent don't like him or his policies.</p>

<p>"Most Americans like President Barack Obama and might like to have a beer with him," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.   "But millions of voters who sided with him last November because they thought he would bring change to Washington aren't crazy about the kind of change he is trying to bring." </p>

<p></p>

<p>"That is especially true of independent voters, many of whom used to be Republicans turned off by the Bush years.  They may not yet have returned to their former political home, but many have concluded Obama isn't offering their kind of solutions," Brown added.</p>

<p>"The President's lower policy approval may be a warning sign for the White House that they need to better align their programs with the views of the American people, or better explain to the American people what they're trying to do."</p>

<p>The fall-off from Obama's personal likability to approval of his policies is greater among independent voters, a group Obama carried in the election.  Overall 28 percent of Americans say they like Obama personally but not his policies, while 34 percent of independents feel that way. <br />
"He may have won these independents last year, but he needs to do a better job convincing them that he is offering policies that will benefit them," said Brown.<br />
"The health care overhaul which passed the House 12 days ago gets a failing grade from the American people and so does Obama on the issue," said Brown.  "Independent voters disapprove 59 - 35 percent of the President's handling of health care and disapprove 57 - 29 percent of the plan itself."<br />
Overall, support for the plan drops as you go up the age and income scale, while the gender gap is significant: men disapprove 56 - 33 percent while women disapprove 46 - 37 percent. There is a racial divide as well: 68 percent of African-Americans, 47 percent of Hispanics and 29 percent of white voters support the health care plan.<br />
While this survey has bad news for the President, the news for Republicans is worse:<br />
Voters say 45 - 36 percent, including 40 - 37 percent among independents, that Obama is better able to handle health care than congressional Republicans.  In October, it was 47 - 31 percent in the President's favor.<br />
Voters also say 59 - 29 percent that Republicans are not making a good faith effort to work with Obama and the Democrats on health care.<br />
A total of 61 percent of American voters say it is "very important" or "somewhat important" that health care reform be approved this year.<br />
From November 9 - 16, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,518 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of +/- 2 percentage points.  <br />
The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio and the nation as a public service and for research.  <br />
For more data or RSS feed- http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201, or follow us on Twitter.<br />
 <br />
2. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Approve              36%     9%    68%    27%    31%    41%    31%    69%    38%<br />
Disapprove           55     85     23     62     62     47     60     25     40<br />
DK/NA                 9      6      9     11      7     12      9      7     22</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Approve              44%    36%    31%    42%    33%    32%    58%    44%    18%<br />
Disapprove           46     54     60     47     59     62     33     46     75<br />
DK/NA                10      9      9     11      8      6      9     10      7</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Approve              36%    36%    24%    26%    31%    54%    29%<br />
Disapprove           53     57     70     66     62     41     64<br />
DK/NA                10      8      6      7      6      5      7</p>

<p>TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job?</p>

<p>                                                             APPROVE......<br />
                                                             High    Low<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 6   July 2  Jun 4   Mar 4   Oct 8<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Approve              36      33      35      38      43      45      33<br />
Disapprove           55      56      55      50      45      45      56<br />
DK/NA                 9      11      10      12      11      10      11</p>

<p><br />
3. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Republicans in Congress are handling their job?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Approve              31%    54%    21%    27%    30%    32%    31%    29%    40%<br />
Disapprove           58     37     71     62     62     54     58     61     48<br />
DK/NA                11      9      8     11      8     14     11     10     12</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Approve              42%    30%    26%    32%    34%    28%    19%    28%    42%<br />
Disapprove           46     62     61     56     58     67     73     61     48<br />
DK/NA                12      8     13     12      8      5      8     11     10</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Approve              32%    28%    38%    35%    36%    15%    29%<br />
Disapprove           55     65     53     55     55     82     60<br />
DK/NA                12      7      9     10      8      4     11<br />
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Republicans in Congress are handling their job? </p>

<p>                                                             APPROVE......<br />
                                                             High    Low<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 6   July 2  Jun 4   Nov 19  Oct 8<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Approve              31      25      29      29      30      31      25<br />
Disapprove           58      64      59      57      56      58      64<br />
DK/NA                11      11      12      14      15      11      11</p>

<p><br />
4. In general, how satisfied are you with the way things are going in the nation today?  Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Very satisfied        3%     -      6%     1%     3%     3%     2%     8%     4%<br />
Smwht sat            27     10     47     21     25     29     23     49     33<br />
Smwht dissat         30     31     29     32     28     33     30     30     31<br />
Very dissat          39     59     17     45     44     35     44     12     31<br />
DK/NA                 1      -      1      1      1      1      1      1      -</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Very satisfied        2%     2%     3%     2%     3%     2%     6%     2%     1%<br />
Smwht sat            33     27     24     30     26     26     46     33     13<br />
Smwht dissat         38     29     25     32     29     30     31     36     25<br />
Very dissat          25     41     47     35     42     41     18     28     60<br />
DK/NA                 1      -      1      1      -      -      -      -      1</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Very satisfied        3%     2%     1%     2%     2%     1%     3%<br />
Smwht sat            26     31     14     19     25     52     25<br />
Smwht dissat         31     29     27     29     31     28     28<br />
Very dissat          40     38     57     50     42     19     45<br />
DK/NA                 1      1      -      1      -      1      -</p>

<p>TREND: In general, how satisfied are you with the way things are going in the nation today?  Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied?</p>

<p>                                                             VERY+SMWHT SAT<br />
                                                             High    Low<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 6   July 2  Apr 29  Dec 11  Nov 13<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2001    2008</p>

<p>Very satisfied        3       3       4       5       6      21       2<br />
Smwht satisfied      27      27      31      34      30      47      14<br />
Smwht dissatisfied   30      31      30      29      29      19      38<br />
Very dissatisfied    39      38      34      31      34      10      44<br />
DK/NA                 1       1       1       1       1       3       2</p>

<p></p>

<p>5. Which one of the following statements comes closest to the way you feel about <br />
Barack Obama - A) I like Barack Obama as a person and I also like most of his policies <br />
B) I like Barack Obama as a person but I don't like most of his policies C) I don't like Barack Obama as a person but I DO like most of his policies OR D) I don't like <br />
Barack Obama as a person and I also don't like most of his policies?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Person/Policies      46%    10%    83%    39%    41%    51%    39%    88%    56%<br />
Person/Not policies  28     40     11     34     29     27     31      8     25<br />
Policies/Not person   1      1      -      1      1      -      1      -      1<br />
Not pol/Not person   20     42      4     18     24     16     24      -     13<br />
DK/NA                 5      7      2      7      6      5      5      4      6</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Person/Policies      52%    47%    42%    52%    44%    42%    78%    54%    22%<br />
Person/Not policies  29     27     27     25     28     33     16     28     35<br />
Policies/Not person   -      1      1      1      1      1      1      1      1<br />
Not pol/Not person   16     19     24     17     24     19      2     12     37<br />
DK/NA                 3      6      6      6      3      5      2      5      6</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Person/Policies      46%    47%    26%    33%    39%    73%    37%<br />
Person/Not policies  28     29     37     32     33     12     31<br />
Policies/Not person   1      1      1      1      1      -      1<br />
Not pol/Not person   20     19     32     29     22     14     25<br />
DK/NA                 6      4      5      5      4      1      6</p>

<p><br />
8. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling - health care?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Approve              41%    11%    73%    35%    39%    44%    33%    79%    66%<br />
Disapprove           53     87     21     59     57     49     61     16     29<br />
DK/NA                 6      3      6      6      4      7      6      5      5</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Approve              49%    41%    37%    45%    40%    42%    71%    51%    17%<br />
Disapprove           48     53     55     48     54     57     23     43     78<br />
DK/NA                 3      6      7      7      5      2      7      6      4</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Approve              40%    46%    22%    28%    34%    60%    36%<br />
Disapprove           53     51     73     67     60     38     59<br />
DK/NA                 7      3      5      6      6      2      5</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling - health care?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 5   July 2<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Approve              41      41      39      46<br />
Disapprove           53      51      52      42<br />
DK/NA                 6       8       9      13</p>

<p><br />
10. Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Favorable            50%    15%    87%    44%    46%    55%    43%    90%    64%<br />
Unfavorable          38     72      8     41     44     33     45      3     22<br />
Hvn't hrd enough      9     11      4     13      9     10     10      6     11<br />
REFUSED               2      2      1      2      2      3      2      1      3</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Favorable            57%    52%    45%    55%    48%    51%    85%    62%    22%<br />
Unfavorable          33     38     42     32     45     41     10     26     66<br />
Hvn't hrd enough      8      9     10     12      6      6      4     10     10<br />
REFUSED               2      1      3      2      2      1      -      2      3</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Favorable            49%    55%    28%    34%    45%    72%    42%<br />
Unfavorable          38     39     60     53     43     19     46<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     11      5     10     10      9      9      9<br />
REFUSED               2      2      3      2      3      -      2</p>

<p>TREND: Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?</p>

<p>                                                             APPROVE.......<br />
                                                             High    Low<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   July 2  Apr 29  Apr 1   Nov 12  Feb 21<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2008    2007</p>

<p>Favorable            50      53      58      58      59      67      44<br />
Unfavorable          38      37      30      27      26      19      14<br />
Hvn't hrd enough      9       8      10      11      13      11      40<br />
REFUSED               2       2       2       3       2       3       1</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
11. Is your opinion of the - Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?<br />
                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Favorable            39%     7%    78%    25%    33%    44%    34%    68%    45%<br />
Unfavorable          46     80     10     56     55     38     52     15     27<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     13     12     10     15     11     15     11     15     25<br />
REFUSED               2      1      2      3      2      3      2      2      3</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Favorable            45%    39%    35%    44%    35%    36%    73%    46%    15%<br />
Unfavorable          34     49     51     36     53     57     16     37     71<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     19     10     11     17      9      6      9     15     13<br />
REFUSED               2      2      3      3      2      -      2      2      2</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Favorable            38%    42%    23%    27%    34%    68%    30%<br />
Unfavorable          44     49     63     59     52     27     57<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     15      7     11     11     11      4     11<br />
REFUSED               3      2      2      3      2      1      2</p>

<p>TREND: Is your opinion of the Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   July 2  Apr 29  Apr 1   Nov 12<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2008</p>

<p>Favorable            39      38      42      43      41      55<br />
Unfavorable          46      46      42      41      42      35<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     13      13      13      13      13       6<br />
REFUSED               2       3       3       3       3       4</p>

<p>12. Is your opinion of the - Republican Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?<br />
                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Favorable            28%    63%     9%    23%    27%    28%    30%    15%    28%<br />
Unfavorable          53     21     74     55     56     50     52     60     50<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     16     13     14     18     14     18     15     19     19<br />
REFUSED               4      2      3      3      3      4      3      6      3</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Favorable            27%    28%    25%    24%    30%    28%    14%    21%    41%<br />
Unfavorable          51     56     52     52     57     60     74     58     38<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     18     13     19     20     11     11      9     18     17<br />
REFUSED               4      3      4      3      3      2      3      3      3<br />
                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Favorable            28%    27%    41%    34%    32%    11%    30%<br />
Unfavorable          49     62     40     46     51     84     50<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     19      8     16     15     15      4     16<br />
REFUSED               4      3      4      4      2      1      4<br />
TREND: Is your opinion of the Republican Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8   July 2  Apr 29  Apr 1   Nov 12<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009    2009    2008</p>

<p>Favorable            28      25      25      27      27      36<br />
Unfavorable          53      53      52      51      52      52<br />
Hvn't hrd enough     16      18      20      17      17       7<br />
REFUSED               4       4       3       5       4       5</p>

<p><br />
14. Do you think the government should limit the amount of money that companies that are taking federal funds pay their executives?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Yes                  76%    72%    84%    75%    72%    81%    76%    80%    78%<br />
No                   19     24     11     21     23     15     20     12     18<br />
DK/NA                 4      4      4      4      5      4      4      7      4</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Yes                  76%    79%    76%    82%    74%    74%    91%    82%    65%<br />
No                   19     18     19     14     23     22      7     14     30<br />
DK/NA                 5      3      5      4      3      5      2      3      5</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Yes                  77%    75%    73%    73%    78%    77%    74%<br />
No                   18     22     23     23     18     20     22<br />
DK/NA                 5      3      5      4      4      3      5</p>

<p>TREND: Do you think the government should limit the amount of money that companies that are taking federal funds pay their executives?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Apr 1<br />
                     2009    2009</p>

<p>Yes                  76      81<br />
No                   19      16<br />
DK/NA                 4       3</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
15. Who do you trust to do a better job handling health care - President Obama or the Republicans in Congress?<br />
                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Pres Obama           45%     9%    83%    40%    42%    48%    37%    86%    69%<br />
Reps in Congress     36     73      7     37     40     32     43      4     19<br />
DK/NA                19     18      9     23     18     20     20     10     12</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Pres Obama           51%    46%    41%    50%    42%    47%    79%    54%    20%<br />
Reps in Congress     34     38     37     31     39     40     10     25     61<br />
DK/NA                15     17     22     19     18     13     10     21     19</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Pres Obama           44%    49%    23%    29%    42%    70%    37%<br />
Reps in Congress     35     37     58     49     42     24     42<br />
DK/NA                21     13     19     22     16      6     21</p>

<p>TREND: Who do you trust to do a better job handling health care - President Obama or the Republicans in Congress?<br />
                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 5   July 1<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>President Obama      45      47      46      53<br />
Reps in Congress     36      31      37      33<br />
DK/NA                19      21      16      14</p>

<p>16. How much have you heard or read about the health care reform plan that was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives - a lot, some, not much, or nothing at all?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>A lot                33%    36%    27%    35%    37%    29%    34%    27%    18%<br />
Some                 44     44     49     42     39     48     43     49     53<br />
Not much             18     16     20     17     17     18     17     21     23<br />
Nothing at all        5      4      4      5      6      5      5      4      4<br />
DK/NA                 1      -      -      1      1      -      1      -      2</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>A lot                25%    34%    38%    27%    36%    44%    33%    27%    38%<br />
Some                 49     45     38     42     48     45     46     48     40<br />
Not much             19     16     17     23     12     10     19     20     15<br />
Nothing at all        7      4      6      8      3      2      2      4      7<br />
DK/NA                 1      1      1      -      1      -      1      1      -<br />
                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>A lot                28%    46%    33%    35%    33%    45%    37%<br />
Some                 44     43     42     41     44     49     42<br />
Not much             21      9     20     18     19      5     16<br />
Nothing at all        7      1      5      6      4      1      4<br />
DK/NA                 1      -      -      1      1      -      1<br />
17. Do you approve or disapprove of this health care reform plan?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Approve              35%     8%    64%    29%    33%    37%    29%    68%    47%<br />
Disapprove           51     82     20     57     56     46     58     16     30<br />
DK/NA                14     10     16     14     11     17     13     16     23</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Approve              39%    36%    33%    40%    34%    34%    64%    41%    15%<br />
Disapprove           46     50     54     45     52     57     20     40     76<br />
DK/NA                15     14     13     15     14      9     16     19      9</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Approve              34%    39%    19%    25%    29%    53%    29%<br />
Disapprove           50     51     70     64     57     40     58<br />
DK/NA                16     10     11     11     13      7     13</p>

<p><br />
18. Does Barack Obama's support of this health care reform plan make you think more favorably of him, less favorably, or doesn't it make a difference?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>More favorably       24%     5%    46%    17%    21%    26%    19%    39%    44%<br />
Less favorably       30     57      6     33     35     26     36      4     17<br />
No diff              44     35     45     48     42     45     42     53     38<br />
DK/NA                 3      2      2      2      2      3      2      3      1</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>More favorably       22%    24%    25%    27%    22%    23%    48%    26%     9%<br />
Less favorably       24     30     34     24     34     33      8     21     52<br />
No diff              52     45     38     46     42     44     42     51     37<br />
DK/NA                 2      2      3      3      2      1      3      2      2</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>More favorably       24%    24%    11%    16%    21%    37%    21%<br />
Less favorably       30     31     47     43     33     12     36<br />
No diff              44     43     40     40     43     51     40<br />
DK/NA                 3      2      2      1      3      -      3</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>19. Do you support or oppose giving people the option of being covered by a government health insurance plan that would compete with private plans?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Support              57%    29%    82%    55%    54%    60%    52%    80%    70%<br />
Oppose               35     61     11     39     41     30     38     15     28<br />
DK/NA                 8     11      7      6      6     10      9      4      2</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Support              66%    59%    50%    61%    55%    59%    85%    68%    32%<br />
Oppose               30     35     39     30     39     37     10     24     60<br />
DK/NA                 4      7     11      9      6      4      5      8      8</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Support              56%    60%    43%    46%    52%    71%    52%<br />
Oppose               35     35     48     45     40     23     39<br />
DK/NA                 9      5     10      9      9      6      8</p>

<p>TREND: Do you support or oppose giving people the option of being covered by a government health insurance plan that would compete with private plans?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 5   July 1<br />
                     2009    2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Support              57      61      62      69<br />
Oppose               35      34      32      26<br />
DK/NA                 8       6       6       5</p>

<p><br />
20. There is a proposal that would allow states to opt out of a public option - that is it would be left up to each state to decide whether or not to give people the option of being covered by a government health insurance plan. Do you think that is a good idea or a bad idea?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Good idea            43%    46%    40%    45%    44%    43%    42%    45%    50%<br />
Bad idea             49     45     55     50     51     48     50     49     46<br />
DK/NA                 7      9      6      6      6      9      8      7      4</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Good idea            50%    43%    40%    47%    43%    36%    36%    44%    47%<br />
Bad idea             46     52     49     46     50     60     60     51     44<br />
DK/NA                 4      5     11      7      7      4      4      6      9</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Good idea            46%    37%    48%    44%    38%    25%    43%<br />
Bad idea             47     57     44     47     56     69     49<br />
DK/NA                 8      7      8      8      6      5      9<br />
21. Some have suggested that the creation of a public option should only be triggered if the private market does not meet benchmarks to extend coverage to all Americans. Do you think this is a good idea or a bad idea?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Good idea            38%    35%    42%    38%    38%    37%    37%    48%    45%<br />
Bad idea             47     47     43     52     51     44     48     36     46<br />
DK/NA                15     18     15     10     10     19     15     16     10</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Good idea            39%    40%    34%    41%    37%    36%    36%    43%    34%<br />
Bad idea             48     49     46     43     53     56     50     44     51<br />
DK/NA                13     10     19     16     10      9     14     13     15</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Good idea            39%    35%    36%    34%    41%    38%    39%<br />
Bad idea             45     55     48     49     45     55     48<br />
DK/NA                16     10     16     17     15      8     13</p>

<p><br />
22. How important is it to you that Congress approve of a health care overhaul plan this year - very important, somewhat important, not too important, or not important at all?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Very important       39%    16%    61%    36%    35%    42%    32%    71%    57%<br />
Smwht important      22     19     27     21     20     24     23     15     25<br />
Not too imp          13     24      7     13     12     15     15      6      8<br />
Not imp at all       23     38      3     28     30     16     26      6      7<br />
DK/NA                 3      3      2      2      2      3      3      3      2</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Very important       42%    38%    39%    44%    33%    40%    65%    43%    22%<br />
Smwht important      25     23     18     24     22     19     23     28     17<br />
Not too imp          11     14     14     12     13     13      7     13     17<br />
Not imp at all       19     23     25     16     31     27      4     14     42<br />
DK/NA                 2      1      4      3      1      1      1      2      3</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Very important       39%    39%    25%    29%    33%    57%    37%<br />
Smwht important      23     19     23     21     26     14     19<br />
Not too imp          13     15     18     18     13      3     13<br />
Not imp at all       22     25     32     30     26     25     27<br />
DK/NA                 3      2      3      3      2      1      4</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
23. Do you agree or disagree with the following: Congress should approve a health care overhaul plan even if only Democrats support it.</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Agree                36%     9%    64%    30%    35%    36%    31%    59%    52%<br />
Disagree             60     88     32     67     62     58     64     37     43<br />
DK/NA                 5      3      4      3      3      6      5      5      4</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Agree                35%    37%    36%    40%    34%    36%    63%    41%    16%<br />
Disagree             61     60     57     55     64     63     32     55     81<br />
DK/NA                 3      3      7      5      2      2      5      4      3</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Agree                35%    39%    22%    26%    33%    67%    31%<br />
Disagree             60     58     75     69     63     32     65<br />
DK/NA                 5      3      3      4      4      2      5</p>

<p>TREND: Do you agree or disagree with the following: Congress should approve a health care overhaul plan even if only Democrats support it.</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 5<br />
                     2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Agree                36      37      36<br />
Disagree             60      57      59<br />
DK/NA                 5       6       5</p>

<p><br />
24. Do you think the Republicans in Congress are, or are not, making a good faith effort to cooperate with Obama and the Democrats on health care reform?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Making effort        29%    48%    15%    29%    30%    29%    32%    18%    23%<br />
Not mkg effort       59     39     75     59     60     58     56     77     60<br />
DK/NA                12     13      9     12     11     13     13      5     17</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Making effort        31%    30%    28%    29%    30%    28%    16%    25%    42%<br />
Not mkg effort       59     60     59     59     61     65     78     64     46<br />
DK/NA                10     10     13     12      9      7      6     11     13</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Making effort        30%    28%    38%    34%    35%    12%    30%<br />
Not mkg effort       57     63     49     52     56     82     59<br />
DK/NA                13      9     13     13      9      5     12</p>

<p>TREND: Do you think the Republicans in Congress are, or are not, making a good faith effort to cooperate with Obama and the Democrats on health care reform?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8<br />
                     2009    2009</p>

<p>Yes/Making effort    29      29<br />
No/Not mkg effort    59      59<br />
DK/NA                12      12</p>

<p><br />
25. Do you think Obama and the Democrats in Congress are, or are not, making a good faith effort to cooperate with the Republicans on health care reform?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Making effort        43%    16%    71%    37%    40%    46%    37%    73%    63%<br />
Not mkg effort       46     74     18     53     52     42     52     18     28<br />
DK/NA                10     10     10     10      8     12     11      9      9</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Making effort        51%    43%    39%    48%    41%    40%    70%    53%    21%<br />
Not mkg effort       38     48     51     41     51     52     20     37     69<br />
DK/NA                11      9     11     11      8      8      9     10     10</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Making effort        42%    46%    27%    30%    37%    63%    38%<br />
Not mkg effort       46     47     64     59     55     35     53<br />
DK/NA                12      7      9     11      8      2      9</p>

<p>TREND: Do you think Obama and the Democrats in Congress are, or are not, making a good faith effort to cooperate with the Republicans on health care reform?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8<br />
                     2009    2009</p>

<p>Making effort        43      41<br />
Not mkg effort       46      46<br />
DK/NA                10      13</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>26. President Obama has pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our federal budget deficit over the next decade. Do you think that President Obama will be able to keep his promise or do you think any health care plan that Congress passes and President Obama signs will add to the federal budget deficit?</p>

<p>                     Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    His</p>

<p>Keep promise         19%     6%    37%    14%    17%    22%    15%    45%    24%<br />
Add to deficit       72     92     50     79     76     68     78     41     56<br />
DK/NA                 9      3     14      8      7     10      7     14     20</p>

<p>                     AGE IN YRS.......    INCOME.............  POL PHIL.........<br />
                     18-34  35-54  55+    <50    50-100 >100K  Lib    Mod    Con</p>

<p>Keep promise         23%    18%    18%    23%    17%    15%    33%    21%    11%<br />
Add to deficit       68     76     71     68     75     80     54     70     85<br />
DK/NA                10      6     11      9      8      5     12     10      3</p>

<p>                                   WHITE.............<br />
                     NoColl Coll   BrnAgn                      Military<br />
                     Degree Degree Evngl  Prot   Cath   Jew    Households</p>

<p>Keep promise         20%    17%    10%    12%    16%    22%    16%<br />
Add to deficit       70     77     86     81     78     70     77<br />
DK/NA                 9      6      4      6      6      8      7</p>

<p>TREND: President Obama has pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our federal budget deficit over the next decade. Do you think that President Obama will be able to keep his promise or do you think any health care plan that Congress passes and President Obama signs will add to the federal budget deficit?</p>

<p>                     Nov 19  Oct 8   Aug 5<br />
                     2009    2009    2009</p>

<p>Keep promise         19      19      21<br />
Add to deficit       72      71      72<br />
DK/NA                 9       9       7</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>President Obama official schedule and guidance, Nov. 19, 2009. South Korea, Alaska, Washington</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/president_obama_official_sched_170.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29512</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T09:12:45Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T00:13:52Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="President Obama schedule" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        
        <![CDATA[<p>EST<br />
 <br />
4:00PM            In-Town Travel Pool Call Time<br />
 <br />
6:05PM           THE PRESIDENT arrives at Andrews Air Force Base<br />
                         Out-of-Town Travel Pool Coverage<br />
 <br />
6:25PM           THE PRESIDENT departs Fort McNair en route The White House<br />
In-Town Travel Pool Coverage (Gather Time 4:45PM - Stakeout Location)<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
THE WHITE HOUSE<br />
Office of the Press Secretary<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________________<br />
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
November 18, 2009<br />
 <br />
DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR<br />
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2009<br />
 <br />
On Thursday morning, the President visits with United States Embassy staff and their families. This visit is closed press.<br />
 <br />
Later, the President will participate in an arrival ceremony at the Blue House. The South Korean Blue House ("Chongwadae"), so named for the distinctive blue roof tiles, is the presidential compound in Northern Seoul. The welcome ceremony is pooled press. Following the welcome ceremony, the President will hold a bilateral meeting with President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea. There is a pool spray at the top of the meeting. The President and President Lee will also hold an expanded bilateral meeting. There will be a pool spray at the top of the meeting.<br />
 <br />
In the afternoon, the President and President Lee will hold a joint press conference at the Blue House. The press conference is open to pre-credentialed media. Following the joint press conference, the President and President Lee will participate in a working lunch. The lunch is closed press.<br />
 <br />
The President delivers remarks at event with service members. The event is open to pre-credentialed media. Later, the President will depart South Korea en route Washington, DC. The departure from South Korea and arrival to Washington, DC is pooled press.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Thursday's Out-of-Town Travel Pool<br />
Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg<br />
Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP<br />
TV Corr & Crew: CNN<br />
Print: Washington Post/Washington Times<br />
Radio:NPR<br />
Travel Photo: New York Times<br />
Magazine Print: TIME<br />
 <br />
Thursday's In-Town Travel Pool<br />
Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg<br />
Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP<br />
TV Corr & Crew: CNN<br />
Print: National Journal<br />
Radio: ABC<br />
Travel Photo: TIME<br />
 <br />
Thursday, November 19, 2009<br />
 <br />
KST (Korea Standard Time)<br />
 <br />
10:10AM (KST)       THE PRESIDENT visits United States Embassy staff and their families.<br />
(8:10PM EST)          Grand Ballroom<br />
           Hyatt Regency Hotel<br />
                                Closed Press<br />
 <br />
11:00AM (KST)      THE PRESIDENT arrives at the Blue House and participates in an arrival ceremony.<br />
(9:00AM EST)        Blue House<br />
Travel Pool Coverage <br />
 <br />
11:15AM (KST)      THE PRESIDENT and President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea hold a bilateral meeting. <br />
(9:15PM EST)          Blue House<br />
                                Travel Pool Spray at the top<br />
 <br />
11:50AM (KST)      THE PRESIDENT and President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea hold an expanded bilateral meeting. <br />
(9:50PM EST)          Blue House<br />
                                Travel Pool Coverage <br />
 <br />
12:30PM (KST)      THE PRESIDENT and President Lee Myung-bak of South Korea hold a joint press conference.<br />
(10:30PM EST)         Blue House<br />
                                    Open Press <br />
 <br />
1:10PM (KST)        THE PRESIDENT and President Lee Myung-bak participate in a working lunch.<br />
(11:10PM EST)        Blue House<br />
                               Closed Press<br />
 <br />
3:20PM (KST)        THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks at event with service members.<br />
(1:20AM EST)         Osan Air Base<br />
                               Open Press<br />
 <br />
4:05PM (KST)        THE PRESIDENT departs South Korea en route Elmendorf Air Force Base in Anchorage, Alaska.<br />
(2:05AM EST)         Osan Air Base<br />
                                Travel Pool Coverage<br />
 <br />
AKST (Alaska Standard Time)<br />
 <br />
5:40AM (AKST)    THE PRESIDENT arrives  in Anchorage, Alaska.  <br />
(9:40AM EST)         Elmendorf Air Force Base<br />
                               Travel Pool Accompanies<br />
 <br />
7:40AM (AKST)    THE PRESIDENT departs Anchorage, Alaska en route Washington, DC.  <br />
(11:40AM EST)       Elmendorf Air Force Base<br />
                               Travel Pool Accompanies<br />
 <br />
EST<br />
 <br />
4:00AM EST             In-Town Travel Pool Call Time<br />
 <br />
6:05PM EST             THE PRESIDENT arrives at Andrews Air Force Base. <br />
                                 Out-of-Town Travel Pool Coverage<br />
 <br />
6:05PM EST             THE PRESIDENT departs Andrews Air Force Base en route Fort McNair<br />
                                 In-of-Town Travel Pool Coverage<br />
 <br />
6:25PM EST            THE PRESIDENT departs Fort McNair en route The White House<br />
In-Town Travel Pool (Gather Time 4:55PM - North Doors of the Palm Room)<br />
 <br />
###<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama&apos;s weighty issue; talks about weight loss</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/11/obamas_weighty_issue_his_five.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2009:/sweet//25.29510</id>

    <published>2009-11-18T23:08:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-18T23:15:26Z</updated>

    <summary> WASHINGTON--Here&apos;s the lighter side of President Obama, about five pounds worth. Two male network correspondents asked Obama about his weight, after a serious discussion about other issues during one and one interviews in Bejing, China. Obama told NBC&apos;s Chuck...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lynn Sweet</name>
        <uri>http://www.suntimes.com/index/sweet.html</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Barack Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
WASHINGTON--Here's the lighter side of President Obama, about five pounds worth.</p>

<p>Two male network correspondents asked Obama about his weight, after a serious discussion about other issues during one and one interviews in Bejing, China.</p>

<p>Obama told NBC's Chuck Todd, "My weight fluctuates about five pounds. It has for the last 30 years. It's unchanging. I still wear the same -- some of the same stuff I did when I got married 17 years ago. My hair's gotten a lot grayer; there's no doubt about that. But I'm not sure whether that's just because I was about the age where my hair was going to start getting gray."</p>

<p>Chip Reid from CBS also asked Obama about his health. "Well, look, my weight doesn't fluctuate too much. It goes in a five-pound band width," Obama said.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>Even with all the burdens, Obama said, "But I'm eating fine and I'm sleeping fine. My hair is getting gray, and it is the butt of a lot of jokes from my wife as well as my friends. You just don't have a comparable set of circumstances with two wars, a financial crisis as bad as anything since 1933, a host of regional issues that have to be dealt with, a pandemic." </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
