Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Republican Jewish Coalition does not like Obama Israeli/Palestinian border plan

| No Comments

below, RJC release....

RJC Concerned about Obama's Call for Israel to Return to 1967 borders


Washington, D.C. (May 19, 2011) --The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) reacted with concern to some of the key points President Obama made in today's major speech about the Middle East.

RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said:

Today the President called for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based "on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps." Those borders, actually the 1949 armistice lines, are physically indefensible, as numerous military experts have plainly stated. Asking Israel to return to those borders is unacceptable and places Israel in a vulnerable and dangerous position.

President Bush, in his 2004 letter to then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon memorializing the position of the United States, made it clear that, "In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli populations centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949, and all previous efforts to negotiate a two-state solution have reached the same conclusion. It is realistic to expect that any final status agreement will only be achieved on the basis of mutually agreed changes that reflect these realities."

President Bush spoke often about Israel's need for secure and defensible borders and recognized Israel's legitimate claim to certain high-population Jewish areas, such as the immediate suburbs of Jerusalem, which are beyond the 1949 armistice line. In contrast, President Obama has consistently condemned even the building of housing in municipal Jerusalem itself. It is, in fact, President Obama's insistence on a settlement freeze as a pre-condition to negotiations, more than anything else, that doomed his administration's peace-making efforts. That stand emboldened Palestinian extremists, damaged the PA's ability to negotiate, and forced Israelis to question the sincerity of the administration's friendship.

With that immediate history in mind, we are concerned that when President Obama speaks of "the 1967 borders," he means borders for Israel that are much less secure and defensible and that put Israel at risk.


# # #

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on May 19, 2011 4:53 PM.

J Street likes Obama's Israel/Palestinian speech/Obama to speak at AIPAC was the previous entry in this blog.

Jewish Democratic Council praises Obama Mideast speech is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.