Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Luis Gutierrez calls for BP banned from federal oil drilling leases

| 3 Comments

below, from Gutierrez.....

Congressman Says BP Should Stand for "Banned Permanently" When It Comes To Profiting From U.S. Oil Drilling Leases

Luis V. Gutierrez Pens Letter to Interior Secretary, Uses Floor Speech, Blog Post to Urge Colleagues to Join Him

(Washington, DC) - U.S. Representative Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) has written a letter to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar demanding that future oil drilling leases be ruled out and current oil leases reexamined for the giant corporation BP. Rep. Gutierrez said that when it comes to profiting from American oil production and exploration, the U.S. government should consider BP to stand for "Banned Permanently." Rep. Gutierrez is circulating the letter to his colleagues urging them to join him as signatories to the letter. He also used a speech before the U.S. House of Representatives and a blog article to publicize his effort.

"We kick kids out of school, ban athletes from sports, and give people life sentences with fewer warnings than we have given BP and BP is responsible for much more serious and life-threatening catastrophes over the years," said Rep. Gutierrez. "At some point the Congress and the American people have to stand up and say enough is enough, no more warnings, no more deaths, no more spills, you're out of here, bye-bye."

Rep. Gutierrez said on the House floor today (at approximately 2:00 p.m. today):

Almost a month into one of our worst manmade environmental and economic disasters and BP has worked harder to minimize public understanding and outrage than to minimize destruction to the Gulf of Mexico.

Citing the company's environmental and worker safety record in recent decades, the Congressman's letter to Secretary of the Interior Salazar says, in part (full text here):

Given this appalling record of misconduct and disregard, we ask that BP be banned permanently from receiving any future drilling leases. Their conduct at other operation sites indicates a blatant disregard for the lives of their workers, the preservation of the environment, and the millions of U.S. citizens who could be impacted by an environmental disaster.

In a blog article posted at Huffington Post, the Congressman wrote:

The President has used tough words and Secretary Salazar is pledging to get to the bottom of what happened and what BP can do now to clean up the disaster and compensate the families who lost loved ones or lost livelihoods due to BP's mistakes. But I want to take this a step further: Prove to the American people you have changed your ways, BP, before we even consider another license from the American people to make astronomical profits from our oil.

The Congressman said he would recruit signatories to his letter to Secretary Salazar throughout the week and then keep up pressure on the Secretary and the Obama Administration until he receives a satisfactory response.

###

3 Comments

Go for it Luis! I would take it a step further and threaten them with nationalization of their assets until they pay for their mistakes.

The American people hate this! Noone wants to rely on a devastatingly expensive product day in day out that is destroying our very existence. NO normal person wants this!! Make changes now! We know better ways; implement them now. Step up; fight corporate well being with big CEO payoff!!It's not fair at the expense of our land! Fight complacency and move towards futuristic thinking; avoid oil, coal, meat; and plastic in daily use. think bigger than your flesh! We are spoiled, oiled and used.

U.S. Representative Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL)I LIVE AND WORK IN SOUTH LOUISIANA, I KNOW THE PEOPLE DOWN HERE, THE OILFIELD PERSONNEL, THE SHRIMPERS, THE OYSTERMEN, THE SEAFOOD COMPANIES AND THE EATERIES, DO YOU? DO YOU REALIZE HOW MANY FAMILIES DEPEND ON THE OILFIELD TO MAKE A LIVING? DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY COMPANIES SUPPORT THE OILFIELD INDUSTRY? DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE EMPLOYED BY THE COMPANIES THAT SUPPORT THE OILFIELD INDUSTRY? BAN BP FROM DRILLING IS GOING TO BENIFIT WHO? BP BANNED FROM DRILLING....$00.00 REVENUE TO THE STATE,$00.00 TO THE EMPLOYEES THAT ARE LAYED OFF BECAUSE OF THE BAN,$00.00 REVENUE TO THE BUSINESSES THAT SUPPORT THEM, $00.00 TO THE EMPLOYES OF THE BUSINESSES THAT SUPPORT THE OILFIELD BUSINESS. YOU CUT 0FF REVENUE FROM THE BP AND YOU REMOVE INCOME TO PAY FOR THE DAMAGES, YOU REMOVE THE INCOME TO PAY THE FINES...AND YES I AGREE THAT ANY COMPANY THAT DOES NOT HAVE AND FOLLOW SAFETY STANDARDS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE...BUT DON'T CUT OFF THE HAND THAT WILL WRITE THE CHECKS FOR THE DAMAGES,AND WAGES,AND FINES. DON'T CUT YOUR NOSE OFF TO SPITE YOUR FACE. BOTH PARTIES REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT ALIKE, AND BOTH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND CONGRESS NEED TO PULL THEIR HEADS OUT OF THEIR BUTTS AND WORK TOGETHER FOR THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE FIRST AND FOREMOST AMERICANS.

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on May 18, 2010 2:37 PM.

Al Franken jokes with Elena Kagan: Did he play a lawyer on TV? was the previous entry in this blog.

Elena Kagan Supreme Court completed questionnaire just posted is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.