Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

AIG chief Liddy finally gets it

| 3 Comments

WASHINGTON --American International Group CEO Edward Liddy, during his scalping Wednesday before House members furious over $165 million in bonuses going to the bailed-out insurer, finally got the message that a company living on the charity of taxpayers has some extraordinary responsibilities.

Until his testimony, Liddy, whatever his intentions, acted as if AIG, on the dole with $170 billion in bailout money, could behave as it did when the company was solvent.

Rep. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.), a member of the House panel questioning Liddy, drilled down to the question of moral corporate citizenship that has eluded Libby when she asked him, "If the taxpayers hadn't loaned AIG any money, would the executives who received the bonuses have received them?"

Replied Liddy: "Probably not. . . . I think the company would have spiraled into bankruptcy. . . . the basic contracts would have been voided."

Liddy, who insisted Tuesday that nothing could be done about the bonuses paid to about 400 hedge fund honchos because they had contracts that legally could not be altered, came to the hearing with a symbolic concession, a request that the bonuses be voluntarily returned or reduced.

"We've heard the American people loudly and clearly these past few days," Liddy said. "The payment of large bonuses to people in the very unit that caused so much of AIG's financial troubles does not sit well with the American taxpayer in any way, shape, or form, and for a good reason.

"Accordingly, this morning I've asked the employees of AIG Financial Products to step up and do the right thing. Specifically, I've asked those who received retention payments in excess of $100,000 or more to return at least half of those payments."

Liddy -- whose actual testimony was far more conciliatory than his prepared statement -- asked the very top executives to reject 100 percent of the bonus checks. He said some refunds have started coming in already.

With Liddy insisting these past days that AIG contracts were sacred, Rep. Don Manzullo (R-Ill.) took a shot at Liddy, the former CEO of Northbrook-based Allstate, reminding him he decreed contract changes with employees while he was at Allstate.

"I did do that," Liddy conceded.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, President Obama, Congress and mad-as-hell taxpayers are looking to get the money back -- all of it.

The AIG crisis is consuming the White House, a sizable distraction at a time when Obama is trying to sell his massive 2010 spending plan. He also is assuring the nation his $787 billion stimulus spending won't be lost to waste, fraud and abuse.

Before leaving for California Wednesday, Obama said he wanted to create a "resolution authority" that would exercise greater authority over AIG, an element in a larger package of regulatory reforms he is planning.

People are right to be angry over the AIG mess, he said. "What I want us to do, though, is channel our anger in a constructive way."

Congress and the Bush White House -- not the Obama administration -- approved the deal that let AIG workers retain their bonuses even as AIG was going on welfare.

Today, the House will vote on a bill to tax the bonuses at a 90 percent rate.

AIG Financial Products workers are due another $200 million in bonuses in March 2010, already in the pipeline for work not yet done. Said Liddy: "That size bonus, there's no way that that will be paid."

3 Comments

"not the Obama administration"?
Hey Lynn,

Instead of being an apologist for Obama why don't you try to do some reporting? It apears that Chriss Dodd has said the the bonus program was approved by someone in the administration! I'm sure we will never see a correction in a future column because it will never come out in the administration talking points. In this day and age we need reporters not parrots. Maybe you should reunite yourself with the notion of bringing your customers the news and not the newest pabulum from Rahm Emanuel.

$165 Million is NOTHING compared to the WAR FOR OIL masquerading as a 'war on terror'--this is so silly.
IT'S MEANT TO DISTRACT US FROM REAL STUFF!
Focusing on this story--AIG/Lehman, etc.. is like saying "Wow! There's an inch of water in the basement!"
When you should be saying--IT'S RAINING BLOOD AND WE'RE MISSING A ROOF! (The roof missing and the blood courtesy of KBR/Halliburton, GE and other masters of war profiteering).

Aye carumba!,

You mean the war for oil that the messiah is going to end. Someday! Maybe in the next year or so. Probably. After all, he's outraged. So the troops are coming home. Sooner or later. Kind of!

p.s. Where's the oil?

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on March 19, 2009 6:33 AM.

Obama's new $500,000 book deal. Washington Times scoop. UPDATE was the previous entry in this blog.

President Obama official schedule and guidance, March 19, 2009. In California for town hall, Leno show is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.