The scoop from Washington

Burris faces cold shoulder from Senate Democrats when he comes to Washington Monday to claim Obama seat

| 5 Comments


WASHINGTON -- Roland Burris does not want to be in the face of the senators whose ranks he hopes to join, I am told. Yet Burris, appointed by the scandalized Gov. Blagojevich to replace President-elect Barack Obama, is expected here Monday. Burris' mere presence to try to claim the seat will, of course, be a spectacle.

He won't get into the chamber because the Senate Democratic leadership doesn't want anyone sent by Blagojevich, accused of trying to sell Obama's seat for a plum job or campaign cash.

Here's what I've learned New Years Day:

I think Burris is underestimating how hard the Senate Democratic leaders are resisting his appointment. No one doubts that Burris is eligible to serve. No one is going to challenge Blagojevich's power to make the appointment. But they won't make it easy


WASHINGTON -- Roland Burris does not want to be in the face of the senators whose ranks he hopes to join, I am told. Yet Burris, appointed by the scandalized Gov. Blagojevich to replace President-elect Barack Obama, is expected here Monday. Burris' mere presence to try to claim the seat will, of course, be a spectacle.

He won't get into the chamber because the Senate Democratic leadership doesn't want anyone sent by Blagojevich, accused of trying to sell Obama's seat for a plum job or campaign cash.

Here's what I've learned New Years Day:

I think Burris is underestimating how hard the Senate Democratic leaders are resisting his appointment. No one doubts that Burris is eligible to serve. No one is going to challenge Blagojevich's power to make the appointment. But they won't make it easy.

The new Congress will be sworn in Tuesday. Burris will arrive with no floor privileges because Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White will not certify his appointment. The Senate will likely refer the matter to the Rules Committee, where it will be handled as s-l-o-w-l-y as possible. For example, the rules panel will require a very, very, very complete investigation to make sure the appointment is stain-free.

While the Senate Democrats are slow-walking, they want the Illinois House to fast-walk the Blagojevich impeachment proceedings, and then have a swift state Senate trial, conviction, and installation of Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn as governor. Quinn then can make the pick, preferably a Democrat with an excellent chance of winning either a special election or the 2010 contest.

Given Burris' string of statewide defeats for senator and governor, he does not fit that profile.

Burris has unrealistic hopes of getting assistance from Sen. Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate leader. If he thinks Durbin is going to escort him into the chamber -- he will not. Durbin called Burris twice to discuss the situation, but Burris never got the messages because he hasn't got his cell phone thing down.

Durbin will be marking the beginning of his second term Monday and Tuesday with a series of receptions. Though Burris is not on any invitee list, "if he shows up, we will be gracious about this," Durbin spokesman Joe Shoemaker told me Thursday. Durbin's team has been told Burris would like to see him. "I can't imagine that we wouldn't meet with him," Shoemaker said.

Burris faces a big challenge in pulling off this trip. He wants to look senatorial, but coming here will just fuel the media circus surrounding his selection.

Burris, the first African American to win statewide office in Illinois, may want to tone down the race rhetoric. The point has been made by Rep. Bobby Rush. Obama was the only African American in the Senate, and his departure for the White House leaves a void.

But Illinois voters -- unlike those in any other state since Reconstruction --have twice sent an African American to the Senate, Obama and Carol Moseley Braun. There is no reason to think that over time, Illinois will not send more minorities and, may I add, females to Congress.

David Axelrod, Obama's chief strategist, told me Thursday, "The PE [president-elect ] has a high regard for Roland Burris. He simply doesn't believe the process by which he was appointed was appropriate, given the circumstances surrounding it."

Remember, this is not about Burris, though national reporters are fascinated that Burris, ever the chest thumper, has built a mausoleum for himself decorated with a list of his accomplishments. But I wouldn't chisel in "Senator." Not yet.

5 Comments

I think it would be appropriate for Governor Blagojevich and his wife Patti to accompany U.S. Senator Roland Burris to the Senate chambers. Other Illinois citizens who believe in the rule of law should also accompany our most recently appointed U.S. Senator.
Somebody should embroider a scarlet "A" for the Governor to wear that stands for "ACCUSED." It seems that we have returned to the days before the Revolutionary War and our system of justice that includes "innocent until proven guilty."

I am curious where exactly the Govenor is given the power to appoint and if there are any checks/balances provided by law for such an appointment. I looked at the US Constitution.

Article I. Section 3. Paragraph 2

"...if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies." (Emphasis added)

Although that was changed with the 17th amendment. (Paragraph 2)

"When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct." (Emphasis added)

I read the Illinois constitution and the only power of appointment that I can find pertains to non-elected officiers for the state of Illinois. So, where does the Govenor get the authority to make a Senate appointment? If anything, it seems the US Constitution has given the govenor the power to call a special election, which I believe he initially said he would support. In the end, he decided to use his "power" to appoint Burris rather than use his real power to call an election. Hmmmm.

Who CARES what the SPINELESS Congress that REFUSED to impeach the biggest liar, cheat, killer, thief you name it.

How dare they not seat Burris when they refuse to explore whether Obama is actually a natural born citizen and are ignoring well over a dozen suits filed to that effect? It they are so concerned about "appearances," then why don't they take the steps to assure an increasingly skeptical public that Obama is actually qualified to be POTUS? Do they think that the inauguration will make these concerns go away? They do so at the peril of our country.

@George: There is a state statute that authorizes the appointment in accordance with the 17th Amendment

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on January 2, 2009 1:42 PM.

No plans now for Blagojevich to accompany Burris to Washington to claim Obama seat was the previous entry in this blog.

Obama presses Congress to pass economic recovery plan. Meets with Pelosi, Reid, GOP leaders Monday is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.