LEVITTOWN, PA.-- This new Obama web-only ad slams Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) again for taking contributions from lobbyists. The Clinton team response on a conference call this morning: we don't comment on web spts.
New Obama, Clinton Pennsylvania web ads
Categories:
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
Get the Sweet widget
More widgets
Tag Cloud
Categories
Monthly Archives
- October 2008 (169)
- September 2008 (176)
- August 2008 (220)
- July 2008 (135)
- June 2008 (203)
- May 2008 (147)
- April 2008 (155)
- March 2008 (133)
- February 2008 (93)
- January 2008 (117)
- December 2007 (85)
- November 2007 (87)
- October 2007 (117)
- September 2007 (76)
- August 2007 (41)
- July 2007 (74)
- June 2007 (46)
- May 2007 (58)
- April 2007 (60)
- March 2007 (42)
- February 2007 (46)
- January 2007 (82)
- December 2006 (28)
- November 2006 (46)
- October 2006 (44)
- September 2006 (33)
- August 2006 (28)
- July 2006 (48)
- June 2006 (57)
- May 2006 (86)
- April 2006 (84)
- March 2006 (103)
- February 2006 (54)
Lynn Sweet
Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.
Sweet Links
Annenberg Political Fact Check
Breitbart.com (Andrew Breitbart)
Center for Responsive Politics
Chicago Sun-Times (Sweet blog)
Illinois Campaign for Political Reform
Pollster.com (Mark Blumenthal)
Wall Street Journal (Elections)
Washington Post (Chris Cillzza)
Washington Post (Dan Froomkin)
Washington Post (Mary Ann Akers)
Photo galleries
Obama in Africa
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on April 15, 2008 11:56 AM.
Clinton pressing Obama to disclose tax returns for all of public life, not just the Senate years. was the previous entry in this blog.
Obama to go up with Pennsylvania spot to rebut Clinton ad calling him elite because of "bitter" remark. Sweet scoop is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Thanks for posting both ads side by side, Lynn.
What it showed was not surprising--Barry Soleto's crowd is slick. (Can I trust somebody who changed their name? That's kinda 80s, no?)
We knew that. Axelrod gets a LOT of money for his ads. And he gets it the same place Hilary HAD to get her money.
Only Barry and Michelle aren't honest about it, are they?
Hilary's outspent three to one by the Obama/Daley/Rezko machine in PA. And he needed to do that.
The reason is evident in the two ads:
Hilary's ad reflects a real, grassroots ground game (something you can drink with, eat with--note how Barack doesn't get his hands dirty unless it's to buy 100 dollar a pound ham samples to 'show' he 'ain't a muslim (he's not--but that women to the back of the bus mentality sure rubbed off him from somewhere).
Barack's ad reflects a fake, glitzy--hey text-messaging teenagers who don't read a newspaper (thank god--they might see that Rezko looks like Tony Soprano!).
Listen to the audio tape. Whole lot of mau-mauing going on.
(Note to kids: Read Tom Wolfe's "Radical Chic & Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers." Obama missed the 70s (it was GREAT and most of us were peaceful, productive activists).
Will we miss Obama if he doesn't fold soon into the Hilary campaign? Depends on how bad that spoiler smell gets.
What is with these morons insisting on calling Barack Obama "Barry"? Why does his name bug you? He's devoted two books to explaining his life and identity, read one. Or maybe, ignorance is bliss?