Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Sweet: Complete transcript of Democratic Debate. Austin, Feb. 21, 2008.


AUSTIN, TEXAS--Democratic debate transcript, courtesy of CNN.


FEBRUARY 21, 2008


BROWN: And the candidates have taken their seats. We are ready to
get started. On behalf of CNN, Univision and the candidates, we want to
thank our hosts, the University of Texas and the LBJ School and Library.
And now I want to give you an idea of what to expect over the next
90 minutes or so. We want to have a real conversation between these two
candidates on the issues important to Texas and the entire nation, so we
won't have any hard and fast rules for them to follow. We simply ask the
candidates to keep their answers to a reasonable length and to stay on
And we have given the candidates the opportunity to make opening
statements. The order was determined by a draw. Senator Obama won the
draw and elected to go second.
So please go ahead, Senator Clinton.
CLINTON: Well, thank you.
And I am just delighted to be back here in Austin. You know, nearly
36 years ago I came to Austin for my very first political job, and that
was registering voters in south Texas. And I had the great privilege of
living for a while in Austin and in San Antonio, and meeting people and
making friends that have stayed with me for a lifetime.
And I found that we had a lot in common, a lot of shared values, a
belief that hard work is important, that self-reliance and individual
responsibility count for a lot.
CLINTON: And among the people whom I got to know, who became not
only friends, but heroes, were Barbara Jordan, who taught me a lot about
courage, and today...
...would actually be her birthday. I remember all the time about
how she got up every single morning, facing almost insurmountable odds,
to do what she did.
And another was my great friend Ann Richards, who taught me so much...
... about determination. Ann was a great champion for the people of
Texas. She also reminded us that every so often it is good to have a
laugh about what it is we're engaged in.
And as I think back on those years and the work that I've done ever
since, you know, for me politics is about making real differences in
people's lives. I am very, very proud that over these years I have been
able to make a difference in the lives of people in Texas, Ohio and
CLINTON: You know, 350,000 children in Texas get health care every
month because I helped to start the Children's Health Insurance Program.
And 21,000 National Guard and Reserve members get access to health
care because I went across the party line and joined up with a
Republican senator to make that happen.
So there's a lot that we've already done. But there's so much more
to do.
I want to take on the tough issues that face us now. I want to stop
the health insurance companies from discriminating against people
because they're sick. You know, it's unconstitutional to discriminate
on the basis of race or gender or ethnic origin or religion, but it's OK
to discriminate against sick people.
And we're going to end that, because it's time we said no more.
And I want to continue the work that I've done in the Senate to take
care of our veterans.
CLINTON: It was shocking and shameful, what happened, that we
discovered about a year ago at Walter Reed. We can do so much better,
to take care of the people who've taken care of us.
And there is a lot of work ahead. I offer a lifetime of experience
and proven results. And I know that, if we work together, we can take
on the special interests, transfer $55 billion of all those giveaways
and subsidies that President Bush has given them, back to the middle
class, to create jobs and provide health care and make college affordable.
And I ask you -- I ask you to join in my campaign. It's now up to
the people of Texas, Ohio, and the other states ahead.
So, if you'll be part of this campaign, which is your really your
campaign, about your futures, your families, your jobs and your health
care, we'll continue to make a difference for America.
Thank you all very much.
BROWN: Senator Clinton, thank you.
BROWN: Senator Obama?
OBAMA: First of all, thank you so much to the University of Texas
for hosting us, and it's a great honor to share the stage once again
with Senator Clinton. I've said before that we've been friends before
this campaign started; we'll be friends afterwards, unified to bring
about changes in this country.
You know, we are at a defining moment in our history. Our nation is
at war, and our economy is increasingly in shambles. And the families
of Texas and all across America are feeling the brunt of that failing
This week, I met a couple in San Antonio, who -- as a consequence of
entering into a predatory loan -- are on the brink of foreclosure and
are actually seeing them having to cut back on their medical expenses,
because their mortgage doubled in two weeks.
OBAMA: I've met a young woman who gets three hours of sleep a night
because she has to work the night shift even as she's going to school
full time, and still can't afford to provide the health care for her
sister who's ill.
In Youngstown, Ohio, talked to workers who have seen their plants
shipped overseas as a consequence of bad trade deals like NAFTA,
literally seeing equipment unbolted from the floors of factories and
shipped to China, resulting in devastating job losses and communities
completely falling apart.
And all across America I'm meeting not just veterans, but also the
parents of those who have fallen.
One mother in Green Bay gave me this bracelet in memory of a 20-
year-old son who had been killed in a roadside bomb, as a consequence of
a war that I believe should have never been authorized and should have
never been waged and has cost us billions of dollars that could have
been invested here in the United States in roads and bridges and
infrastructure and making sure that young people can go to college and
that those who need health care actually get it.
OBAMA: Now, Senator Clinton...
... Senator Clinton and I have been talking about these issues for
the last 13 months. We both offer detailed proposals to try to deal
with them. Some of them are the same. Some we have differences of opinion.
But I think we both recognize that these problems have to be dealt
with and that we have seen an administration over the last seven years
that has failed to address them and -- in many ways -- has made them worse.
But understand that what is lacking right now is not good ideas.
OBAMA: The problem we have is that Washington has become a place
where good ideas go to die. They go to die because the lobbyists...
They go to die because lobbyists and special interests have a
strangle-hold on the agenda in Washington. They go to die in Washington
because too many politicians are interested in scoring political points
rather than bridging differences in order to get things done.
And so the central premise of this campaign is that we can bring
this country together, that we can push against the special interests
that have come to dominate the agenda in Washington, that we can be
straight with the American people about how we're going to solve these
problems and enlist them in taking back their government.
You know, Senator Clinton mentioned Barbara Jordan, somebody who was
an inspiration to me and so many people throughout the country. And she
said that what the American people want is very simple: They want an
America that is as good as its promise.
OBAMA: I'm running for president because I want to help America be
as good as its promise.
Thank you very much.
BROWN: All right, Senator Obama, thank you, and let's begin with
Jorge Ramos?
RAMOS: Thank you very much (SPEAKING IN SPANISH).
Thank you so much for being with us, and let me start with a little
news. After nearly half a century in office, Fidel Castro resigned as
the head of the Cuban government. Ninety miles off the coast of the
United States, we might have a new opportunity.
The question for you, Senator Clinton: Would you be willing to sit
down with Raul Castro, or whoever leads the Cuban dictatorship when you
take office at least just once, to get a measure of the man?
CLINTON: Well, Jorge, I hope we have an opportunity. The people of
Cuba deserve to have a democracy. And this gives the Cuban government,
under Raul Castro, a chance to change direction from the one that was
set for 50 years by his brother.
I'm going to be looking for some of those changes: releasing
political prisoner, ending some of the oppressive practices on the
press, opening up the economy.
Of course the United States stands ready. And, as president, I
would be ready to reach out and work with a new Cuban government, once
it demonstrated that it truly was going to change that direction.
I want to bring the region together, our European allies who have
influence with Cuba, to try to push for some of those changes, and to
make it very clear that, if Cuba moves toward democracy and freedom for
its people, the United States will welcome that.
CLINTON: And as president, I would look for opportunities to try to
make that happen and to create the momentum that might eventually lead
to a presidential visit.
But there has to be evidence that indeed the changes are real; that
they are taking place; and that the Cuban people will finally be given
an opportunity to have their future determined by themselves.
RAMOS: Very simply, would you meet with him or not, with Raul Castro?
CLINTON: I would not meet with him until there was evidence that
change was happening, because I think it's important that they
demonstrate clearly that they are committed to change the direction.
Then I think, you know, something like diplomatic encounters and
negotiations over specifics could take place.
But we've had this conversation before, Senator Obama and myself,
and I believe that we should have full diplomatic engagement where
appropriate. But a presidential visit should not be offered and given
without some evidence that it will demonstrate the kind of progress that
is in our interest, and in this case, in the interests of the Cuban people.
BROWN: Senator Obama, just to follow up, you had said in a previous
CNN debate that you would meet with the leaders of Cuban, Iran, North
Korea, among others, so presumably you would be willing to meet with the
new leader of Cuba.
OBAMA: That's correct. Now, keep in mind that the starting point
for our policy in Cuba should be the liberty of the Cuban people. And I
think we recognize that that liberty has not existed throughout the
Castro regime. And we now have an opportunity to potentially change the
relationship between the United States and Cuba after over half a century.
I would meet without preconditions, although Senator Clinton is
right that there has to be preparation. It is very important for us to
make sure that there was an agenda, and on that agenda was human rights,
releasing of political prisoners, opening up the press. And that
preparation might take some time.
But I do think that it's important for the United States not just to
talk to its friends, but also to talk to its enemies. In fact, that's
where diplomacy makes the biggest difference.
OBAMA: One other thing that I've said, as a show of good faith that
we're interested in pursuing potentially a new relationship, what I've
called for is a loosening of the restrictions on remittances from family
members to the people of Cuba, as well as travel restrictions for family
members who want to visit their family members in Cuba.
And I think that initiating that change in policy as a start and
then suggesting that an agenda get set up is something that could be
useful, but I would not normalize relations until we started seeing some
of the progress that Senator Clinton was talking about.
BROWN: But that's different from your position back in 2003. You
called U.S. policy toward Cuba a miserable failure, and you supported
normalizing relations.
BROWN: So you've backtracked now...
OBAMA: I support the eventual normalization. And it's absolutely
true that I think our policy has been a failure. I mean, the fact is,
is that during my entire lifetime, and Senator Clinton's entire
lifetime, you essentially have seen a Cuba that has been isolated, but
has not made progress when it comes to the issues of political rights
and personal freedoms that are so important to the people of Cuba.
So I think that we have to shift policy. I think our goal has to be
ultimately normalization. But that's going to happen in steps. And the
first step, as I said, is changing our rules with respect to remittances
and with respect to travel.
And then I think it is important for us to have the direct contact,
not just in Cuba, but I think this principle applies generally. I
recall what John F. Kennedy once said, that we should never negotiate
out of fear, but we should never fear to negotiate. And this moment,
this opportunity when Fidel Castro has finally stepped down, I think, is
one that we should try to take advantage of.
BROWN: Senator Clinton, do you want a quick response?
CLINTON: Well, I agree, absolutely, that we should be willing to
have diplomatic negotiations and processes with anyone. I've been a
strong advocate of opening up such a diplomatic process with Iran, for a
number of years.
Because I think we should look for ways that we can possibly move
countries that are adversarial to us, you know, toward the world
community. It's in our interests. It's in the interests of the people
in countries that, frankly, are oppressed, like Cuba, like Iran.
But there has been this difference between us over when and whether
the president should offer a meeting, without preconditions, with those
with whom we do not have diplomatic relations. And it should be part of
a process, but I don't think it should be offered in the beginning.
Because I think that undermines the capacity for us to actually take the
measure of somebody like Raul Castro or Ahmadinejad and others.
CLINTON: And, as President Kennedy said, he wouldn't be afraid to
negotiate, but he would expect there to be a lot of preparatory work
done, to find out exactly what we would get out of it.
And therefore, I do think we should be eliminating the policy of the
Bush administration, which has been very narrowly defined, and frankly
against our interests, because we have failed to reach out to countries,
we have alienated our friends, and we have emboldened our enemies.
So I would get back to very vigorous diplomacy, and I would use
bipartisan diplomacy. I would ask emissaries from both political
parties to represent me and our country, because I want to send a very
clear message to the rest of the world that the era of unilateralism,
preemption and arrogance of the Bush administration is over and we're
going to...
BROWN: Very briefly and then we're going to move on.
OBAMA: I think, as I said before, preparation is actually
absolutely critical in any meeting. And I think it is absolutely true
that either of us would step back from some of the Bush unilateralism
that's caused so much damage.
But I do think it is important precisely because the Bush
administration has done so much damage to American foreign relations
that the president take a more active role in diplomacy than might have
been true 20 or 30 years ago.
Because the problem is, if we think that meeting with the president
is a privilege that has to be earned, I think that reinforces the sense
that we stand above the rest of the world at this point in time. And I
think that it's important for us in undoing the damage that has been
done over the last seven years, for the president to be willing to take
that extra step.
OBAMA: That is the kind of step that I would like to take as
president of the United States.
BROWN: A question now on the economy.
John King?
KING: Campbell, Senators, good evening, first.
I want to bring the conversation back home. You know from your
travels -- you don't need to look at the polls or anything else -- that
the economy is by far now the dominant issue that voters want to hear
about from the candidates.
For some, that is a question about: What should we do about an
economy that is at the edge or perhaps in the early stages of a
recession? For some, it is more focused. Maybe it is: Will you raise
the minimum wage? Maybe it's about trade deals that they think leave
them on the raw end, as you mentioned in your opening statement, Senator
But when we ask Democrats, "How are these two candidates
different?," they even think they don't know.
Senator Obama, beginning with you, tell us as specifically as you
can, how would a President Obama be different than a President Clinton
in managing the nation's economy?
OBAMA: Well, first of all, let me emphasize the point that you just
made, which is: You don't need an economist or the Federal Reserve to
tell the American people that the economy's in trouble, because they've
been experiencing it for years now.
Everywhere you go, you meet people who are working harder for less,
wages and incomes have flatlined, people are seeing escalating costs of
everything from health care to gas at the pump.
And so people have been struggling for a long time. In some
communities, they have been struggling for decades now. So this has to
be a priority of the next president.
Now, what I've said is that we have to restore a sense of fairness
and balance to our economy, and that means a couple of things.
Number one, with our tax code: We've got to stop giving tax breaks
to companies that are shipping jobs overseas and invest those tax breaks
in companies that are investing here in the United States of America.
We have to end the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy...
... and to provide tax breaks to middle-class Americans and working
Americans who need them.
OBAMA: So I've said that if you are making $75,000 a year or less,
I want to give an offset to your payroll tax that will mean $1,000 extra
in the pockets of ordinary Americans. Senior citizens making less than
$50,000, you shouldn't have to pay income tax on your Social Security.
We pay for these by closing tax loopholes and tax havens that are
being manipulated.
On our trade deals, I think it is absolutely critical that we
engaged in trade, but it has to be viewed not just through the lens of
Wall Street, but also Main Street, which means we've got strong labor
standards and strong environmental standards and safety standards, so we
don't have toys being shipped in the United States with lead paint on them.
So these are all issues that I've talked about repeatedly, and I
think there are also opportunities in our economy around creating a
green economy. We send $1 billion to foreign countries every day
because of our addiction to foreign oil.
OBAMA: And for us to move rapidly to cap greenhouse gases, generate
billions of dollars that we can reinvest in solar and wind and biodiesel
-- that can put people back to work. So...
Now, I don't want to take too much time. And I'm sure we'll be
spend more time discussing this.
Senator Clinton and I, I think, both agree on many of these issues.
And I think it's a credit to the Democratic Party as a whole that the
other candidates who were involved earlier on agreed with us on many of
these issues.
I think that there is a real, solid agenda for moving change forward
in the next presidency.
The question people are going to have to ask is: How do we get it done?
And it is my strong belief that the changes are only going to come
about if we're able to form a working coalition for change. Because
people who were benefiting from the current tax code are going to
resist. The special interests and lobbyists are going to resist.
And I think it has to be a priority for whoever the next president
is to be able to overcome the dominance of the special interests in
Washington, to bring about the kinds of economic changes that I'm
talking about.
OBAMA: And that's an area where Senator Clinton and I may have a
slight difference. But I'm happy to let her speak first and then can
pick up on anything that's been left out.
KING: Let's give Senator Clinton that opportunity then.
As you have campaigned, Senator, on this issue and others, but
specifically on this issue, you have said, "I am ready on day one to
take charge of the economy."
The clear implication, since you have one opponent at the moment, is
that you're ready; he's not.
What would you do differently on day one than a President Obama
would when it comes to managing the nation's economy?
CLINTON: Well, I would agree with a lot that Senator Obama just
said, because it is the Democratic agenda.
CLINTON: We are going to rid the tax code of these loopholes and
We're going to stop giving a penny of your money to anybody who
ships a job out of Texas, Ohio or anywhere else to another country.
We're certainly going to begin to get the tax code to reflect what
the needs of middle class families are so we can rebuild a strong and
prosperous middle class.
You know, the wealthy and the well-connected have had a president
the last seven years, and I think it's time that the rest of America had
a president to work for you every single day.
We will also have a different approach toward trade.
We're going to start having trade agreements that not only have
strong environmental and labor standards, but I want to have a trade
time-out. We're going to look and see what's working and what's not
working, and I'd like to have a trade prosecutor to actually enforce the
trade agreements that we have before we enter into any others.
We're also going to put much tougher standards in place so that
people cannot import toys with lead paint, contaminated pet food,
contaminated drugs into our market. We're going to have much more
vigorous enforcement of safety standards.
CLINTON: Now, in addition, there are steps I would take
immediately. One is on this foreclosure crisis. I have been saying for
nearly a year we had to crack down on the abusive practices of the
lenders. But we also need a moratorium on home foreclosures.
Everywhere I go, I meet people who either have been or about to lose
their home. 85,000 homes in foreclosure in Texas; 90,000 in Ohio. I've
met the families: the hairdresser, the single mom who's going to lose
her home, the postal worker who got really hoodwinked into an agreement
that wasn't fair to him.
So I would put a moratorium for 90 days, to give us time to work out
a way for people to stay in their homes, and I would freeze interest
rates for five years. Because these adjustable-rate mortgages, if they
keep going up, millions of Americans are going to be homeless. And
vacant homes will be across the neighborhoods of Texas and America.
CLINTON: Now, in addition, there are three ways we need to jump
start the economy.
Clean green jobs; I've been promoting this. I wanted it to be part
of the stimulus package. I thought a $5 billion investment in clean
green jobs would put hundreds of thousands of Americans to work helping
to create our future.
We also need to invest in our infrastructure. We don't have enough
roads to take care of the congestion, we have crumbling bridges and
tunnels. We need to rebuild America, and that will also put people to work.
And, finally, we need to end George Bush's war on science, which has
been waged against scientists and researchers...
BROWN: Thank you, Senator. And we've got a lot of ground to cover...
CLINTON: This is about how we fund the future. We've got to get
back to being the innovation nation. Think of everything that goes on
at this great university to create the new economy...
BROWN: All right. Senator Clinton, thank you very much.
BROWN: And, as I was saying, we've got a lot to get through. So I
do want to shift gears and go on to another topic especially important
here in Texas, which is immigration.
And, Jorge, you have a question.
RAMOS: (SPEAKING IN SPANISH) Federal raids by immigration
enforcement officials on homes and businesses have generated a great
deal of fear and anxiety in the Hispanic community and have divided the
family of some of the 3 million U.S.-born children who have at least one
undocumented parent.
Would you consider stopping these raids once you take office until
comprehensive immigration reform can be passed?
CLINTON: I would consider that, except in egregious situations
where it would be appropriate to take the actions you're referring to.
But when we see what's been happening, with literally babies being
left with no one to take care of them, children coming home from school,
no responsible adult left, that is not the America that I know.
CLINTON: That is against American values. And it is...
And it is a stark admission of failure by the federal government. We
need comprehensive immigration reform. I have been for this. I signed
onto the first comprehensive bill back in 2004. I've been advocating
for it: tougher, more secure borders, of course, but let's do it the
right way, cracking down on employers, especially once we get to
comprehensive immigration reform, who exploit undocumented workers and
drive down wages for everyone else.
I'd like to see more federal help for communities like Austin and
others like Laredo, where I was this morning, that absorb the health
care, education, and law enforcement costs.
And I personally, as president, would work with our neighbors to the
south, to help them create more jobs for their own people.
Finally, we need a path to legalization, to bring the immigrants out
of the shadows, give them the conditions that we expect them to meet,
paying a fine for coming here illegally, trying to pay back taxes, over
time, and learning English.
If they had a committed a crime in our country or the country they
came from, then they should be deported. But for everyone else, there
must be a path to legalization. I would introduce that in the first 100
days of my presidency.
BROWN: Senator Obama, is your position the same as Hillary Clinton's?
OBAMA: There are a couple of things I would add. Comprehensive
immigration reform is something that I have worked on extensively.
Two years ago, we were able to get a bill out of the Senate. I was
one of the group of senators that helped to move it through, but it died
in the House this year. Because it was used as a political football
instead of a way of solving a problem, nothing happened.
And so there are a couple of things that I would just add to what
Senator Clinton said.
Number one, it is absolutely critical that we tone down the rhetoric
when it comes to the immigration debate, because there has been an
undertone that has been ugly.
Oftentimes, it has been directed at the Hispanic community. We have
seen hate crimes skyrocket in the wake of the immigration debate as it
has been conducted in Washington, and that is unacceptable.
We are a nation of laws and we are a nation of immigrants, and we
can reconcile those two things. So we need comprehensive reform...
... we need comprehensive reform, and that means stronger border
security. It means that we are cracking down on employers that are
taking advantage of undocumented workers because they can't complain if
they're not paid a minimum wage.
OBAMA: They can't complain if they're not getting overtime. Worker
safety laws are not being observed.
We have to crack down on those employers, although we also have to
make sure that we do it in a way that doesn't lead to people with
Spanish surnames being discriminated against, so there's got to be a
safeguard there.
We have to require that undocumented workers, who are provided a
pathway to citizenship, not only learn English, pay back taxes and pay a
significant fine, but also that they're going to the back of the line,
so that they are not getting citizenship before those who have applied
legally, which raises two last points.
Number one, it is important that we fix the legal immigration
system, because right now we've got a backlog that means years for
people to apply legally.
And what's worse is, we keep on increasing the fees, so that if
you've got a hard working immigrant family, they've got to hire a
lawyer; they've got to pay thousands of dollars in fees. They just
can't afford it. And it's discriminatory against people who have good
character, we should want in this country, but don't have the money. So
we've got to fix that.
OBAMA: So we've got to fix that.
The second thing is, we have to improve our relationship with Mexico
and work with the Mexican government so that their economy is producing
jobs on that side of the border.
And the problem that we have...
The problem that we have is that we have had an administration that
came in promising all sorts of leadership on creating a U.S.- Mexican
relationship. And, frankly, President Bush dropped the ball. He has
been so obsessed with Iraq that we have not seen the kinds of outreach
and cooperative work that would ensure that the Mexican economy is
working not just for the very wealthy in Mexico, but for all people.
And that's as policy that I'm going to change when I'm president of the
United States.
BROWN: All right, Senator Obama.
We're going to stay with this topic. I want to have John King ask
another question.
Go ahead, John.
KING: I want to stay on the issue, but move to a controversial item
that was not held up when the immigration debate collapsed in
Washington, and that is the border fence.
KING: To many Americans, it is a simple question of sovereignty and
security. America should be able to keep people out that it doesn't
want in.
But, as you know in this state, especially if you go to the south of
here, along the border, and in other border states, to many people it's
a much more personal question. It could be a question of their
livelihood. It could be a question of cross-border trade. It might be
an issue to a rancher of property rights. It might be a simple question
of whether someone can take a walk or a short drive to see their family
Senator, back in 2006, you voted for the construction of that
fence. As you know, progress has been slow.
As president of the United States, would you commit tonight that you
would finish the fence and speed up the construction, or do you think
it's time for a president of the United States to raise his or her hand
and say, "You know what? Wait a minute. Let's think about this again.
Do we really want to do this?"
CLINTON: Well, I think both Senator Obama and I voted for that as
part of the immigration debate.
CLINTON: And having been along the border for the last week or so
-- in fact, last night I was at the University of Texas at Brownsville
-- and this is how absurd this has become under the Bush
administration. Because, you know, there is a smart way to protect our
borders, and there is a dumb way to protect our borders.
And what I learned last night when I was there with Congressman
Ortiz is that the University of Texas at Brownsville would have part of
its campus cut off.
This is the kind of absurdity that we're getting from this
administration. I know it because I've been fighting with them about
the northern border. Their imposition of passports and other kinds of
burdens are separating people from families, interfering with business
and commerce, the movement of goods and people.
So what I've said is that I would say, wait a minute, we need to
review this. There may be places where a physical barrier is appropriate.
I think when both of us voted for this, we were voting for the
possibility that where it was appropriate and made sense, it would be
considered. But as with so much, the Bush administration has gone off
the deep end, and they are unfortunately coming up with a plan that I
think is counterproductive.
CLINTON: So I would have a review. I would listen to the people
who live along the border, who understand...
... what it is we need to be doing to protect our country.
BROWN: Let me go on, again -- John?
KING: Does that mean that you think your vote was wrong, or the
implementation of it was wrong?
Because, as you know, when they first built the fence in the San
Diego area, it only went so far. And what it did was it sopped the
people coming straight up the path of where that was built, and they
simply moved. And California's problem became Arizona's problem.
CLINTON: But, you know, John, there is -- there's a lot we've
learned about technology and smart fencing. You know, there is
technology that can be used instead of a physical barrier.
CLINTON: It requires us having enough personnel along the border so
that people can be supervising a certain limited amount of space and
will be able to be responsive in the event of people attempting to cross
I think that the way that the Bush administration is going about
this, filing eminent domain actions against landowners and
municipalities, makes no sense.
So what I have said is, yes, there are places when after a careful
review, again listening to the people who live along the border, there
may be limited places where it would work. But let's deploy more
technology and personnel, instead of the physical barrier.
I frankly think that will work better and it will give us an
opportunity to secure our borders without interfering with family
relations, business relations, recreation and so much else that makes
living along the border, you know, wonderful.
BROWN: All right.
CLINTON: And the people who live there need to have a president who
understands it, will listen to them and be responsive.
BROWN: All right, Senator Clinton.
Senator Obama, go ahead please.
OBAMA: Well, this is an area where Senator Clinton and I almost
entirely agree. I think that the key is to consult with local
communities, whether it's on the commercial interests or the
environmental stakes of creating any kind of barrier.
And the Bush administration is not real good at listening. That's
not what they do well.
And so I will reverse that policy. As Senator Clinton indicated,
there may be areas where it makes sense to have some fencing. But for
the most part, having border patrolled, surveillance, deploying
effective technology, that's going to be the better approach.
The one thing I do have to say, though, about this issue is, it is
very important for us, I think, to deal with this problem in terms of
thousands of -- hundreds of thousands of people coming over the borders
on a regular basis if we want to also provide opportunity for the 12
million undocumented workers who are here.
OBAMA: Senator Clinton and I have both campaigned in places like
Iowa and Ohio and my home state of Illinois, and I think that the
American people want fairness, want justice. I think they recognize
that the idea that you're going to deport 12 million people is
ridiculous, that we're not going to be devoting all our law enforcement
... to sending people back.
But what they do also want is some order to the process. And so,
we're not going to be able to do these things in isolation. We're not
going to be able to deal with the 12 million people who are living in
the shadows and give them a way of getting out of the shadows if we
don't also deal with the problem of this constant influx of undocumented
And that's why I think comprehensive reform is so important. That's
the kind of leadership that I've shown in the past; that's the kind of
leadership that I'll show in the future.
One last point I want to make on the immigration issue because we
may be moving to different topics: Something that we can do immediately
that I think is very important is to pass the Dream Act, which allows
children who through no fault of their own are here but have essentially
grown up as Americans, allow them the opportunity for higher education.
OBAMA: I do not want two classes of citizens in this country.
I want everybody to prosper. That's going to be a top priority.
BROWN: OK, we've got one last question on immigration.
Jorge, go ahead.
RAMOS: (SPEAKING SPANISH) Right now, there are more than 30
million people in this country who speak Spanish.
Many of them are right here. By the year 2050, there will be 120
million Hispanics in the United States. Now, is there any downside,
Senator Clinton, to the United States becoming (SPEAKING SPANISH)
becoming a bilingual nation? Is there a limit?
CLINTON: Well, I think it's important for as many Americans as
possible to do what I have never been able to do, and that is learn
another language and try to be bilingual because that connects us to the
rest of the world.
I think it is important, though, that English remain our common
unifying language because that brings our country together in a way that
we have seen generations of immigrants coming to our shores be able to
be part of the American experience and pursue the American dream.
You know, I have been adamantly against the efforts by some to make
English the official language. That I do not believe is appropriate,
and I have voted against it and spoken against it.
CLINTON: I represent New York. We have 170 languages in New York
City alone. And I do not think that we should be, in any way,
discriminating against people who do not speak English, who use
facilities like hospitals or have to go to court to enforce their rights.
But I do think that English does remain an important part of the
American experience. So I encourage people to become bilingual. But I
also want to see English remain the common, unifying language of our
RAMOS: Senator Obama, is there any down side to the United States
becoming a bilingual nation?
OBAMA: Well, I think it is important that everyone learns English
and that we have that process of binding ourselves together as a
country. I think that's very important.
I also think that every student should be learning a second
language, because...
... you know, so, when you start getting into a debate about
bilingual education, for example, now, I want to make sure that children
who are coming out of Spanish-speaking households had the opportunity to
learn and are not falling behind.
OBAMA: If bilingual education helps them do that, I want to give
them the opportunity.
But I also want to make sure that English-speaking children are
getting foreign languages because this world is becoming more
interdependent and part of the process of America's continued leadership
in the world is going to be our capacity to communicate across
boundaries, across borders, and that's something frankly where we've
fallen behind.
One of the failures of No Child Left Behind, a law that I think a
lot of local and state officials have been troubled by, is that it is so
narrowly focused on standardized tests that it has pushed out a lot of
important learning that needs to take place.
And foreign languages is one of those areas that I think has been
neglected. I want to put more resources into it.
BROWN: All right.
We're going to take a quick break. We've got to go to a
commercial. We'll be back with a lot more. There is also a debate we
should mention raging online right now. Go to our Web site,, and join in. The debate here at the University of
Texas in Austin continues right after this.
BROWN: And we are back. We're here in Austin, Texas, the capital
city. Welcome back to the Texas Democratic debate at the University of
Texas, Austin.
The first question now goes to John King.
KING: Senator, as I'm sitting here, we're about 45 minutes into the
discussion tonight, and I'm having what I like to call one of those
parallel universe moments.
I've been watching each of you give speeches in arenas not unlike
this one individually. And the tone is often quite different than the
very polite, substantive discourse we've had tonight.
And so, I want to ask you about that. There are times when each of
you seems to call into question the other one's credibility or truthfulness.
And, Senator Clinton, I want to talk specifically about some words
you've spoken here in the state of Texas over the past couple of days.
You've said, quote, "My opponent gives speeches; I offer solutions."
You said the choice for Democrats in this campaign is, quote, "talk
versus action."
Now, in a campaign that some of us are old enough to remember, maybe
not many of the students here, this would be called the "Where's the
beef?" question.
But, since we're in Texas, I'd like to borrow a phrase that they
often use here and you've used yourself in the context of President
Bush. Are you saying that your opponent is all hat and no cattle, and
can you say that after the last 45 minutes?
CLINTON: Well, I have said that about President Bush, and I think
our next president needs to be a lot less hat and a lot more cattle.
You know, I think you can tell from the first 45 minutes, you know,
Senator Obama and I have a lot in common. We both care passionately
about our country. We are devoted to public service. We care deeply
about the future, and we have run a very vigorous and contested primary
campaign, which has been by most standards, I think, very positive and
extremely civil.
CLINTON: But there are differences between us. And I think, in our
efforts to draw those contrasts and comparisons, we obviously try to let
voters know how we see the world differently.
And I do offer solutions. That's what I believe in and what I have
done. And it's what I offer to voters because it's part of my life,
over the last 35 years, working to get kids health care, working to
expand legal services for the poor, working to register voters, working
to make a difference. Because I think that this country has given me so
And there are differences between our records and our
accomplishments. I have to confess, I was somewhat amused, the other
night, when, on one of the TV shows, one of Senator Obama's supporters
was asked to name one accomplishment of Senator Obama, and he couldn't.
So I know that there are comparisons and contrasts to be drawn
between us. And it's important that voters get that information. So,
yes, I do think that words are important and words matter, but actions
speak louder than words. And I offer...
BROWN: Senator Obama, go ahead.
BROWN: Senator Obama, do you want to respond?
OBAMA: Well, I think actions do speak louder than words, which is
why over the 20 years of my public service I have acted a lot to provide
health care to people who didn't have it, to provide tax breaks to
families that needed it, to reform a criminal justice system that had
resulted in wrongful convictions, to open up our government and to pass
the toughest ethics reform legislation since Watergate, to make sure
that we create transparency...
... to make sure that we create transparency in our government so
that we know where federal spending is going and it's not going to a
bunch of boondoggles and earmarks that are wasting taxpayer money that
could be spent on things like early childhood education.
You know, I think if you talk to those wounded warriors at Walter
Reed who, prior to me getting to the Senate, were having to pay for
their meals and have to pay for their phone calls to their family while
they're recovering from amputations, I think they've said that I've
engaged not just in talk, but in action.
OBAMA: Now, I think that Senator Clinton has a fine record and I
don't want to denigrate that record. I do think there is a fundamental
difference between us in terms of how change comes about. Senator
Clinton of late has said: Let's get real. The implication is that the
people who've been voting for me or involved in my campaign are somehow
And that, you know, the 20 million people who've been paying
attention to 19 debates and the editorial boards all across the country
at newspapers who have given me endorsements, includng every major
newspaper here in the state of Texas.
OBAMA: You know, the thinking is that somehow, they're being duped,
and eventually they're going to see the reality of things.
Well, I think they perceive reality of what's going on in Washington
very clearly. What they see is that if we don't bring the country
together, stop the endless bickering, actually focus on solutions and
reduce the special interests that have dominated Washington, then we
will not get anything done. And the reason that this campaign has done
so well...
The reason that this campaign has done so well is because people
understand that it is not just a matter of putting forward policy
OBAMA: Senator Clinton and I share a lot of policy positions. But
if we can't inspire the American people to get involved in their
government and if we can't inspire them to go beyond the racial
divisions and the religious divisions and the regional divisions that
have plagued our politics for so long, then we will continue to see the
kind of gridlock and nonperformance in Washington that is resulting in
families suffering in very real ways.
I'm running for president to start doing something about that
suffering, and so are the people who are behind my campaign.
BROWN: I think one of the points -- I think one of the points that
John King was alluding to in talking about some of Senator Clinton's
comments is there has been a lot of attention lately on some of your
speeches, that they are very similar to some of the speeches by your
friend and supporter Deval Patrick, the governor of Massachusetts, and
Senator Clinton's campaign has made a big issue of this. To be blunt,
they've accused you of plagiarism.
OBAMA: Right.
BROWN: How do you respond?
OBAMA: Well, look, the -- first of all, it's not a lot of
speeches. There are two lines in speeches that I've been giving over
the last couple of weeks.
I've been campaigning now for the last two years. Deval is a
national co-chairman of my campaign, and suggested an argument that I
share, that words are important. Words matter. And the implication
that they don't I think diminishes how important it is to speak to the
American people directly about making America as good as its promise.
Barbara Jordan understood this as well as anybody.
OBAMA: And the notion that I had plagiarized from somebody who was
one of my national co-chairs...
... who gave me the line and suggested that I use it, I think, is
silly, and...
... you know, this is where we start getting into silly season, in
politics, and I think people start getting discouraged about it...
... and they don't want...
What they want is, how are we going to create good jobs and good wages?
How are we going to provide health care to the American people?
How are we going to make sure that college is affordable?
So what I've been talking about, in this speeches -- and I've got to
admit, some of them are pretty good.
What I've been talking about is not just hope and not just
inspiration. It's a $4,000 tuition credit for every student, every
year, in exchange for national service...
... so that college becomes more affordable.
OBAMA: I've been talking about making sure that we change our tax
code so that working families actually get relief. I have been talking
about making sure that we bring an end to this war in Iraq so that we
can start bringing our troops home and invest money here in the United
So just to finish up, these are very specific, concrete, detailed
proposals, many of them which I have been working on for years now.
Senator Clinton has a fine record. So do I. I'm happy to have a debate
on the issues, but what we shouldn't be spending time doing is tearing
each other down. We should be spending time lifting the country up.
BROWN: Senator Clinton, is it the silly season?
CLINTON: Well, I think that if your candidacy is going to be about
words, then they should be your own words. That's, I think, a very
simple proposition.
And, you know, lifting whole passages from someone else's speeches
is not change you can believe in, it's change you can Xerox. And I just
don't think...
OBAMA: Come on.
CLINTON: No, but, you know, but, Barack, it is.
Because, you know, if you look -- if you look -- if you look at the
YouTube of these videos, it does raise questions.
Now, there is no doubt that you are a passionate, eloquent speaker,
and I applaud you for that. But when you look at what we face in this
country, we do need to unite the country, but we have to unite it for a
purpose around very specific goals.
CLINTON: It is not enough to say, "Let's come together." We know
we're going to have to work hard to overcome the opposition of those who
do not want the changes to get to universal health care.
You know, when I proposed a universal health care plan, as did
Senator Edwards, we took a big risk, because we know it's politically
controversial to say we're going to cover everyone.
And you chose not to do that. You chose to put forth a health care
plan that will leave out at least 15 million people. That's a big
When I said we should put a moratorium on home foreclosures,
basically your response was, well, that wouldn't work.
And, you know, in the last week, even President Bush has said we
have to do something like that.
I just believe that we've got to look hard at the difficult
challenges we face, especially after George Bush leaves the White House.
CLINTON: The world will breathe a sigh of relief once he is gone.
We all know that.
But then we've got to do the hard work of not just bringing the
country together, but overcoming a lot of the entrenched opposition to
the very ideas that both of us believe in, and for some of us have been
fighting for, for a very long time. You know, when I took on...
When I took on universal health care back in '93 and '94, it was
against a firestorm of special interest opposition. I was more than
happy to do that, because I believe passionately in getting quality
affordable health care to every American.
I don't want to leave anybody out. I see the results of leaving
people out. I am tired of health insurance companies deciding who will
live or die in America.
BROWN: All right, Senator Clinton, thank you.
Senator Obama, please respond.
OBAMA: Well, I think that Senator Clinton mentioned two specific
issue areas where we've got some differences. I'm happy to debate
those, which is what I think should be the focus of this campaign. We
both want universal health care.
When I released my plan a few months later, we were in a debate and
Senator Clinton said we all want universal health care. Of course, I
was down 20 points in the polls at the time, and so my plan was pretty
good. It's not as good now, but my plan hasn't changed. The politics
have changed a little bit.
We both -- 95 percent of our plans are similar. We both want to set
up a system in which any person is going to be able to get coverage that
is as good as we have as members of Congress. And we are going to
subsidize those who can't afford it.
OBAMA: We're going to make sure that we reduce costs by emphasizing
prevention. And I want to make sure that we're applying technology to
improve quality, cut bureaucracy.
Now, I also want to make sure that we're reducing costs for those
who already have health insurance. So we put in place a catastrophic
reinsurance plan that would reduce costs by $2,500 per family per year.
So we've got a lot of similarities in our plan. We've got a
philosophical difference, which we've debated repeatedly, and that is
that Senator Clinton believes the only way to achieve universal health
care is to force everybody to purchase it.
And my belief is, the reason that people don't have it is not
because they don't want it but because they can't afford it.
And so I emphasize reducing costs.
And as has been noted by many observers, including Bill Clinton's
former secretary of labor, my plan does more than anybody to reduce
costs, and there is nobody out there who wants health insurance who
can't have it.
OBAMA: Now, there are legitimate arguments for why Senator Clinton
and others have called for a mandate, and I'm happy to have that debate.
But the notion that I am leaving 15 million people out somehow
implies that we are different in our goals of providing coverage to all
Americans, and that is simply not true. We think that there's going to
be a different way of getting there.
One last point I want to make on the health care front. I admire
the fact that Senator Clinton tried to bring about health care reform
back in 1993. She deserves credit for that.
But I said before, I think she did it in the wrong way, because it
wasn't just the fact that the insurance companies, the drug companies
were battling here, and no doubt they were. It was also that Senator
Clinton and the administration went behind closed doors, excluded the
participation even of Democratic members of Congress who had slightly
different ideas than the ones that Senator Clinton had put forward.
And, as a consequence, it was much more difficult to get Congress to
OBAMA: And I've said that I'm going to do things differently. I
think we have to open up the process. Everybody has to have a seat at
the table. And most importantly, the American people have to be
involved and educated about how this change is going to be brought about.
The point is this, you know, we can have great plans, but if we
don't change how the politics is working in Washington, then neither of
our plans are going to happen, and we're going to be four years from now
debating once again how we're going to bring universal health care to
this country.
BROWN: All right, we've got some time constraints here, so we've
got to take another real quick break. Stay with us. We've got a lot
more ahead.
You can compare the candidates on the issues any time; just go to
our Web site, A lot more ahead here at the University
of Texas. We'll be right back.
BROWN: An enthusiastic crowd here at the University of Texas.
Welcome back to the Texas Democratic debate. Let's get right to
it. Jorge Ramos with the next question.
RAMOS: Senator Clinton, yesterday you said, and I'm quoting, "One
of us is ready to be commander in chief."
Are you saying that Senator Obama is not ready and not qualified to
be commander in chief?
CLINTON: Well, I believe that I am ready and I am prepared. And I
will leave that to the voters to decide.
But I want to get back to health care, because I didn't get a chance
to respond after Senator Obama finished. No, let me finish, Jorge...
RAMOS: But I would like to come back...
CLINTON: This is a significant difference. You know, Senator Obama
has said it's a philosophical difference. I think it's a substantive
He has a mandate for parents to be sure to ensure their children. I
agree with that. I just know that if we don't go and require everyone
to have health insurance, the health insurance industry will still game
the system. Everyone of us with insurance will pay the hidden tax of
approximately $900 a year to make up for the lack of insurance.
And you know, in one of our earlier debates, John Edwards made a
great point. It would be as though Social Security were voluntary.
Medicare, one of the great accomplishments of President Johnson, was
I do not believe that is going to work. So it's not just a
philosophical difference.
CLINTON: You look at what will work and what will not work. If you
do not have a plan that starts out attempting to achieve universal
health care, you will be nibbled to death, and we will be back here with
more and more people uninsured and rising costs.
BROWN: All right. We appreciate that you want to make a point,
Senator Obama. We have limited time, so I would like Jorge to move on
to another subject or we're going to be out of time.
OBAMA: Well, I understand. But I think that Senator Clinton made a...
You know, she's making a point, and I think I should have the
opportunity to respond very briefly. And I'll try to make...
BROWN: Very briefly, absolutely.
OBAMA: Number one, understand that when Senator Clinton says a
mandate, it's not a mandate on government to provide health insurance,
it's a mandate on individuals to purchase it. And Senator Clinton is
right; we have to find out what works.
OBAMA: Now, Massachusetts has a mandate right now. They have
exempted 20 percent of the uninsured because they have concluded that
that 20 percent can't afford it.
In some cases, there are people who are paying fines and still can't
afford it, so now they're worse off than they were. They don't have
health insurance and they're paying a fine.
In order for you to force people to get health insurance, you've got
to have a very harsh penalty, and Senator Clinton has said that we won't
go after their wages. Now, this is a substantive difference. But
understand that both of us seek to get universal health care. I have a
substantive difference with Senator Clinton on how to get there.
BROWN: All right, Senator Clinton?
CLINTON: Wait a minute, no, this is too important. This is the
number one issue that people talk to me about. You know, when a mother
grabs my arm and says, "I can't get the operation my son needs because I
don't have health insurance," it is personal for me.
CLINTON: And I just fundamentally disagree.
You know, Senator Obama's plan has a mandate on parents and a fine
if parents do not...
OBAMA: That's right.
CLINTON: ... insure their children.
OBAMA: That's right.
CLINTON: Because he recognizes that unless we have some kind of
restriction, we will not get there.
OBAMA: There's a reason.
CLINTON: He's also said that if people show up at a hospital sick,
without health insurance, well, maybe at that point you can fine them.
We would not have a social compact with Social Security and Medicare
if everyone did not have to participate. I want a universal health care
OBAMA: Now, that's -- that mother -- that mother who is desperate
to get health care for her child, will be able to get that health care
under my plan. Point number one.
Point number two, the reason a mandate for children can be effective
is we've got an ability to make affordable health care available to that
child, right now.
OBAMA: There are no excuses. If a parent is not providing health
care for that child, it's because the parent's not being responsible,
under my plan. And those children don't have a choice. But I think that
adults are going to be able to see that they can afford it, under my
plan; they will get it, under my plan.
And it is true that, if it turns out that some are gaming the
system, then we can impose, potentially, some penalties on them for
gaming the system.
But the notion that, somehow, I am interested in leaving out 15
million people, without health insurance, is simply not true.
BROWN: All right. Jorge...
CLINTON: We disagree on that.
BROWN: OK. Jorge -- let's let Jorge re-ask his question, because I
don't think anyone remembers that one.
RAMOS: Let me try again, and not in Spanish, OK?
Here we go again. Because we also believe the war in Iraq is very
And here's the question. Are you suggesting that Senator Obama is
not ready; he doesn't have the experience to be commander in chief?
That's a question of: What did you mean by that phrase?
CLINTON: What I mean is that, you know, for more than 15 years,
I've been honored to represent our country in more than 80 countries to
negotiate on matters such as opening borders for refugees during the war
in Kosovo, to stand up for women's rights as human rights around the
world. I've served on the Senate...
I've served on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and I have
worked as one of the leaders in the Congress on behalf of Homeland
Security in the very difficult challenges we face.
You know, just this week, it's a good example. We had elections in
Pakistan, we had change in government in Cuba -- or at least the
leadership. We've had the elections that, you know, should have
happened that haven't happened and just changed the leader the way they
do in Cuba. We've had Kosovo declaring independence, and we have had
our embassy set on fire in Serbia.
So we have serious problems that pose a real question about
presidential leadership, and also some great opportunities. You know,
we now have opportunities perhaps with Cuba, I hope with President
Musharraf, for him to do the right thing.
CLINTON: I supported the independence of Kosovo because I think it
is imperative that in the heart of Europe we continue to promote
independence and democracy. And I would be moving very aggressively to
hold the Serbian government responsible with their security forces to
protect our embassy. Under international law, they should be doing that.
So when you think about everything that is going to happen, what we
can predict and what we cannot predict, I believe that I am prepared and
ready on day one to be commander in chief, to be the president, to turn
our economy around, and to begin making a lot of these very difficult
decisions that we will inherit from George Bush. And that is what I am
putting forth to the voters.
BROWN: Senator Obama?
OBAMA: I wouldn't be running if I didn't think I was prepared to be
My number one job as president will be to keep the American people
safe. I will do whatever is required to accomplish that. I will not
hesitate to act against those that would do America harm.
Now, that involves maintaining the strongest military on earth,
which means that we are training our troops properly and equipping them
properly, and putting them on proper rotations. And there are an awful
lot of families here in Texas who have been burdened under two and three
and four tours because of the poor planning of the current
commander-in-chief, and that will end when I am president.
OBAMA: But it also means using our military wisely. And on what I
believe was the single most important foreign policy decision of this
generation, whether or not to go to war in Iraq, I believe I showed the
judgment of a commander in chief. And I think that Senator Clinton was
wrong in her judgments on that.
Now, that has consequences -- that has significant consequences,
because it has diverted attention from Afghanistan where Al Qaida, that
killed 3,000 Americans, are stronger now than at any time since 2001.
You know, I've heard from an Army captain who was the head of a
rifle platoon -- supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up
being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been
sent to Iraq.
OBAMA: And as a consequence, they didn't have enough ammunition,
they didn't have enough humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban
weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for
them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief.
Now, that's a consequence of bad judgment. And you know, the
question is, on the critical issues that we face right now, who's going
to show the judgment to lead? And I think that on every critical issue
that we've seen in foreign policy over the last several years -- going
into Iraq originally, I didn't just oppose it for the sake of opposing it.
I said this is going to distract us from Afghanistan; this is going
to fan the flames of anti-American sentiment; it's going to cost us
billions of dollars and thousands of lives and overstretch our
military. And I was right.
On the question of Pakistan, which Senator Clinton just raised -- we
just had an election there. But I've said very clearly that we have put
all our eggs in the Musharraf basket. That was a mistake. We should be
going after Al Qaida and making sure that Pakistan is serious about
hunting down terrorists, as well as expanding democracy. And I was right
about that.
On the issues that have come up that a commander in chief is going
to have to make decisions on, I have shown the judgment to lead. That is
the leadership that I want to show when I'm president of the United States.
OBAMA: On the issues that have come up, that a commander in chief
is going to have to make decisions on, I have shown the judgment to
lead. That is the leadership that I want to show when I'm president of
the United States.
BROWN: All right. We're going to stay with this and stay on Iraq.
John King?
KING: I want to continue in this vein, and hone in on the very
point you just made. Because one of you, unless this remarkable
campaign here takes another wacky, unpredictable turn, is going to be
running against a decorated war hero, who is going to say that you don't
have the experience to be commander in chief.
And you have both said, it's not about that type of experience; it's
about judgment.
You both had to make a judgment, a short time ago, in your job in
the United States Senate, about whether to support the surge. And as
that was going on, Senator Clinton, you had the commanding general in
Iraq before you. And you said, "I think that the reports provide to us
really require the willing suspension of disbelief" -- your words to
General Petraeus.
KING: I want you to look at Iraq now and listen to those who say
the security situation is better. Ideal, no, but better -- some say
significantly, in recent days, even some steps toward a political
Is Iraq today better off than it was six months or a year ago
because of the surge?
CLINTON: Well, John, I think you forget a very important premise of
the surge. The rationale of the surge was to create the space and time
for the Iraqi government to make the decisions that only it can make.
Now, there is no doubt, given the skill and the commitment of our
young men and women in uniform that putting more of them in will give us
a tactical advantage and will provide security in some places, and that
has occurred.
CLINTON: But the fact is that the purpose of it has not been
fulfilled. The Iraqi government has slowly inched toward making a few
of the decisions in a less than complete way, but it hasn't taken
advantage of the sacrifice and the losses of life and billions of
dollars that have occurred since the surge began.
That is why I have said, upon taking office I would ask the
secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and my security
advisers to give me a plan so that I could begin withdrawing our troops
within 60 days.
And I would begin that with...
... with a very clear message to the Iraqis that they no longer had
a blank check, as they had been given by President Bush, that as we
withdraw our troops, probably one to two brigades a month, they would
have to step up and make these decisions.
CLINTON: I believe that is in the best interest of our military,
which has been stretched thin.
Last night in Brownsville, you know, a woman grabbed my hand and
said, "Please, my husband's there for the third time. Bring him home."
And I told her privately what I have said publicly many times -- I
will bring him home because I do not think it is in the interest of
America or of the Iraqis that we continue to be there. It is up to the
Iraqis to decide the kind of future they will have.
BROWN: Senator Obama, in the same vein, you were also opposed to
the surge from the beginning. Were you wrong?
OBAMA: Well, I think it is indisputable that we've seen violence
reduced in Iraq. And that's a credit to our brave men and women in uniform.
In fact, you know, the 1st Cavalry, out of Fort Hood, played an
enormous role in pushing back Al Qaida out of Baghdad.
OBAMA: And, you know, we honor their service.
But this is a tactical victory imposed upon a huge strategic blunder.
And I think that, when we're having a debate with John McCain, it is
going to be much easier for the candidate who was opposed to the concept
of invading Iraq in the first place to have a debate about the wisdom of
that decision...
... than having to argue about the tactics subsequent to the decision.
Because, ultimately, that's what's at stake. Understand, not only
have we been diverted from Afghanistan. We've been diverted from
focusing on Latin America.
We contribute -- our entire foreign aid to Latin America is $2.7
billion, approximately what we spend in Iraq in a week.
OBAMA: And it is any surprise, then, that you've seen people like
Hugo Chavez and countries like China move into the void, because we've
been neglectful of that.
Iran is the single biggest strategic beneficiary of us having
invaded Iraq, and that is something that I think John McCain has to come
to terms with.
So that is a debate that I'm happy to have.
One last point I want to make on this, and that is, the incredible
burden that has been placed on the American people, starting with
military families, and the fact that we still are not doing right by our
veterans, that we still don't honor their service, that there are still
homeless veterans, that we still don't screen properly for
post-traumatic stress disorder and make sure that they're getting mental
services that they need, that we are still...
... having veterans in south Texas have to drive 250 miles to access
a veterans hospital.
OBAMA: That's unacceptable. But we talked about the economy
earlier, the fact that we're spending $12 billion every month in Iraq
means that we can't engage in the kind of infrastructure improvements
that are going to make us more competitive. It means that we can't
deliver on the kinds of health care reforms that both Senator Clinton
and I are looking for.
And that is also an argument that we have to have with John McCain
because he has said that he is willing to have these troops over there
for 100 years. The notion that we would sustain that kind of effort and
neglect not only making us more secure here at home, more competitive
here at home, allow our economy to sink. As John McCain says, he
doesn't really understand the economy that well. It is clear from his
embrace of George Bush's policies that he doesn't, and that's what I
intend to change when I am president of the United States of America.
BROWN: All right. We've got to take another quick break. We've
got a lot more ahead. Stay with us. We'll be right back.
BROWN: Welcome back to the Texas Democratic debate.
Stay with us after the debate. Anderson Cooper and the best
political team on television will have lots of analysis.
But back to the debate.
John King?
KING: Thank you.
Both of you have been harshly critical of the Bush administration
for its secrecy, what you consider overuse of secrecy and executive power.
Tonight, Senator Obama, you've talked about more transparency. You
also at one point criticized earmarks.
And yet, a recent report came out that identified you -- lower on
the list in terms how much money senators seek and sneak into the budget
for these pork barrel spending projects, but it still said you were
responsible for $91 million in earmarks.
And you have refused to say where the money went, what it's for. Why?
OBAMA: No, that's not true. We've actually disclosed, John, all
our earmarks. And so, you know, we'll be happy to provide you with that
information, because I believe very strongly in transparency.
OBAMA: As I indicated earlier, one of the things that I did last
year was to pass a bill with Tom Coburn, very conservative Republican
but a sincere fiscal conservative. And we got together and created what
we call Google for Government. It's a searchable database, where every
single dollar of federal spending is posted on the Internet, so that
ordinary voters can take a look. And if they see a bridge to nowhere
being built, they know where it's going and who sponsored it. And if
they see a no-bid contract going to Halliburton, they can check that
out, too.
And you know, the idea is that we open up the process so that the
American people can make judgments about whether or not government is
doing what it's supposed to be doing with its taxpayer money. And I've
been consistently in favor of more disclosure around earmarks.
OBAMA: Now, keep in mind, a lot of these are worthy projects in our
states. I have actively pursued projects that I think are important.
But I want to make sure that they're not done in the dark of night, that
they're not done in committee, that everybody stands up and says, "this
is the kind of spending that I think is important."
I have consistently supported those efforts. I will push for those
as president of the United States of America.
KING: Senator Clinton, as you know, I think your number was about
$342 million. You say they're worthy projects, as Senator Obama did,
for your state and that's part of your job, to get money for worthy
projects back in your state.
Senator McCain, as you know, is proud of going around the country
saying he's never asked for an earmark and he will never ask for an earmark.
On the specific issue of pork barrel spending, fiscal accountability
by the government at a time when many Americans frankly think, whether
it is the House or the Senate, that you all waste money on things that
aren't important to them, don't affect their daily lives, does he have a
better case to make to the American people that, "I have done this my
entire career; I will do it as president," on the issue of on the issue
of wasteful pork barrel spending?
CLINTON: Well, no, not at all. Because he supported the wasteful
tax cuts of the Bush administration and the Iraq war, with the billions
of dollars...
... that have been spent, and wants it to continue.
You know, when President Bush came into office, he inherited a
balanced budget and a surplus. And it is gone. And we now are looking
at a projected deficit of $400 billion, under the new Bush budget, and a
$9 trillion debt.
We borrow money from the Chinese to buy oil from the Saudis. That is
not a winning strategy for America.
I will get us back to fiscal responsibility. And I will make it
clear that the Bush tax cuts on the upper income, those making more than
$250,000 a year, will be allowed to expire.
CLINTON: Middle-class tax cuts and support for the middle class, to
make college affordable, retirement security possible, health insurance
affordable: Those will be my priorities.
And I think it's important that we look at where the money has gone
under President Bush -- no-bid contracts, cronyism, outsourcing the
government in ways that haven't saved us money and have reduced
So the larger question is, who really is going to move us toward
fiscal responsibility, and I believe that we can get back on the path we
were on. It was working well. It was one of the reasons why the
economy was booming.
I've got that, you know, clearly in my economic blueprint, which is
something that I've published the last few days, because it's part of
what we have to do again. And I think that I will be very comfortable
and effective in taking on Senator McCain over the fiscal
irresponsibility of the Republican Party that he's been a part of.
BROWN: All right.
An issue relating to the current election.
RAMOS: As we can see, this has been an extremely close nomination
battle that will come down to superdelegates. House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, the highest ranking Democrat in government, said recently, and
I'm quoting, "It would be a problem" -- and this is a question for you,
Senator Clinton -- "it would be a problem for the party if the verdict
would be something different than the public has decided."
Do you agree?
CLINTON: Well, you know, these are the rules that are followed, and
you know, I think that it will sort itself out. I'm not worried about
that. We will have a nominee, and we will have a unified Democratic
Party, and we will go on to victory in November.
BROWN: Senator Obama, go ahead. Do you have a response to Senator
OBAMA: Well, I think it is important, given how hard Senator
Clinton and I have been working, that these primaries and caucuses count
for something. And so my belief is that...
... the will of the voters, expressed in this long election process,
is what ultimately will determine who our next nominee is going to be.
OBAMA: But understand what I think is most important to the voters,
and that is that we have a government that is listening to them again.
They feel as if they've been shut out.
You know, when I meet mothers who are trying to figure out how to
get health care for their kids, it's not just the desperation of that
single mom. It's also that when they try to find some help, oftentimes
they're hitting a brick wall.
And they don't get a sense that the debates that are happening in
Washington right now relate to them at all. And what they believe is
that people are trying to get on TV and they're trying to score points
and they're trying to win elections, and that they're not interested in
knocking down the barriers that stand between the American people and
their dreams.
And I have no doubt that the Democratic Party at its best can summon
a sense of common purpose again and higher purpose for the American people.
OBAMA: And I think that the next nominee going into the November
election is going to have a lot to talk about because the American
people are tired of politics that is dominated by the powerful, by the
connected. They want their government back, and that's what I intend to
provide them when I'm nominated for president of the United States.
BROWN: We have time for just one final question, and we thought we
would sort of end on a more philosophical question. You've both spent a
lot of time talking about leadership, about who's ready and who has the
right judgment to lead if elected president.
A leader's judgment is most tested at times of crisis. I'm
wondering if both of you will describe what was the moment that tested
you the most, that moment of crisis.
BROWN: Senator Obama?
OBAMA: Well, you know, I wouldn't point to a single moment. But
what I look at is the trajectory of my life because, you know, I was
raised by a single mom. My father left when I was two, and I was raised
by my mother and my grandparents.
And, you know, there were rocky periods during my youth, when I made
mistakes and was off course. And what was most important, in my life,
was learning to take responsibility for my own actions, learning to take
responsibility for not only my own actions but how I can bring people
together to actually have an impact on the world.
And so, working as a community organizer on the streets of Chicago,
with ordinary people, bringing them together and organizing them to
provide jobs and health care, economic security to people who didn't
have it, then working as a civil rights attorney and rejecting the jobs
on Wall Street to fight for those who were being discriminated against
on the job -- that cumulative experience, I think, is the judgment that
I now bring.
OBAMA: It's the reason that I have the capacity to bring people
together, and it's the reason why I am determined to make sure that the
American people get a government that is worthy of their decency and
their generosity.
BROWN: Senator Clinton?
CLINTON: Well, I think everybody here knows I've lived through some
crises and some challenging moments in my life. And...
And I am grateful for the support and the prayers of countless
But people often ask me, "How do you do it?" You know, "How do you
keep going?" And I just have to shake my head in wonderment, because
with all of the challenges that I've had, they are nothing compared to
what I see happening in the lives of Americans every single day.
CLINTON: You know, a few months ago, I was honored to be asked,
along with Senator McCain, as the only two elected officials, to speak
at the opening at the Intrepid Center at Brooke Medical Center in San
Antonio, a center designed to take care of and provide rehabilitation
for our brave young men and women who have been injured in war.
And I remember sitting up there and watching them come in. Those
who could walk were walking. Those who had lost limbs were trying with
great courage to get themselves in without the help of others. Some were
in wheelchairs and some were on gurneys. And the speaker representing
these wounded warriors had had most of his face disfigured by the
results of fire from a roadside bomb.
CLINTON: You know, the hits I've taken in life are nothing compared
to what goes on every single day in the lives of people across our country.
And I resolved at a very young age that I'd been blessed and that I
was called by my faith and by my upbringing to do what I could to give
others the same opportunities and blessings that I took for granted.
That's what gets me up in the morning. That's what motivates me in
this campaign.
And, you know, no matter what happens in this contest -- and I am
honored, I am honored to be here with Barack Obama. I am absolutely
CLINTON: Whatever happens, we're going to be fine. You know, we
have strong support from our families and our friends. I just hope that
we'll be able to say the same thing about the American people, and
that's what this election should be about.
BROWN: All right, a standing ovation here in Austin, Texas. Our
thanks to Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton. We
appreciate your time tonight.
And to John and Jorge as well.
We also want to thank our debate partners, the University of Texas
at Austin and the Texas Democratic Party, the LBJ Library as well, and
the city of Austin.


Hillary Clinton ends tonight's Austin debate on a high note... but was it her note?!

Nope, it was a plagiarized line by John Edwards, combined with a line by Bill Clinton!

Hey Hillary... Xerox much?!

Thank you for the complete transcript--from reading that I noted that an NPR report got the order of the 'he said she said' aspect of the debate wrong. I find it very telling about the state of news media that the moderators even allowed the candidates to squabble about who wrote what--when I wanted to hear about the moratorium on mortgage foreclosures--didn't one of them say that wouldn't 'work'--I wanted to hear more about that substantive difference between the candidates. Maybe they've decided to agree on that--I hadn't heard. I also wish the debate moderators had asked the candidates when they thought they could use their Senatorial jobs to stop all the spying on us to stop. Couldn't that happen before the election?
What might concern us all is the twisting of the McCain and the lobbyist story into a McCain and the The McCain FCC letters are the crux of the story--available at this link:
Another aspect of this candidate which is way more important than any 'sex scandal' is his recent vote to authorize the use of MORE torture:

Frankly, I could care less whose lines they use, most of them have speech writers anyway, so what difference does it make?

I am more concerned that Clinton won't release her financial statements until after the primary. Why? What do the Clinton's have to hide?

Actions do speak louder than words, and this one action speaks volumes.


I know you've been covering Obama's earmarks. Last night he said that all his earmarks were disclosed. Earlier in the month you wrote that his earmarks in '05 and '06 had not been disclosed. Did he finally disclose those earmarks or did he give a bold face lie again on national television like in the NH debate and his lobbyist NH chair.

Sen. Obama has never disclosed his 2005 and 2006 earmark.s

It was a typical "soft sell" by the media. Neither one of the candidates were queried extensively by the moderator. Americans are like cattle. They will run to whichever side of the pasture that the media tells them to run to. I have said before and will say again; there is no candidate running from either side that will be a fit for America. The cattle will never be able to discern the quality of a candidate if they are encouraged to keep hurling rosy platitiudes instead of extensively defining HOW they are going to achieve their promises and then be questioned on the adverse affects of their programs. This election is the biggest media circus I have ever seen in over half a century. Be careful what you wish for, you might get something else entirely.

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets


Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on February 21, 2008 11:43 PM.

Sweet: Clinton mostly hit her marks. But emotional end may not change the trend. Austin Dem debate 4 UPDATED was the previous entry in this blog.

Sweet: CNN scores hit with Austin Democratic debate. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.