Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Sweet column: Clinton, Obama pledge to rein in over zealous, uncontrollable surrogates and staffers.


LAS VEGAS -- Careful not to rekindle a controversy over race, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama said Tuesday at a Democratic presidential debate here -- on the birthday of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. -- that they would rein in their aides and supporters.

"We're all family in the Democratic Party," Clinton said. Obama said all the Democrats were pledged to racial equality.

The debate comes before Nevada's Saturday caucus vote, the first in a western state, the first in a state with a significant Hispanic vote and the only one to feature just Obama, Clinton and John Edwards.

Because of the fireworks over race that preceded the two-hour encounter on MSNBC the last few days, the rivals seemed to take pains not to be seen as throwing elbows, especially since there's another vote coming up, Jan. 26, in South Carolina, where over half the primary voters are expected to be African Americans.

After calling a truce Monday after a quickly escalating war of words fueled by staffers and surrogates -- the most heated in the almost yearlong campaign -- Obama and Clinton were pressed about how the situation even developed.

"We both have exuberance and sometimes uncontrollable supporters," Clinton said. Asked whether Robert Johnson, the BET founder who alluded to Obama's past drug use, would continue to be part of campaign events, Clinton only said he had issued a clarifying statement.

"Our staff get overzealous," said Obama. "They start saying things that I would not say. And it is my responsibility to make sure that we're setting a clear tone in our campaign."

Obama was responding to a question about a memo a staffer compiled about Bill and Hillary Clinton and race.

Obama, the first viable African-American contender, was asked if the discussion about race was a deliberate attempt to marginalize him.

"No," said Obama. "I think what happened in Iowa is a testimony to the fact that the American public is willing to judge people on the basis of who can best deliver the kinds of changes that they're so desperately looking for."

The debate highlighted a state issue that Congress has grappled with, the storage of nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain. Obama, Clinton and John Edwards oppose Yucca, taking the popular local position. Clinton reminded Edwards he twice voted for Yucca as a senator.

The debate showed a difference in approach to the Oval Office, with Obama, running an aspirational campaign, saying he didn't see the presidency as a hands-on exercise and Clinton, stressing her readiness from "day one," saying that without skills in managing the federal bureaucracy, debacles like the handling of Hurricane Katrina cannot be avoided.


Ms. Sweet -- I heard your interview on ON POINT late yesterday (1/15), where you commented that if someone takes offense at something (re: Mrs. Clinton's comments that “….we had a president who said, ‘we’re going to do it,’”), then it's offensive regardless, that it's not necessarily rational. That’s true in some cases, but when a large number of people take offense, there's usually a historical context. I believe in this case, one reason could be LBJ's arm was twisted into signing the Civil Rights Act, and that it wouldn't have happened except for MLK. I read this sometime ago, and if you’re interested in pursuing this, you’d have to do further research to verify. But my point is the offense taken at the Senator's statement certainly is a lot more rational and justified than not.

Obama supporters still don't get it. Insulting remarks, constant accusations of racism, and statements like 'just get over it', simply antagonize those of us who voted for Clinton. It's the same tactics you over zealous Obama supporters used from day one. I also think Obama was selected, rather than elected, and the bias media has acted shamefully. I also don't think Obama is qualified to be President, and like millions of other Clinton supporters, I will not vote for Obama.

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets


Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on January 16, 2008 8:11 AM.

Sweet: At Dem Las Vegas debate, Clinton and Obama differ over governing style. Micro or Macro manager. Full transcript. was the previous entry in this blog.

Sweet: New Nevada Obama ad is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.