Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Sweet blog special: Obama fund-raising. California best state. Chicago's 60614 best zip code.

| 1 Comment

CHICAGO--White House hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has another fund-raiser in the Los Angeles area this week; California continues to be his most fertile ground to dig up campaign dollars. Goldman Sachs remains one of the top employers of Obama givers.

But his friends and supporters Chicago lead in metro area giving. Most specifially, Obama's best zip code is 60614. That near downtown zipcode also scoops in people who list their office address on official records instead of their residence.

The top zip codes for Obama are 60614 in Chicago; 10021 in Manhattan; 60611, 60610 in Chicago and 20008 in northwest Washington D.C.

for details, click below...

from the center for responsive politics.....
for their complete database LINK

BARACK OBAMA (D
Contributions by Geography
California
$11,599,156
20%

Illinois
$9,029,193
15%

New York
$7,660,948
13%

Massachusetts
$2,716,031
5%

Other States
$27,441,870
47%

Top Metro Areas:

CHICAGO
$8,612,967

NEW YORK
$6,925,004

WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VA-WV
$5,782,597

LOS ANGELES-LONG BEACH
$4,908,735

SAN FRANCISCO
$2,773,966

Top Zip Codes:

60614 (Chicago, IL)
$999,324

10021 (New York, NY)
$739,515

60611 (Chicago, IL)
$721,274

60610 (Chicago, IL)
$627,633

20008 (Washington, DC)
$477,083

20016 (Washington, DC)
$475,652

60093 (Winnetka, IL)
$471,379

10128 (New York, NY)
$466,580

10024 (New York, NY)
$433,973

20815 (Chevy Chase, MD)
$431,556

HOW TO READ THESE CHARTS: Presidential candidates generally raise the vast majority of their campaign dollars from donors in states with the largest concentrations of population and wealth: New York, California, Florida, Washington, D.C., Illinois and Texas. In addition, they may also receive significant amounts from within their home state, depending on the size of the state and the wealth of its economic base.

"No State" means that there was no state listed on contribution report.

METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are calculated from contributions of more than $200 from individuals, as reported to the Federal Election Commission. PAC dollars are not included.

NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2008 election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on Tuesday, October 16, 2007. Help! The numbers don't add up...")

Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.

====================================================================

Goldman Sachs $311,228
Lehman Brothers $226,550
Exelon Corp $189,350
Sidley Austin LLP $187,750
Citadel Investment Group $168,650
JP Morgan Chase & Co $156,580
Citigroup Inc $152,750
UBS AG $136,000
Jones, Day et al $133,325
Skadden, Arps et al $112,650
Harvard University $109,100
Kirkland & Ellis $102,601
Jenner & Block $101,772
University of California $97,108
Time Warner $92,400
WilmerHale $91,060
UBS Americas $90,480
Morgan Stanley $87,000
Viacom Inc $80,200
Mayer, Brown et al $80,130


Percent of Contributions Coded:

1 Comment

Campaign financing numbers out of the Democratic presidential race are expected to show a widening dollar lead for Obama over Hillary Clinton, and possibly another obstacle to Clinton’s effort to stay competitive in the last 10 nominating contests yet to be held.

--------------------------------
Angelinjones

California Alcohol Addiction Treatment

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on October 18, 2007 2:37 PM.

Sweet blog special: Obama raises potential of Clinton "inevitable" win in fund-raising appeal. was the previous entry in this blog.

Sweet column: Obama's convenient truth. No sign Gore will run. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.