Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Sweet Dem Gay forum special. Transcript Richardson, Clinton.

| 2 Comments

HOLLYWOOD---Partial transcript of last portion of gay-lesbian-transgender-bisexual Democratic forum.

Our next candidate, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, has

served as secretary of Energy, ambassador to the United Nations and is


a congressman representing the 3rd District of New Mexico.



Welcome, Governor Richardson. (Applause.)



MS. CARLSON: Two times in a week.



Governor Richardson, welcome. It's great to have you with us.


GOV. RICHARDSON: Thank you. Nice to be here.



MS. CARLSON: Jonathan Capehart of The Washington Post has some


questions for you.

MR. CAPEHART: Yes, Governor, thank you for being here.

In response to a question on same sex marriage at the CNN YouTube

debate, you said you would focus less on marriage and more on what's,

quote, "achievable" in terms of rights and responsibilities for same

sex couples. When will same sex marriage be achievable, and what will

you do to foster an environment where it would become achievable?

GOV. RICHARDSON: Here's my view. The nation, I believe, is on a

path to full inclusion. A president must lead that effort.


In my judgment, what is achievable is civil unions with full


marriage rights, with domestic partnership. I believe that's


achievable.


What we also need to do is redress some of the gross imbalances

of the past. If I'm elected president, I would get rid of "Don't ask,


don't tell." I didn't vote for it when I was in Congress.



When you have an America that is asking men and women to fight

and die, the last thing you need to do is give them a lecture on

sexual orientation. (Applause.)


Secondly, I would repeal another horrendous initiative that I


voted for and I regret now: DOMA. That would preclude a number of


the full partnership rights that I want to see with civil unions.



And third -- and there's another one that hasn't been focused on


today -- and that's No Child Left Behind. That has initiatives in it


that hurt diversity education.



That is achievable. Hate crimes laws are achievable. But we

have to bring the country to a position where there is public support.


All my life -- as a governor, as a congressman, as the U.N.

ambassador, as the secretary of Energy -- I'm known for getting things


done. And I'd like to get into that in some of the questions.

MR. CAPEHART: Governor, what was it about the time -- I believe

it was 1996 when DOMA was passed -- what was it about that time that

made it possible for you to actually vote for it?

GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, I was the chief deputy whip of the

Democrats at the time.

President Clinton was president. And at that time, the objective in

passing DOMA was to fight a huge assault for a constitutional


amendment in the Congress to ban marriage. It was sort of a cheap


political way to decimate a bad initiative.


Now on "don't ask, don't tell," I reached the point, even though


I was the deputy whip, that I voted against that, because it made no


sense to me. So my point is that we need to bring the country along.


You need to build public support.



You know, I like all these speeches here about how we're going to


do this or that. But what makes sense is to have a president that on


-- not only knows how to lead but how to get things done. And we need


a president too that recognizes that the country is moving in a


journey or a path of more inclusion. States are moving a lot faster.


And a president not only has to guide that but has to lead.



MR. CAPEHART: Governor, as a guest on the Don Imus show, Imus in


the Morning, in March 2006, you were asked by Imus in a gag on a

staffer if that staffer were a, quote, "maricon," which as you know is


Spanish for faggot. In your response, you repeated the epithet. But


you've since apologized and now you question -- I've seen you question


the timing of this issue coming up.



Do you not believe that you should be held responsible, held


accountable, for using that word, repeating that word?


GOV. RICHARDSON: Sure, you know, and I'm Hispanic. I felt the


sting as a kid of being stereotyped. And I apologized but I meant no


harm when I said that. It was, you know, one of those exchanges that


I was caught off guard.

No, I am not backing off. I apologize, but I think you should

look at my actions and not words.

Let me tell you what I've done as governor. All of these issues that

we've talked about today, Bill Richardson as governor has done.


Number one, I passed a hate crimes act that was based on non-

discrimination, on partnership, on -- I was the first governor to


include transgender. Number two -- (applause) -- I also passed

partnerships, domestic partnerships avoiding discrimination. I pushed


that and got it done. I'm the only governor that called a special


session to expand domestic partnership. We didn't get it done in the


last session in New Mexico; we will get it done in this next one.


I've appointed Cabinet members that are gay and lesbians. All through


my administration I have been inclusing -- inclusive of the


lesbian/gay community.



So, you know, you can talk about what mistakes people have made.


I've made plenty. And I've probably said things that I regret across


the board. But we should look at what we've done. It's not just the


speeches and the 10-point plans, but what we've done. And as a


governor, as a congressman 15 years on gay issues, I was there.


I was there at the United Nations, too. You know, we should talk


about human rights around the world, the Iraqis that are being


discriminated and targeted today. We should talk about international


issues relating to HIV and AIDS. I was there. I have fully funded in


my state HIV, AIDS initiatives across the board.


I think -- so, you know, when you ask me a question like that --


which I accept, obviously -- you should look at my record. Action


speaks louder than words.


MS. CARLSON: Yeah. Governor, I think everyone gets one mistake


on Imus. (Laughter.) (Applause.) Since I myself made one.

Before I go to Joe, I wanted to -- you're said you're calling a


special session for domestic partnerships in --

GOV. RICHARDSON: No. I did.

MS. CARLSON: Oh, you did. And how did it go?


GOV. RICHARDSON: It didn't pass.



MS. CARLSON: Yeah. Why did --


GOV. RICHARDSON: We lost by one vote.


MS. CARLSON: So I now know the answer to my question of why you

didn't call a special session for same sex marriage because you can't

get domestic partnership through.


GOV. RICHARDSON: No. Here's another thing that I did, all


right? How many states don't have DOMA? There are six; New Mexico is


one. I kept it off, I fought it. So I've done it, too -- DOMA. It


isn't in New Mexico, it isn't in five other states, it's in the rest


of the country. I kept it off. I kept it off. We killed it, so


shouldn't that count for something? (Laughter, applause.)



MS. CARLSON: Indeed. We're going to count it, okay?



GOV. RICHARDSON: All right.



MS. CARLSON: Joe -- Joe's going to count it.


MR. SOLOMONESE: That certainly does count, and you were such a


champion on attempting to get domestic partnership done in New Mexico.



But following up on the point that you made about the states

moving in the right direction and the will of the people needing to be


there, if the New Mexico legislature handed you a marriage bill, would


you sign it?

GOV. RICHARDSON: (Short pause.) The New Mexico legislature, I


am pushing it very hard to expand domestic partnership. It's the same


thing, Joe. It's a question of going through a path that is


achievable.



Now, you know, I'll give the most flowery speeches like several


that have done here. I am in this business to get things done, to


lead, to pass legislation, to bring coalitions together, to bring the


country together.

MR. SOLOMONESE: And you have been a hero on a number of issues.

I think what we're trying to get a sense of here is, when you say

the country needs to come along, we need to move people and it's

happening in the states, then if it's happening in a state and the

legislature hands you that piece of legislation, in your heart, where

are you on that issue in that sort of a circumstance?

GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, you know, in my heart, I'm doing what is

achievable. And I'm not there yet. And the country isn't there yet.


New Mexico isn't there yet. We have to bring the country on. We have


to move in the direction of making this happen.


That doesn't mean that I'm closed on this issue. It means that


you do what is achievable.


MR. SOLMONESE: I want to get to one of the other issues that you


mentioned. Under our current immigration laws, one spouse can sponsor


another to become a U.S. resident. Same-sex couples are not covered

by this law. What would you do to help binational couples, couples


who are playing by the rules, gay and lesbian couples who are playing


by the rules, but whose families are being torn apart by the current


immigration system?


GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, I believe that when you have expansion of


domestic partnership, of civil unions, it should be to all people,


regardless of where you are -- overseas, underseas, anywhere.


MR. SOLMONESE: (Chuckles.)



GOV. RICHARDSON: So there's a bill in Congress, which I have


already said I would support, to include -- because it's currently in


the immigration issue -- I know of friends of mine that have partners


in Mexico, that -- when I signed in New Mexico an executive order


expanding domestic partnership, one of my constituents has a partner


in Mexico, and my own constituent, because of the immigration law, and


his partner cannot come together. I think that's wrong. I think

that's discrimination.



MS. CARLSON: Thank you, Governor.


Melissa?



MS. ETHERIDGE: Thank you.



Do you think homosexuality is a choice, or is it biological?


GOV. RICHARDSON: It's a choice. It's --


MS. ETHERIDGE: I don't know if you understand the question.

(Soft laughter.) Do you think I -- a homosexual is born that way, or

do you think that around seventh grade we go, "Ooh, I want to be gay"?

GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, I -- I'm not a scientist. It's -- you

know, I don't see this as an issue of science or definition.

I see gays and lesbians as people as a matter of human decency. I see

it as a matter of love and companionship and people loving each other.


You know I don't like to categorize people. I don't like to, like,


answer definitions like that that, you know, perhaps are grounded in

science or something else that I don't understand.


MS. ETHERIDGE: Well, it's hard when you are a citizen of a


country that tells you that you are making a choice when you were born

that way, and your Creator made you that way. And there's a document


that was written 200 years ago that says you are entitled to certain


rights that you are not given.



How can there be anything other than absolute equal rights for


homosexuals?



GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, that's -- that's always been my view, as

I said. As a Hispanic, I grew up with people thinking because of my

darker skin and my -- you know, I didn't -- I wasn't fully speaking

English at a time, that I was not equal. So I understand that issue


of inequality, and so across the board I've always felt that every


human being desires the same rights, desires the same niche in our


society. And you know, I've -- all my life I've striven very hard to


deal with the civil rights issue, on immigration issues affecting


families. I've always held these ideals very high, and my record


speaks for it.



MS. ETHERIDGE: I've lived in your state. I've lived in Santa


Fe, beautiful, beautiful place. How's the bark beetle infestation


going? (Laughter.)



GOV. RICHARDSON: It's still a problem.


MS. ETHERIDGE: Yeah.


GOV. RICHARDSON: They're still a problem.


MS. ETHERIDGE: That's -- environmentally, I hope you can do

something.


MS. CARLSON: Governor Richardson, can I interrupt the bark

beetle? (Laughter.)

I wanted to ask you, people who are opposed to equality for gays

and lesbians say it's a lifestyle choice and that it can be cured or

changed, and it's just chosen, it's not how you're born.

So therefore you don't get equal rights because, you know, you're just

choosing to be a certain way.


What do you say to those people that would take away rights


because it's just like, you know, choosing anything else and you can


choose back if you want? Why should it be a civil right?



GOV. RICHARDSON: Well, I don't think it's a matter of


preferences. It's a matter of equality. I would say that, you know,


gays and lesbians -- I've seen some of those -- I've gotten a lot of


letters, because I've been very outspoken on this issue, that gays and


lesbians are seeking special preferences. I don't believe that's the


case.



I think it's a matter of full equality. And this is why in my


public life, I not only have spoken about these issues, I've done it.


That's the point that I'm trying to convey, that I have issues


relating to domestic partners, issues relating to hate crimes, issues

relating to signing executive orders to protect all state employees,


issues relating to "don't ask, don't tell." I will strive to move


this country in the direction of full equality for everybody.



MS. CARLSON: Thank you, Governor. We're just about out of time.


Would you like to make a closing statement? If you want to address

the bark beetle, you may. (Laughter.)


GOV. RICHARDSON: Before I do that, I want to just say to


Melissa, I admire your efforts on behalf of fighting your fight


against breast cancer. I loved your movie, "Inconvenient Truth," the


Oscar you got.


MS. ETHERIDGE: My movie? (Laughter.) Thank you.



GOV. RICHARDSON: Just tell Al Gore not to run, please.


(Laughter.) I'm moving up. I'm moving up. I don't --



MS. ETHERIDGE: You're moving up. You're getting there. All


right. He says it's too soul-sucking. He won't do it again. So --


(laughs).


GOV. RICHARDSON: I want to lead this country because I believe I


have the most experience and because I represent change. I also

believe I'm electable.

Now I notice how a lot of these candidates have talked about all

the things that they want to do and where they stand.

I want you to look at my record as a governor, as a congressman, and

see what I have done. The full range of issues that have been


discussed here, I've delivered on as a governor. And I would do the


same as president.



The issue is, how can we bring this country together to achieve


the goals of full equality? And the best barometer of that is your


record, not your speeches. The best barometer of that is who has


delivered, not your 10-point plans.


And with that closing, I ask for the support of the many people


here that support in this country full equality. (Applause.)


MS. CARLSON: Thank you, Governor. Thanks.



GOV. RICHARDSON: All right.



MS. CARLSON: Last and not least, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.


She was the first lady of Arkansas and later first lady of the United


States. She was elected to her first term as a senator from New York


in 2000 and re-elected last year.


Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. (Cheers, applause.)

Senator Clinton, welcome.



SEN. CLINTON: Thank you.



MS. CARLSON: I don't know if Senator Edwards is still here, but


from the last debate, let me go on the record. I like the coral

jacket. (Laughter.)



SEN. CLINTON: Thank you. (Laughs.)


MS. CARLSON: Joe is our first questioner for you, Senator.



Joe?



MR. SOLMONESE: Senator, thank you for being here tonight.


You've said in past settings like this and all across the country


that you would like to repeal "Don't ask, don't tell." Now, since

2003, you've sat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, the committee

that would decide this issue. Why haven't you introduced legislation

to repeal this policy?

SEN. CLINTON: Well, Joe, first, thanks for doing this and thanks

for everybody being here and having this forum.

I think the very simple answer is we didn't have a chance with

the Republican Congress and George Bush as president. And I want to

get it done when I'm president. I want to do it and have it be

successful. I don't want to try, in a Republican Congress, with a

very negative president, and have it defeated.

We're talking, now that we have a Democratic Congress, about what
steps we can take to sort of lay the groundwork so that when we do

have a change in the White House, which can't happen too soon, to suit

me -- (cheers, applause) -- we will -- we will be able to move on
that.

But I just want to sort of put it into a broader context, because

it's one of my highest priorities. I came out against don't ask/don't

tell in 1999. It was a transitional action that was taken back at the

beginning of my husband's administration because at the time, there

was such a witch hunt going on.

And we've got some veterans over here. I saw Staff Sergeant Eric

Alva, who I have met before at HRC -- (cheers, applause) -- and I was

so glad to see him when I walked in. And you know, for people who

don't know Staff Sergeant Alva's history, he was the first Marine
wounded in Iraq, recipient of a purple heart.

And 15 years ago, he could have both been refused the opportunity

to serve, but if he had gotten into the military, under the rules that

existed at the time and the attitudes that were prevalent, he could

have been court-martialed or even accused and threatened with criminal

action if he didn't reveal names of those with whom he might have had

relationships who were serving in the military.

I think -- you know, we have moved a long way on this and other

issues, but I think it's important to recall how much of an advance

don't ask/don't tell was at the time. However, it was not implemented

appropriately. It was still used to discharge a lot of patriotic men

and women who were serving our country, often at great cost, in the

middle of a war where people were being told, "We don't need your
services anymore," including, you know, linguists and translators and

other specialty services.

But in 1999, you know, it just struck me that it wasn't working

and that what we need to do was to try to move us toward using the

Code of Military Justice and judge people on conduct, not status. No
matter whether you're, you know, gay or straight, that's the way it
should be, it should be even-handed across the entire services.

We're beginning to see some changes.
I remember very well the intense debates about this back in '93, and
honestly, it was so emotional in the military and in the Congress that

-- the Congress did pass a law, so we have to get the law repealed.

But now it's beginning to change. Former Joint Chiefs of Staff

Chairman General Shalikashvili has just come out in favor of a change.

I've noticed General Powell, who was adamantly against my husband's

efforts back in '93, has begun to say, you know, maybe we should
rethink this. So I think we will lay the groundwork, but then when

I'm president, we'll get it done, and I'm looking forward to doing

that. (Applause.)

MS. CARLSON: Thank you --

MR. SOLMONESE: Changing tracks, talk to us about what is at the

heart of your opposition to same-sex marriage?

SEN. CLINTON: Well, Joe, I prefer to think of it as being very

positive about civil unions. (Laughter.) You know, it's a personal
position, and you and I have talked about it. I've talked about it

with a number of my friends here and across the country. And, you

know, for me, we have made it very clear in our country that we

believe in equality. How we get to full equality is the debate we're
having, and I am absolutely in favor of civil unions with full

equality -- full equality of -- of benefits, rights, and privileges.

And I've also been a very strong supporter of letting the states

maintain their jurisdiction over marriage, and I believe that was the

right decision, for a lot of reasons. Because it's easy, again, to

forget that just two and a half years ago we were facing all of these

referenda that were enshrining discrimination in state constitutions.

And a lot of people tried very hard to fight against them and prevent

them from being passed, but unfortunately, they were.

Now, two and a half years later, we're beginning to see other

states take different approaches. And what we were able to do -- and

I really give HRC a lot of credit for your leadership on this -- in
stopping the federal marriage amendment gave the states the breathing

room to make different decisions. So I want to proceed with

equalizing federal benefits. I want to repeal Section 3 of DOMA,

which stands in the way of the extension of benefits to people in

committed, same-sex relationships, and, you know, I will be very

strongly in favor of doing that as president.
MR. SOLMONESE: I wonder, Senator, if you can sympathize with the
frustration of this argument that it's a states' rights issue; it's a

-- in the civil rights struggle, this argument that it was a states'

rights issue was something that was typically used against people

working against us, as sort of a red herring. And so can you see
where this argument as --marriage as a states' rights issue would
resonate the same way in our community?

SEN. CLINTON: Absolutely. And you know, Joe, not only that; I

really respect the advocacy that the community is waging on behalf of

marriage. I think you're doing exactly what you need to do and should

do. And I really am very much impressed by the -- you know, the

intensity and the persistence of that advocacy.

But this has not been a long-term struggle yet, and I think it's

really clear that, you know, people in the states are moving much more

rapidly to deal with the inequalities than you would find at the

federal level. When you and I were plotting strategy to beat the
Federal Marriage Amendment, the reason we were plotting strategy is,

we were worried it was going to pass.

And you know, again, I mean, this was a terrifying prospect, that

we would have enshrined in the Constitution, for the first time ever,

discrimination. And we were, you know, very clear about what we
needed to do to get the votes in order to prevent this mean-spirited,

divisive effort, led by Karl Rove, to politicize the hopes and dreams

of, you know, so many of our fellow Americans. And we were able to

defeat it.


But I don't know that we could have defeated it if we had not had
DOMA.
I mean, that is something that, you know, has provided a great

protection against what was clearly the Republican strategy, lest by

George Bush, led by the congressional Republicans, to just cynically
use marriage as a political tool.


MS. CARLSON: Do you think that's going to come up this time --

SEN. CLINTON: No.

MS. CARLSON: -- when the Republicans are running? Is it dead as

an issue?

SEN. CLINTON: You know, Margaret, that's what I am -- you know,

I'm very -- I'm very optimistic because I think that --

MS. CARLSON: I haven't heard it yet.


SEN. CLINTON: I -- I don't hear it either, and I'm as -- don't

tell anybody, but I'm running for president -- (laughter) -- and so

I'm traveling around the country a lot --

MS. CARLSON: "Don't ask, don't tell." (Light laughter.)

SEN. CLINTON: Yeah, that's right. And I -- you know, I don't

hear it, I don't feel it, I don't see it; even with the Republicans
with their various forms, you don't get the sense. Why? Because a

lot of people who were in favor of that constitutional amendment knew

better. That was a strictly cynical political ploy on their part, and

they were successful, unfortunately, in a lot of states. But I think
that now people are starting to say, well, you know, maybe we don't

want to do that, and because the Democratic Congress won't bring up
the amendment, there's really nothing for them to be rallying around.

MS. CARLSON: Thank you, Senator.

Melissa?


MS. ETHERIDGE: Senator, I have a personal issue here. I
remember when your husband was elected president. I actually came out
public -- publicly during his inaugural week. It was a very hopeful
time for the gay community. For the first time, we were being
recognized as American citizens. It was wonderful. We were very,
very hopeful, and in the years that followed, our hearts were broken.
We were thrown under the bus. We were pushed aside. All those great
promises that were made to us were broken.
And I understand politics. I understand how hard things are, to bring
about change. But it is many years later now, and what are you going

to do to be different than that? I know you're sitting here now; it's

a year out -- more than a year. A year from now, are we going to be

left behind like we were before?

SEN. CLINTON: Well, you know, obviously, Melissa, I don't see it

quite the way that you describe, but I respect your feeling about it.

You know, from the moment that Bob Hattoy spoke at the Democratic

Convention, through the appointments that were made both to positions

in Cabinet agencies as well as in the White House, to the ongoing
struggle against Gingrich and the Republican majority, I think that we

certainly didn't get as much done as I would have liked, but I believe

that there was a lot of honest effort going on by the president, the

vice president and the rest of us who were trying to keep the momentum

going.

You know, I remember when I was running for the Senate as first
lady marching in the gay pride parade in New York City, and to a lot

of people that was just, you know, an unbelievable act, you know, and

--

MS. ETHERIDGE: Why not be the leader now?

SEN. CLINTON: Well, I think -- I think I am a -- I think I am a

leader now. And I think that we are doing a lot to not only talk
about laws, as important as they are, but to really try to change

attitudes and persuade people that they should be more open, more

respectful, more accepting.

If I were sitting where you're sitting, with all you have gone
through in the last 14 years, I'm sure I would feel exactly the same
way because, you know, not only did you bravely come out, but you've
had health challenges and so much else.
And so time can't go by slowly. You want things to move as quickly as
possible, which I, you know, understand and wish could happen as well.

But as president, I think I have an opportunity both to reverse

the concerted assault on people. It wasn't just on people's rights;

it was on people. It was pointing fingers; it was demeaning; it was

degrading; it was mean-spirited. And that will end. That is going to

be -- that is over. And when we began to -- (applause).

MS. CARLSON: Senator, we're almost out of time, believe it or
not.

SEN. CLINTON: Oh, I can't believe it.

MS. ETHERIDGE: I know.

MS. CARLSON: Time flies when you're having a good time, but
Jonathan -- (cross talk, laughter). To be continued, Melissa.

Jonathan.

MR. CAPEHART: Real fast, Senator, Joint Chiefs Chairman --

former Joint Chiefs Chairman Peter Pace called homosexuality immoral.
And when you were first asked about it, you said, quote, "I'm going to

leave that to others to conclude." The next day, after much

criticism, you finally said you did not think that homosexuality was

immoral. Why didn't you say that the first time?

SEN. CLINTON: Well, it was a mistake, Jonathan. Because what I

went on to say after what you quoted was to launch an attack on "don't

ask, don't tell." You know, because my view was that as a chairman of

the Joint Chiefs, he had absolutely no right to say what he said. I
disagreed with him profoundly.

But what was really offensive is that he was in a position of
responsibility that had a direct impact on the lives of, you know,
hundreds of thousands of these young people in the military. So I
went right at him on "don't ask, don't tell." And I, you know -- you
know, you say these things. You know, somebody sticks a microphone in
front of you. And I thought, well, that's -- you know, that was
pretty good. And my friends started calling me and saying, well, you
know, that wasn't very good. (Laughter.)
So I said, you know, "Oh, you're probably right." So I immediately
got the first opportunity I could to, you know, say the whole thing.

So I just was -- I was focused on one aspect of what I thought

was really over the line. You know, Joe Blow, Joe Schmo walking down

the street can say, "Here's what I believe." You say, "Oh, well, who

cares?" The chairman of the Joint Chiefs says it, that has a direct

impact on policy. And that's what I went after. But I -- I should

have put it in a broader context.

MR. CAPEHART: Senator, would you put someone --

MS. CARLSON: Senator, we -- well, we are just about out of time,
Jonathan. I'm really sorry.

MR. CAPEHART (?): Who's anti-gay?

MS. CARLSON: I'm sorry; what, Jonathan?

MR. CAPEHART: Would you put someone on the bench who is known to

be anti-gay?


SEN. CLINTON: No. And that's why we shouldn't. (Cheers,
applause).

MS. CARLSON: Senator --

SEN. CLINTON: It's one of the reasons why I'm against Southwick

for -- (inaudible word) -- judge.

MS. CARLSON: Senator, you told the AFL-CIO on Tuesday night,

"I'm your girl." Do you want to express those same sentiments here?

SEN. CLINTON: I AM your girl! Absolutely! (Laughter, cheers,

applause.)

MS. CARLSON: And you do get a closing statement, short though it

may be.


SEN. CLINTON: Well, you know, I want to be a president who
really does move forward the agenda of progress and equality in our
country. That's what I have tried to do my entire life, you know, for

35 years. You know, this country, with all of its flaws, which we can

see manifest -- it doesn't move fast enough, it doesn't do what we




want it to do -- has demonstrated extraordinary resilience and a lot
of movement forward. And I think that we will see that as the years
unfold. And I want to be a part of that.

But I come to these issues, you know, not as a senator or as a
lawyer or as a presidential candidate, but as a friend of a lot of
members of the LGBT community who have, as my -- who are my age, who
have suffered through a long period of, you know, coming out, of
having to face families, of having to deal with all of the issues that
we know occur.
And I want to be a president who can clearly say to the American

people, you know, these are our friends, our children, our parents;

these are people who we want to support as they live the best lives

they can.

So it's very personal for me. And we are not going to agree on

everything, but I will be a president who will fight for you, will

work to end discrimination in the employment area, end "don't ask,

don't tell," finally get hate crimes through, do a lot of what we need

to do on HIV/AIDS and so much more. And I really hope that we can be

partners in trying to make our country a little bit better and a
little more progressive for all of us.

Thank you. (Applause.)

MS. CARLSON: Senator, I wish we had more time. Thank you.

SEN. CLINTON: (Laughs.) Me too! Yeah, me too!

MS. CARLSON: That concludes our forum, but the campaign is only

heating up from now to Election Day 2008. Stay informed, follow the

campaign and join with LGBG Americans across the nation to debate the

issues at visiblevote08.com and at hrc.org.

On behalf of Logo and the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, thank

you to our panelists: Jonathan Capehart, Melissa Etheridge and Joe
Solomonese. And thank you, Senator Clinton and here in Los Angeles

and at home, for joining us.


Right now, CBS News on Logo reports live from right here in this

studio with a post-forum wrap-up. Stick around for the interviews and
analysis.


Thank you and good night. (Applause.)

####

END


2 Comments

Have you ever wanted to trade the forex markets for regular monthly profits? You can if you harm your-self with the right knowledge. I have been doing it for over 12 months now.

Forget expensive courses that simply go over the free stuff in another way. And forget trading robots. They do not work. My simple 15 minute bar scalping system does work.

Go here to read about it. Scalp Forex Markets

Give it a go. You can trade a demo account for a while and get a feel for it.

Millions are currently adverse the blackmail of foreclosure or are absolutely activity

through foreclosure affairs appropriate now. Despite the actuality that this has abominably

become article of a trend lately, alive that others are activity through it as able-bodied

does not abate the affliction and annoyance of foreclosure.
The acumen for accepting to go through a foreclosure usually has to do with not

actuality able to accomplish ends accommodated - not alone with mortgage payments, but with

all banking obligations. In added words: it's a money thing. If you are activity through a

foreclosure, you are apparently adverse a cardinal of abundant banking worries that alone

add to your problems: car payments, ascent acclaim agenda bills, and alike aggravating to

appear up with hire so you can acquisition a abode to alive afterwards you leave your home.
Loans for bodies in foreclosure can be aloof what are bare to get through a boxy time in

their lives. If you are in charge of a claimed loan, new acclaim card, or a new mortgage

accommodation appropriate now, actuality are 4 tips for accepting a loan:
1. A foreclosure saps your already-strained banking resources
If you are currently in foreclosure, you are already beggared for cash. Now, you face

affective out of your home and award about new to live. This can force you to acquire a

cardinal of accompanying costs, such as the amount of analytic for a new abode to live, the

amount of demography time off of assignment to accomplish the move, affairs some new

furnishings, and alike advantageous for movers and gas. All of these added costs aloof add

to the accountability of what is already a actual boxy banking bearings for you.
2. You can get a mortgage or auto accommodation alike if you accept bad credit
The acceptable account is that there is an absolute cottage industry of appropriate

lenders who are committed to extending auto and new mortgage loans to bodies adverse

foreclosure. This is alike accurate if your acclaim account is currently dismal, accustomed

that it has been aged by this accomplished process.
3. You can still get acclaim cards alike if you accept bad credit Having addition acclaim

agenda appropriate now may be the aftermost affair you anticipate you need, but anticipate

again. A new acclaim agenda can accommodate you with the adeptness to accomplish concise

purchases to advice you through this alteration time, afterwards which you can set up a

abbreviate time aeon to pay it down.
Trouble is, with accepted acclaim agenda companies it can be adamantine to get accustomed

for a new acclaim agenda aback you are activity through a foreclosure or accept bad credit.

Fortunately, there are assorted acclaim agenda companies who are added than accommodating

to accessible a agenda for bodies in your situation. Of course, you may accept to pay a

college absorption amount than if you had arch credit. But, if you attending at this as a

concise accommodation to get you through this boxy time and you pay it aback bottomward

quickly, the college absorption ante will not amount you abundant extra.
4. You can alike get an apart claimed loan
Even for bodies activity through foreclosure, it is alike absolutely accessible to

defended an apart claimed loan. "Unsecured" artlessly agency that you do not accept to put

up any accessory for the loan. You aloof get the loan, no questions about accessory asked.

You can use a claimed accommodation for annihilation you like, including advantageous added

costs during your accepted alteration aeon or alike demography a vacation with your

ancestors while you array out what you are activity to do next.
Loans for bodies in foreclosure are a reality. Today, there are dedicated, absolutely

accepted lenders in the banking bazaar who apperceive that times are tough, and they are

accommodating to advice you get through this asperous patch.

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on August 10, 2007 11:25 AM.

Sweet Dem Gay forum special. Partial transcript. Will post full transcript later. was the previous entry in this blog.

Sweet column: At Dem gay forum, Melissa Etheridge tells Clinton Pres. Clinton threw gays "under the bus." Richardson says gay by choice. Obama says civil unions almost as good as marriage. Edwards disagrees. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.