Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Bush: Stem cell veto message.

| 2 Comments

President Bush's first veto..his message on stem cells.......

Subj: REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON STEM CELL RESEARCH POLICY
Date: 7/19/06 3:01:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From: Press.Releases@WhiteHouse.Gov (White House Press Releases)
Sender: bounce-258122-1239838@list.whitehouse.gov
Reply-to: Press.Releases@WhiteHouse.Gov (White House Press Releases)
To: lsweet3022@aol.com (WH Press Releases)

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release July 19, 2006

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT

ON STEM CELL RESEARCH POLICY

The East Room

2:08 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. Congress has just passed and sent to my
desk two bills concerning the use of stem cells in biomedical research.
These bills illustrate both the promise and perils we face in the age of
biotechnology. In this new era, our challenge is to harness the power
of science to ease human suffering without sanctioning the practices
that violate the dignity of human life. (Applause.)

In 2001, I spoke to the American people and set forth a new policy on
stem cell research that struck a balance between the needs of science
and the demands of conscience. When I took office, there was no federal
funding for human embryonic stem cell research. Under the policy I
announced five years ago, my administration became the first to make
federal funds available for this research, yet only on embryonic stem
cell lines derived from embryos that had already been destroyed.

My administration has made available more than $90 million for research
on these lines. This policy has allowed important research to go
forward without using taxpayer funds to encourage the further deliberate
destruction of human embryos.

One of the bills Congress has passed builds on the progress we have made
over the last five years. So I signed it into law. (Applause.)
Congress has also passed a second bill that attempts to overturn the
balanced policy I set. This bill would support the taking of innocent
human life in the hope of finding medical benefits for others. It
crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect, so I
vetoed it. (Applause.)

Like all Americans, I believe our nation must vigorously pursue the
tremendous possibility that science offers to cure disease and improve
the lives of millions. We have opportunities to discover cures and
treatments that were unthinkable generations ago. Some scientists
believe that one source of these cures might be embryonic stem cell
research. Embryonic stem cells have the ability to grow into
specialized adult tissues, and this may give them the potential to
replace damaged or defective cells or body parts and treat a variety of
diseases.

Yet we must also remember that embryonic stem cells come from human
embryos that are destroyed for their cells. Each of these human embryos
is a unique human life with inherent dignity and matchless value. We
see that value in the children who are with us today. Each of these
children began his or her life as a frozen embryo that was created for
in vitro fertilization, but remained unused after the fertility
treatments were complete. Each of these children was adopted while
still an embryo, and has been blessed with the chance to grow up in a
loving family.

These boys and girls are not spare parts. (Applause.) They remind us
of what is lost when embryos are destroyed in the name of research.
They remind us that we all begin our lives as a small collection of
cells. And they remind us that in our zeal for new treatments and
cures, America must never abandon our fundamental morals.

Some people argue that finding new cures for disease requires the
destruction of human embryos like the ones that these families adopted.
I disagree. I believe that with the right techniques and the right
policies, we can achieve scientific progress while living up to our
ethical responsibilities. That's what I sought in 2001, when I set
forth my administration's policy allowing federal funding for research
on embryonic stem cell lines where the life and death decision had
already been made.

This balanced approach has worked. Under this policy, 21 human
embryonic stem cell lines are currently in use in research that is
eligible for federal funding. Each of these lines can be replicated
many times. And as a result, the National Institutes of Health have
helped make more than 700 shipments to researchers since 2001. There is
no ban on embryonic stem cell research. To the contrary, even critics
of my policy concede that these federally funded lines are being used in
research every day by scientists around the world. My policy has
allowed us to explore the potential of embryonic stem cells, and it has
allowed America to continue to lead the world in this area.

Since I announced my policy in 2001, advances in scientific research
have also shown the great potential of stem cells that are derived
without harming human embryos. My administration has expanded the
funding of research into stem cells that can be drawn from children,
adults, and the blood in umbilical cords, with no harm to the donor.
And these stem cells are already being used in medical treatments.

With us today are patients who have benefited from treatments with adult
and umbilical-cord-blood stem cells. And I want to thank you all for
coming. (Applause.)

They are living proof that effective medical science can also be
ethical. Researchers are now also investigating new techniques that
could allow doctors and scientists to produce stem cells just as
versatile as those derived from human embryos. One technique scientists
are exploring would involve reprogramming an adult cell. For example, a
skin cell to function like an embryonic stem cell. Science offers the
hope that we may one day enjoy the potential benefits of embryonic stem
cells without destroying human life.

We must continue to explore these hopeful alternatives and advance the
cause of scientific research while staying true to the ideals of a
decent and humane society. The bill I sign today upholds these humane
ideals and draws an important ethical line to guide our research. The
Fetus Farming Prohibition Act was sponsored by Senators Santorum and
Brownback -- both who are here. (Applause.) And by Congressman Dave
Weldon, along with Nathan Deal. Thank you, Congressmen. (Applause.)
This good law prohibits one of the most egregious abuses in biomedical
research, the trafficking in human fetuses that are created with the
sole intent of aborting them to harvest their parts. Human beings are
not a raw material to be exploited, or a commodity to be bought or sold,
and this bill will help ensure that we respect the fundamental ethical
line.

I'm disappointed that Congress failed to pass another bill that would
have promoted good research. This bill was sponsored by Senator
Santorum and Senator Arlen Specter and Congressman Roscoe Bartlett.
Thanks for coming, Roscoe. (Applause.) It would have authorized
additional federal funding for promising new research that could produce
cells with the abilities of embryonic cells, but without the destruction
of human embryos. This is an important piece of legislation. This bill
was unanimously approved by the Senate; it received 273 votes in the
House of Representatives, but was blocked by a minority in the House
using procedural maneuvers. I'm disappointed that the House failed to
authorize funding for this vital and ethical research.

It makes no sense to say that you're in favor of finding cures for
terrible diseases as quickly as possible, and then block a bill that
would authorize funding for promising and ethical stem cell research.
At a moment when ethical alternatives are becoming available, we cannot
lose the opportunity to conduct research that would give hope to those
suffering from terrible diseases, and help move our nation beyond the
current controversies over embryonic stem cell research.

We must pursue this research. And so I direct the Secretary of Health
and Human Services, Secretary Leavitt, and the Director of the National
Institutes of Health to use all the tools at their disposal to aid the
search for stem cell techniques that advance promising medical science
in an ethical and morally responsible way. (Applause.)

Unfortunately, Congress has sent me a bill that fails to meet this
ethical test. This legislation would overturn the balanced policy on
embryonic stem cell research that my administration has followed for the
past five years. This bill would also undermine the principle that
Congress, itself, has followed for more than a decade, when it has
prohibited federal funding for research that destroys human embryos.

If this bill would have become law, American taxpayers would, for the
first time in our history, be compelled to fund the deliberate
destruction of human embryos. And I'm not going to allow it.
(Applause.)

I made it clear to the Congress that I will not allow our nation to
cross this moral line. I felt like crossing this line would be a
mistake, and once crossed, we would find it almost impossible to turn
back. Crossing the line would needlessly encourage a conflict between
science and ethics that can only do damage to both, and to our nation as
a whole. If we're to find the right ways to advance ethical medical
research, we must also be willing, when necessary, to reject the wrong
ways. So today, I'm keeping the promise I made to the American people
by returning this bill to Congress with my veto.

As science brings us ever closer to unlocking the secrets of human
biology, it also offers temptations to manipulate human life and violate
human dignity. Our conscience and history as a nation demand that we
resist this temptation. America was founded on the principle that we
are all created equal, and endowed by our Creator with the right to
life. We can advance the cause of science while upholding this founding
promise. We can harness the promise of technology without becoming
slaves to technology. And we can ensure that science serves the cause
of humanity instead of the other way around.

America pursues medical advances in the name of life, and we will
achieve the great breakthroughs we all seek with reverence for the gift
of life. I believe America's scientists have the ingenuity and skill to
meet this challenge. And I look forward to working with Congress and
the scientific community to achieve these great and noble goals in the
years ahead.

Thank you all for coming and may God bless. (Applause.)

END 2:23 P.M. EDT


---
You are currently subscribed to News White House General Media as:
lsweet3022@aol.com.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to:
leave-whitehouse-press-releases-general-media-1239838I@list.whitehouse.gov


2 Comments

Would someone tell Dictator Blagojevich to stop spending my money on junk science. Dictator Blagojevich decided to fund an immoral fraudulous project against my wishes.
The future of stem cell therapies was thrown deeper into doubt in late 2005, when a leader of the field - Woo Suk Hwang, South Korea's stem cell king" - was found to have forged key discoveries and flouted ethical protocols.

Hwang faked all research on human stem cells
Shamed South Korean cloning pioneer, Woo Suk Hwang, faked all his research on cloned human stem cells, reveals the final damning report of a probe into his work. He now faces a criminal investigation for fraud.

The “scientific basis for claiming any success are wholly lacking��? for the creation of any human embryonic stem cell lines, said a statement from the investigating panel on Tuesday.

False report
The final SNU probe reveals all the lines were faked and that data in the paper, including DNA fingerprinting and photographs, had been fabricated. Had the 11 stem cell lines been real, they would have been a proof of principle that therapies specifically tailored to individual patients – avoiding issues of immune rejection – could one day be created. http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/stem-cells

Do Blago and Kim Jung IL have the same barber? Look at their picture side by side.

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on July 19, 2006 2:03 PM.

Tony Snow briefing: On Bush stem cell bill veto; delay in sending Condi Rice to the Mideast was the previous entry in this blog.

Obama: To Iowa in September. Trip will trigger more '08 White House speculation. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.