Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Rep. Louise Slaughter: GOP moves to stifle today's House debate on Iraq War. Is this resolution necessary?

| 2 Comments

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) kicks off debate on the war, via a GOP written resolution, with a speech from the House floor at 10:45 a.m. Chicago time.

It's part of ``Iraq Week'' for President Bush and GOP leaders in Congress to rally support for the war. Dems charge the House resolution is designed just to embarrass critics.

release from Rep. Slaughter........

ANOTHER CLOSED RULE

...ONLY 10 HOURS OF DEBATE

In Anticipation of Supposed Full and Thorough 'Day of Debate', Republicans Deny Democracy, Prevent Dissention and Promote Plebiscite On Iraq Resolution

Rules Committee Passes Yet Another Closed Rule Governing H.Res 861

Washington, DC - Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (D-NY-28), Ranking Member of the House Rules Committee, today joined her Democratic colleagues on the House Rules Committee in demanding a full and open debate on H.Res. 861, the Republican Iraq war resolution to be brought to the Floor tomorrow morning.

For such an open debate to take place, the Republican-controlled Rules Committee would have had to pass an open rule governing debate on H.Res. 861. Such a rule would have permitted any Member of the House will have the ability to rise and address the body for five minutes concerning the legislation being debated and would have allowed the resolution to be amended.

Instead, House Republicans in the Rules Committee passed a closed rule, which will prevent H.Res. 861 from being amended, and will significantly constrict debate on the measure.

"Republicans have shown us tonight that they are about politics, not progress. They are willing to use the war to further their partisan agenda and try to save their majority, but they won't allow a real, honest, open- debate on the war in Iraq," said Rep. Slaughter.

"This is a serious issue, but the Majority is offering us yet another sham," Rep. Slaughter said. "It has given us its resolution, but has denied us the chance to amend it or debate it freely. We could spend ten hours or ten years debating this bill, but it wouldn't affect the course of American policy the slightest bit."

"At a time when Republicans consistently argue that the Iraq war is about the extension of democracy and freedom around the world, they have to see the overwhelming hypocrisy in preventing free expression here at home," Rep. Slaughter said. "My Democrat colleagues and I wanted to make sure that every member of the House will have a chance to have their voice heard. But that's not what the Republican Majority values."

###

2 Comments

God forbid they debate this in the open and let the truth get out and not the controlled output from the fly by media. What is she and Rham afraid of? If the Dem's cant get congress back with a mid term 2nd term GOP president w/ approval ratings in the 20's (though I saw a poll today that said 40), then Rham let his party down more than any other party head in the history of the House and should resign in SHAME!

Ann is just out there to devert from real issue like they just cut cat-7-8 veterans out of the VA So much for those of us who kept freedom of speech.As to who should resign its J Dennis Hastert with all he has done and lied about in the papers.You never say you support veterans when your voting record show you do not

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on June 15, 2006 6:18 AM.

Sweet column: Congressional travelers was the previous entry in this blog.

Rahm Emanuel: Challenges Republicans to repudiate Ann Coulter. Should they? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.