Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Sweet column: Hastert--The inside story on why he spoke out against Hayden

| 3 Comments

Here's the inside story on how the White House made a big mistake in not consulting House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert on the CIA shakeups.


After President Bush named Joshua Bolten as his new chief of staff last month, Bolten huddled with House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert in Hastert's imposing suite in the Capitol.

Bolten's courtesy call with the speaker was welcomed as the start of a renewed, closer working relationship between the House Republicans and the White House.

But even with a staff shakeup, it seems certain people in the White House are not getting it when it comes to dealing with the speaker. Bolten is not being well-served by those under him when it comes to fostering a productive relationship with Hastert.

Hastert is not one to chase cameras. By design, he rarely makes news. He has been very loyal to the president, pushing the Bush agenda on Capitol Hill. So when he went public with his criticism of Bush's nomination of Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden to be the director of the CIA, it was big news: a Republican vs. Republican storyline.

Hastert told a reporter, "I don't think a military guy should head the CIA.'' That kind of concern, however, could have been easily communicated had he been consulted beforehand. But the speaker was not informed about Hayden in advance and he did not get a heads-up that Bush wanted to oust now-former CIA chief Porter Goss, a former House member.

Hastert should have been in the White House loop. Here's why. Hastert is the nation's No. 3 leader. Even if Bush picked Hayden over Hastert's objections, at least the speaker would have been given his due. He's cleared to hear about the nation's secrets. It's not well-known, but Hastert gets a weekly National Security Council briefing.

Not helping is that Hastert talked to John Negroponte, the national intelligence director, just before the changes and did not get a hint of what was to take place.

As a practical matter, didn't the White House operation know that Hastert was close to Goss? It's ironic, but on Wednesday, in an event that had been long planned, Hastert awarded Goss a "distinguished service award'' in a ceremony in Statuary Hall.

Maybe the White House ignored Hastert because he does not vote to confirm a presidential nominee. But his words certainly influence those who do.

White House spokesman Alex Conant told me, "We realize that the speaker is upset over Porter Goss and will continue to work to address his concerns. The White House appreciates his strong leadership.''

3 Comments

Poor Dennis he was not informed.Now he see why veterans where angry when Buyer stopped the joint hearings of the Veteran Affairs Committee.We where not informed about that change until the last min.

Is it possible that Bush knew how Hastert would react and saw no point in giving him advance notice?

My take:

The man behind the scenes has a bigger ego than many think or we are just seeing more of Hastert stepping away from Bush to distance himself from the sinking Titanic.

Respectfully,
John Laesch
Democratic Candidate for Illinois' 14th District

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets

Video

Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on May 11, 2006 9:03 AM.

Gutierrez: Text of City Club speech. Blueprint for a mayoral run? was the previous entry in this blog.

Sweet column: Hillary talks about running for president. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.