Chicago Sun-Times
The scoop from Washington

Bush tells nation's Gov's: ``Tyrants control the spigots''

| No Comments

President Bush again turns to the ``U.S. as gas addicts'' theme in speech to National Governor's Association meeting.

This is the winter meeting Gov. Blagojevich is skipping.

Date: 2/27/06 12:21:44 PM Eastern Standard Time


Office of the Press Secretary


For Immediate Release February 27, 2006



State Dining Room

11:05 A.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Thanks for coming. I enjoyed it last
night, I hope you did, too. It was a lot of fun. And thank you all for
giving me a chance to come by. What I thought I'd do is say a few
things and then answer some questions, if you have any.

We have got a chance to achieve some big things for the country, to lay
the stage for peace and to keep America in the lead. And these are
goals that both Republicans and Democrats should share. You know,
there's a lot of politics here in Washington, so it's -- when you say,
well, you know, it's a Republican goal to make America competitive, I
just don't agree with that. It should be a national goal. It's a
national goal to protect our people. And, therefore, it requires a lot
of collaboration throughout all aspects of government. And no better
collaborators to implement good policy than our governors. So thanks
for giving me a chance to come and share some insights with you.

First, one question that ought to be confronting everybody is how do we
keep this economy of ours strong? A couple of notable exceptions, like
our friends in Michigan and Ohio, in particular -- maybe Washington
State -- the overall economy is in great shape. People are working,
productivity is up, people own their homes, small businesses are
flourishing. And the fundamental question is what can we do together to
keep it that way. Part of it is to be wise with taxpayers' money.

I congratulate the states that have done a good job increasing their
surpluses; it's a good thing. I can remember a couple of years ago when
we were a little worried about deficits at the state level. That's
changed. Surplus and tax policy, wise with people's money all go
hand-in-hand in terms of making sure America remains competitive. I
believe if you take money out of people's pockets it hurts economic
vitality and growth.

I know full well that in order for us to be competitive, two other
things have to happen. One is we've got to be less dependent on foreign
sources of oil. Told the people, shocked them pretty much when I was
standing up there as the guy from Texas saying our dependency on oil
creates a problem. But I meant it. Dependency upon oil has created an
economic problem for us, it challenges our economic security because
when demand for oil goes up relative to supply worldwide, it causes the
price at the pump to go up. It's like a hidden tax on our people when
gasoline prices go up. Dependence on foreign sources of oil creates a
national security problem. You hear parts of the world where there is
disruption in oil supply as a result of local politics, for example, it
affects the United States of America.

I spend a lot of time worrying about disruption of energy because of
politics or civil strife in other countries -- because tyrants control
the spigots. And it's in our national interest that we become less
dependent on oil. And so we've laid out a strong initiative to
encourage Congress to continue to spend research and development money
to enable us to power our automobiles through additional uses of
ethanol; to expand E85 beyond just the current regional -- the region
where it's being -- where the corn is being grown, to be able to use
other types of biomass to fuel our cars. We think we're very close to
that kind of breakthrough. Hybrid batteries are going to make an
enormous difference in our capacity to drive the first 40 miles in urban
centers without the use of any gasoline. Hydrogen automobiles
eventually are going to make a huge difference in enabling us to become
less dependent on foreign sources of oil.

We've got to expand solar power. I went to a facility there in Michigan
to see a fantastic company called United Solar. I don't mean to be
pushing them, but nevertheless, they're making a great product. I
remember going out to Colorado to the facility out there, the research
facility on alternative uses of energy. We've got fantastic chances to
advance this really important agenda, and we look forward to working
with you to do so. It's one of these issues where when we continue to
make these technological breakthroughs we'll leave behind a better
tomorrow for our children and grandchildren.

The other issue that I know we can work together and must work together
is to make sure our children are not only educated in reading and
writing, but also in math and science. America must be competitive in
the out years. We've got to have our -- we've got to be educating the
future physicists and engineers. And we look forward to working with
you to help make math and science in our classrooms more of a reality.

As well, we're planning on doubling the amount of federal research
dollars for basic sciences. And, recognizing that most of the research
in the United States is done at the corporate level, to make the
research and development tax credit a permanent part of the tax code.
It's really hard to get our companies to invest in research and
development if there's uncertainty in the tax code. And Congress allows
the R&D tax credit to lapse, and when it lapses, planners say, well, I'm
not sure it's going to be around, so why do we want to make investment.
So making the R&D tax credit a permanent part of our tax code will help
spur continued research and technology. Technology is going to help us
stay competitive; it'll help us be the most productive society in the
world, which means our people's standard of living is going to go up.

So here are some things we can work on, to get rid of all of the kind of
needless politics that tends to be dominating the landscape these days,
and focus on things that will help this country remain the leader in the
world when it comes to the economy.

I also want to thank those of you who have set up faith-based offices.
I'm sincere about working with state and local governments to rally the
great armies of compassion. And I know that some 32 states have set up
faith-based offices and I appreciate you doing that. It's really an
important part of making sure our social agenda is comprehensive and

I wish I could report to you that the war on terror is over. It's not.
An enemy still lurks. They're dangerous people and it requires a
comprehensive strategy to defeat, and part of it, of course, is making
sure our homeland is secure. If you have any questions on the NSA
decision, I'll be glad to give it to you -- be glad to answer them.

The other part of the offense -- of the strategy is to stay on the
offense, is to keep them on the run. And to this end I want to thank
you for supporting our Guard troops. Many of you have been overseas and
have seen our Guard troops in action. And I can't thank you enough for
not only supporting the troops in harm's way, but providing great
comfort to their families, as well.

Ultimately, the defeat of the terrorists is not only defeat them
overseas so we don't have to face them here at home, but as well, it's
to spread liberty and freedom. And the freedom agenda is a powerful
part of our country's desire to lay the foundation for peace. And it's
making a difference. It's making a difference. I know one of the
debates about the freedom agenda is, well, elections cause certain
things to happen that you may not want to happen. No, elections are
only the beginning of the process, they're not the end. Elections, plus
a focused foreign policy effort that helps build the institutions of
democracy, is what is going to be necessary to ultimately defeat the
hateful ideology of those who would do our country harm.

It's an interesting debate that's going to take place here in
Washington, or is taking place in Washington: Do elections cause
radicalism or empower radicals? My answer is, the status quo empowered
radicals. This notion that somehow the Middle East was a safe place for
the last 30 years -- because we didn't see, kind of, the turmoil that
happens with elections meant we were safe. I just totally disagree with
that, kind of the -- beneath the surface that appeared placid, the
policymakers, was resentment and hatred and planning and plotting, all
of which came home on September the 11th.

And I believe this country has got to be aggressive in our pursuit of
democracy and liberty, based upon our firm belief that there are such
things as the natural rights of men and women. After all, that's what
caused our founding, that there is universality to liberty. And we
shouldn't be surprised when 11 million Iraqis go to the polls and demand
freedom in the face of unbelievable terrorist attacks. That shouldn't
surprise America. We ought to say we recognize that spirit, and it is
that spirit that's ultimately going to be able to say we've kept the
peace for our children and grandchildren.

And so we can work together on these important issues, and I thank you
for giving me a chance for me to come by and visit with you about them.
Thank you. (Applause.)

END 11:15 A.M. EST

Leave a comment

Get the Sweet widget

More widgets


Lynn Sweet

Lynn Sweet is a columnist and the Washington Bureau Chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Stay in touch

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lynn Sweet published on February 27, 2006 11:27 AM.

This afternoon: Schakowsky, Emanuel again bash new Medicare drug benefit was the previous entry in this blog.

No dis intended: Chicago not invited to bid on '08 Dem convention-- city not interested is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.