Who needs privacy? Not you, says Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Mark Zuckerberg knows you. I mean, he really knows you.

The founder of Facebook, the social media behemoth with a user base the size of the United States population, sat down for a little chat with Techcrunch brainchild Michael Arrington to discuss his thoughts on what's public information and how much privacy any of us, especially those on Facebook, should expect in this day and age.

The short answer: Not much. Zuckerberg doesn't see privacy in today's world of constant updates as a "social norm" anymore. Here's a quick synopsis of Zuckerberg's take:

When I got started in my dorm room at Harvard, the question a lot of people asked was 'why would I want to put any information on the Internet at all? Why would I want to have a website?'

And then in the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way and all these different services that have people sharing all this information. People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time.

We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are.

A lot of companies would be trapped by the conventions and their legacies of what they've built, doing a privacy change - doing a privacy change for 350 million users is not the kind of thing that a lot of companies would do. But we viewed that as a really important thing, to always keep a beginner's mind and what would we do if we were starting the company now and we decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it.

Facebook and its privacy policies and murky content ownership decisions have bubbled up increasingly in the public consciousness of late. At a site where people feel free to post anything and everything about their lives - when did we become such exhibitionists? - to hear the driving force behind it eschew the strident need for privacy protection is, umm, an interesting public admission that bears cautionary attention.

But do you even care about privacy anymore? Or are you fine with status updating and geo-lacting and photo posting your way toward a completely open, available lifestyle?

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/28581

1 Comment

Hmm ok, does anyone remember back in 2009 when facebook changed their privacy settings so that the default choice was 'everyone'? I believe facebook only did that with the intent to increase net number of pages visible in search engines and to all their users. I think they did this simply out of greed, because they knew that if more people saw more pages, they would make more money off of the advertisments. And they made this choice without caring for their users current privacy settings. But hey, what can you expect. Facebook is a corporation, and corporations make money. do you guys agree?

Leave a comment

Powered by the


Recent Comments

  • international tv online: Hmm ok, does anyone remember back in 2009 when facebook read more

March 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

    About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by Craig Newman published on January 12, 2010 9:04 AM.

    Hanson covers Radiohead's 'Optimistic' - but who does it better? was the previous entry in this blog.

    Roxxxy the sex robot is ready to just talk if you need a friend is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.