Panahi is home!
Categories:
epigraphs
"I don't think you go to a play to forget, or to a movie to be distracted. I think life generally is a distraction and that going to a movie is a way to get back, not go away." -- Tom Noonan
"Cinema is a matter of what's in the frame and what's out." -- Martin Scorsese
“An idea does not exist apart from the words that express it. Style is not an envelope enclosing a message; the envelope is the message.” -- Dwight Macdonald
"There's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view that I hold dear." -- Daniel Dennett
recent comments
- Jim Emerson commented on The heroes we deserve: Thanks. It's kind of hard
- Ernest Rister commented on The Avengers & the Amazing "Critic-Proof" Movie: A few of my friends have
- Luke commented on The heroes we deserve: First time poster. I can
- Bob K commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: I recognized Wes Anderson
- Jim Emerson commented on The heroes we deserve: I wasn't going to say any
- GRT commented on The heroes we deserve: Careful there, mate. Bein
- Andrew commented on The heroes we deserve: Forgot about my asterisk!
- John Panagopoulos, Malden, MA commented on The Avengers & the Amazing "Critic-Proof" Movie: Similarly in "Avengers",
- Mr. B commented on Rescued by M. Night! Four pieces of Unbreakable...: I showed Unbreakable to m
- Jim Emerson commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: I had blocked out that cr
- Jim Emerson commented on The heroes we deserve: Thank you for your diagno
- Chris Kimsey commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: Do you see much Teal and
- Jason Haggstrom (haggie) commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: Re: Paris Hilton. Actuall
- sylvain commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: Ah! My sons are actually
- Nic Hautamaki commented on These guys make Guy Ritchie's career all the more insignificant: Damn as an old-school MMA
- GRT commented on The heroes we deserve: Right, at least we got th
- Alex V. commented on These guys make Guy Ritchie's career all the more insignificant: Zack Snyder does this eve
- Jim Emerson commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: I know a Brazilian film c
- Jim Emerson commented on The heroes we deserve: Oh, I'm definitely invest
- Satish Naidu commented on Cannes & Cannes-not: On being a movie geek: And thus I have decided.
selected articles
- Plumbing in the Cinema
- Buster Keaton
- TwinPeaks
- Barry Lyndon
- 'Birth' of a Buñuelian Notion
- Donnie Darko
- Fight Club
- War of the Worlds
- Mind Games & Head Trips
- Politics & Movies
- Miller's Crossing
- Sansho the Bailiff
- The Coen Bros.
- Million Dollar Baby
- The Big Lie
- When Bad Movies Happen to Good People
- Munich
- Jeeem's Pantheon
- 120Favorite Movies
categories
- A Serious Man (5)
- Acting (34)
- Books (15)
- CGI (4)
- Censorship (23)
- Cinematography (11)
- Comedy (174)
- Contrarian Week (12)
- Contrarianism Blog-a-Thon (5)
- Critical Thinking (101)
- Critics & criticism (451)
- DVD (35)
- Directors & direction (150)
- Dogs (12)
- Editing (13)
- Exhibition (9)
- Extras (1)
- Festivals & events (61)
- Film noir (3)
- Funny Games experiment (6)
- Horror (57)
- In the Cut (3)
- Inglourious Basterds (10)
- Journalism (86)
- Language (32)
- Mad Men (6)
- Movies (195)
- Music (46)
- No Country for Old Men (19)
- Obits & tributes (44)
- Opening Shots Index (1)
- Opening Shots Project (87)
- Opening Shots Project, Part 2 (5)
- Oscars (37)
- Politics (123)
- Religion (45)
- Sex (26)
- Sound (3)
- TIFF 2006 (24)
- TIFF 2007 (21)
- TIFF 2008 (12)
- TV (88)
- Technology (80)
- The Biz (96)
- The Dark Knight (19)
- The Descent (4)
- The Social Network (8)
- Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
- Trapped in the Closet (6)
- VIFF 2009 (7)
- VIFF 2011 (4)
- Video essay (21)
- Writing (8)

search
tweet / facebook
recent entries
- Emotional fascism -- er, criticism
- Climb on up into the Movie Tree House!
- Trash Humpers not banned, hump trash
- National Society: The last best critics awards for 2010
- Scanners' Exploding Head Awards 2010
- Locating the difference between a good movie and a not-so-good one
- Big buttocks & curry killers: Worst of Bollywood 2010
- Making contact: Spielberg's Close Encounters and E.T.
- And the poll-winners are...
- Why Soderbergh is retiring soon
- The Ultimate Internet Commenting Guidelines
- Panahi gets six years; banned from film for 20
- Moments Out of Time 2010
- The year's beasts: MSN critics' top 10 for 2010
- LA & NY crix love The Social Network and Carlos
- Darren Aronofsky agrees with me
- My capsule review of Client 9
- The naked truth about Airport Security Theater
- Nothing is real(ism), and nothing to get hung about
- The Return of the Autobiographical Dictionary of Film
google connect
May 2012
critics
- Roger Ebert
- David Ansen
- Michael Atkinson
- David Bordwell
- Ty Burr
- Richard Corliss
- Manohla Dargis
- David Denby
- DVD Savant
- David Edelstein
- David Ehrenstein
- Scott Foundas
- Chris Fujiwara
- John Hartl
- J. Hoberman
- Richard T. Jameson
- Dave Kehr
- Glenn Kenny
- Leonard Maltin
- Kim Morgan
- Wesley Morris
- Kathleen Murphy
- Andrew O'Hehir
- John Patterson
- Gerald Peary
- John Powers
- Peter Rainer
- Jonathan Rosenbaum
- A.O. Scott
- Henry Sheehan
- Kristin Thompson
- Michael Wilmington
- Matt Zoller Seitz
blogs, journals & zines
- AltScreen
- Antagony & Ecstasy
- Art of the Title
- Aspect Ratio
- Balboa Theater Newsletter (Gary Meyer)
- Big Media Vandalism
- Breaking the line
- Cahiers du Cinema (English)
- Cerebral Mastication
- Cinebeats
- Cinema Scope
- Cinemasparagus
- Cinema Styles
- Cinema Treasures
- The Cinematic Art
- CinePassion
- coffee, coffee ... and more coffee
- The Cooler
- Discours du Cinéma
- Edward Copeland
- Elusive Lucidity
- The Evening Class
- Filmbrain
- a_film_by
- Film International
- TheFilmsaurus Film Studies For Free
- Filmsound Daily
- The Fine Cut
- Flickhead
- The Greatest Films
- Girish
- Greenbriar Picture Shows
- GreenCine Daily
- Hell on Frisco Bay
- The House Next Door
- If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger...
- IFC Blog
- images: a journal of film and popular culture
- j.j. murphy on independent cinema
- Kubrick Multimedia Archive
- Living in Cinema
- Aspect Ratio
- LOLA
- Masters of Cinema
- My Five Year Plan
- The Niles Files
- Not Coming to a Theater Near You
- Offscreen
- Parallax View
- Phil-zine!
- Press Play
- Reverse Shot
- Rouge
- Screenville
- Senses of Cinema
- Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule
- The Seventh Art
- The Sheila Variations
- Shoot First, Mumble Later
- Sight & Sound
- Silly Hats Only
- sixmartinis and the seventh art
- Spectacular Attractions
- Strictly Film School
- Offscreen
- Tales of OdieNary Madness
- They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
- Vinyl Is Heavy
- Undercurrent (FIPRESCI)
- when canses were classeled...
6 Comments
I get that his family is there, his life is there, and leaving would mean stopping the fight against an unjust, stolen government, but I can't see why he would stay in Iran. If you're going to be imprisoned for alleged thoughts, I don't see why you subject yourself to that. Panahi is far more fortunate than other people in his situation, and he has ties around the world that could assist him in leaving Iran. Why not leave?
This is good news, Jim. Heard yesterday. I hope he's able to flee the country eventually and move somewhere he can work and live in relative freedom. Do you think all the Cannes publicity--Kiarostami's letter and Binoche's speech--had anything to do with it? Or was it more about his hunger strike and the threat he'd become another martyr for the reformers? The hard-line regime is so inscrutable it's probably impossible to know. How about a little love his films? I've seen the Kiarostami-scripted CRIMSON GOLD--which features a great depiction of the Tehran vice police raiding a party where--gasp--boys and girls are congregating together. And I love OFFSIDE, a film about women's rights...(I hear some of you out there start to yawn)...to love soccer as much as men do. And it's mostly a comedy. About going to the big game and not quite getting there. The politics in his films always come through the characters and the story, are always organic, never superimposed just to make a point. Which makes for much better films for us, the international audience, but maybe also more threatening ones for the military regime at home?
I have to say he looks better after the hunger strike. Other than that, everything he's been through is appalling of course.
This is truly wonderful! :D I think this is incredible news.
Nick, I would imagine that he's staying in Iran because, other than his family being there, it is his country, and to leave it would probably be devastating.
Jim, this may appear pedantic, but Iran is actually not a dictatorship, and rather is a theocracy. That does not change its brutal nature, and in no way am I defending it, but Iran bases its legitimacy on a theological basis; dictatorships base their legitimacy purely on power.
Good point. I might better have used the term authoritarian or totalitarian. My aim was to emphasize that Ahmadinejad's regime -- like the USSR, or Mao's China, or Franco's Spain, or Hitler's Germany, or Ceausescu's Romania -- is an autocratic government run by a powerful figurehead and a few associates (even if they're clerics). Ahmadinejad, like many despots, uses religion as a prop, but Panahi's supposed "sins" were not religious in nature but political ones. He was accused of conspiring to make a film "critical of the regime." It's really about stifling dissent and maintaining political control.
Welcome back, Mr. Panahi. Now let's wait for that movie to surface.
And I've got a LOT of catching up to do at Scanners...
Leave a comment