scanners: blog   |   about jim   |   e-mail jim   |   rogerebert.com   |   suntimes.com

« TIFF 2007: Abortion in demand | Main

TIFF 2007: Cronenberg's knockout punch

ep1.jpg
View image Armin Mueller-Stahl at the head of the table, head of the family

You are going to hear a lot about this, so I may as well begin with it: There's a fight scene in David Cronenberg's Russian mob thriller "Eastern Promises" that is sure to go down as a raw, brutal and pulse-pounding landmark in the history of fight scenes. It takes place in one room, with no props except for a couple knives. People in the audience at the Toronto screening I attended were flinching and gasping as if they were being punched in the face. Which, of course, is the idea. If a fight scene doesn't make you feel like you're part of it, so that it quickens your heartbeat and your breathing, then it's a failure. And Cronenberg's makes you realize how many movie fights are flops -- and how really hard it is to kill or immobilize a human being with your arms, legs, feet and hands.

Literally and figuratively, "Eastern Promises" has balls.

And in this sense, it reminds me of both the excruciatingly protracted struggle between Paul Newman and the Russian agent in "Torn Curtain," and the knock-down, drag-out fist-fest between Keith David and Rowdy Roddy Piper in John Carpenter's "They Live!

eps.jpg
View image Lamppost-spined Viggo Mortensen and Naomi Watts.

Directed in a bold, graphic style similar to that of his previous film, "A History of Violence," "Eastern Promises" is shockingly gorgeous, for all the ugliness it portrays. The film is set in London, and the colors are dark and heavy: gray skies, slick black streets, brandy, absinthe, venous blood. A hospital midwife (Naomi Watts) finds a patient's diary that gets her involved with Russian gangsters -- in particular, a shrewd and ambitious chauffeur played by "History of Violence" star Viggo Mortensen, looking sharper and more angular and cooly abstract than ever. (Watch the way he props himself against a lamppost so that they become extensions of each other. How does he do that?)

It begins like a Cronenbergian horror movie, and becomes... a Cronenberg gangster movie -- an elemental struggle between good and evil, life and death, east and west, blood and money, trust and betrayal, commerce and morality, mind and body. Remember, that's "elemental," not "simplistic." There are... complications.

More when the movie opens.

NOTE: Watts' proud, abrasive, vodka-swilling Russian uncle is played by the great Polish director, Jerzy Skolimowski ("Deep End," "The Shout," "Moonlighting").

Comments

How much do I hate myself for missing this? So much.

Did you catch In The Valley of Elah today? I'd love to hear your thoughts.

the knock-down, drag-out fist-fest between Keith David and Rowdy Roddy Piper in John Carpenter's "They Live!"

That's the movie South Park parodied, right?

"They Live" is indeed the film parodied in South Park. It is one hell of a movie.

Here's a point-by-point retrospective of David Cronenberg in advance of Eastern Promises - I forgot how many great films he's made

http://buzzfeed.com/buzz/Eastern_Promises

I can't help feeling a bit let down. No matter how good the film is, the fact remains that David Cronenberg is known for making some of the most stunningly original surreal dramas ever. Who could forget they insects and mugwumps of Naked Lunch? Or the literalizing of McLuhan's theories about technology affecting our evolution in Videodrome? Or the irreversible transformation from man into human fly in The Fly? Films that take place in a feasible reality are all right, but I crave that element of bold experimentalism! Really, I think if you put a man coming to terms with his violent past on one hand and a man being transformed by his television on the other, one of the two seems to have a greater inherent fascination; just go with your first instinct on this one. Which one is more unlike the general scope of what's out there? Go ahead and argue the point, but I'm sticking with the surreal science fiction piece. And Cronenberg was a master at it! If he stops making films in this vein, who will fill the void? I don't think there are many people who can. By the same token, if he abandons this new vein of stories taking place in a feasible reality, who will fill that void? I think that's a much easier void to fill.

Say what you like about it. I want my experimental cinema.

Post a comment