scanners: blog   |   about jim   |   e-mail jim   |   rogerebert.com   |   suntimes.com

« You don't even want to know what a scrunt is... | Main | Film history from A to Z... »

Opening Shots: 'Femme Fatale'

From Dennis Cozzalio, Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule:

Brian De Palma’s exceedingly stimulating and sensational consideration of femme fatale iconography and the possibility of redemption within it begins with one of the director’s customarily brilliant, multilayered opening shots.

Under the black of the producers credits, familiar voices are heard. It’s Fred MacMurray. Fade up on a shot of an extreme close-up of a TV. It’s MacMurray, 525 broadcast lines blown up to big-screen size, in "Double Indemnity". But a close examination of the image reveals a splash of color -- something else is visible here, contrasting with the black-and-white images of Billy Wilder’s film. It’s a reflected image of a half-naked woman stretched out perpendicular across the TV screen. She is watching "Double Indemnity", and we see her watching the movie in her reflection off the glass TV screen. "Double Indemnity" continues to play out, crosscutting between MacMurray and the original femme fatale, Barbara Stanwyck (as Phyllis Dietrichson).

The image of the young woman becomes clear, yet remains slightly ghostly, as the image in Wilder’s film darkens. MacMurray moves to close a window, when a shot rings out. Stanwyck has betrayed him with a bullet, and the title credit "Femme Fatale" pops on screen at the same time, as the ethereal image of the woman, reclining on her side, dispassionately watching the movie, lingers. (The title credit “A Film by Brian De Palma� was earlier synchronized with Stanwyck’s first appearance on the TV.) Now De Palma’s camera begins to pull back. We see the cabinet of the TV, and we can now also observe that there are French subtitles superimposed on Wilder’s film. The image of the woman reflected in the TV seems even clearer now, as we continue to pull back, seeing her much more clearly in the flesh, gray tendrils rising from the cigarette she’s smoking while watching the TV. At this point there is double layering of the woman’s image, the reflection and the person being reflected, over the image of Stanwyck, who has taken a dominant position over her wounded lover as she confesses her machinations against him.

The camera pulls all the way back to reveal that the woman watching is nude, her ass covered by a sheet, her bare back and legs exposed to us. Like the samurai in "Yojimbo", we’ve not had a clear look at her face, except for what we could discern in the reflection on the TV screen, and we’ll be denied one for the length of the shot. Suddenly a door opens (off screen), outside light briefly streams in and the door closes, as we hear a man’s voice say, “What the fuck are you doing?� A black man in a tuxedo enters the frame from the left and turns off the TV. The woman has not moved, not acknowledged his presence, not said a word. The camera begins moving in on him as he begins to quiz her. “Do you know what time it is?� She gets up off the bed, revealing that she is at least wearing black panties, but totally unselfconscious in this man’s presence in the fact that she is otherwise naked. She stands and moves across him to the left, still smoking. She begins to dress and he continues in what seems at first to be a parody of the hardboiled language we’ve just heard and seen on the TV:

“Listen up. At 2200 Wetsuit’s down the hole when the snake hits the carpet. Security lifts the key. I terminate the torpedoes.�

The woman has now put on her top and moved completely out of frame to the left.

“Charm the snake into the stall. Bait and switch. At 2220 Wetsuit turns out the lights. Glasses on. I bag the snake.�

The camera is now pulling back as he moves left to where she is.

“Key in the bag. Bag to the boat. No radio unless absolutely necessary.�

The man has now seated himself next to the woman backward on a chair, as she continues to prepare herself at a vanity. She has still offered no response to what he is saying, or even really acknowledged his presence, or whether she is even hearing what he is saying or not. She tamps down her slick, short, dyed blonde hair with both hands, still holding a cigarette in the left.

“Code red, five minutes to blackout. Drop everything. Walk away. If the cops catch you, tell them the truth. You know no one. Got it?�

By now the man has begun staring at her intensely, looking for some hint that she is processing what he is saying to her.

“Got it?�

She leans into the frame, looks directly at him, coolly blows smoke in his direction, and nods.

“You have your passport?�

She flicks it into frame very casually. He peruses the document and continues:

“The plane leaves tomorrow at 0700.�

She flippantly offers a mock salute, as if to say, “Yes, sir, sir!� He smiles.

“And remember, no names and no guns.�

Suddenly there is the sound of a crowd chattering and milling about outside. The man acknowledges it with a cursory glance, but before we have had the chance to really process it ourselves, he leans forward slightly and slaps the woman hard across the face. She leans back, absorbs the blow and then slowly leans forward into a straight-up sitting position, her face still turned away from us and toward him, never taking her eye off of him. He continues:

“Are you high?�

She shakes her head slowly.

“Then stop dreaming, bitch. This isn’t a game tonight. People can die. Now get moving.�

He places the passport in his jacket pocket, rises up off the chair and moves away from her, toward the drawn curtain at the center of the room (and the frame). We become aware again of the sound of that mysterious crowd outside. He turns to her again, bends down out of frame and retrieves a headset, holds it up to her and says,

“You forget something?�

The woman emerges from the left, walks up to the man, never taking her eyes off his face, and grabs the headset from him. The producer’s credits are superimposed on the man as he rubs his hands together and considers this unflappable, impossibly cool woman. He adjusts his tie and his lapels, and light once again floods the room as the woman opens the door off screen. He turns sharply toward the window, reaches up and throws open the shade.

Cut to a long shot of the red carpet on closing night of the Cannes Film Festival. The credit is superimposed over the scene of the festivities: Directed by Brian De Palma.

JE: You picked a doozy here, Dennis! And there's so much communicated in this shot beyond the dialogue and the details of the caper, too. First, there's "Double Indemnity" -- the climactic scene of "Double Indemnity," after MacMurray's plans have gone awry and he's wised up to what a sucker he's been -- with French subtitles. Well, the movie is called "Femme Fatale," a French phrase, and now we assume we're probably in France. Visually, with that reflection/superimposition, De Palma transfers the title from Stanwyck to his "femme fatale" -- and, in movie terms, updates her in the process: She's still a blonde, but she's got a modern androgynous haircut... and she's nude, which is not something you would have seen in a 1944 Paramount Picture. (Also, something tells me this woman is not watching "Double Indemnity" for the first time; if anything, she's refreshing her study of it for her role in the movie we're about to see.)

I love the way De Palma compartmentalizes screen space here, too, using frames within frames. (Remember, this is a guy who loves split screen: "Sisters," "Carrie"...) First there's the TV screen (which is also a mirror), then the window that is obviously behind the drapes, and which will be used for the final reveal you describe. As you say, the journey is from a film ("DI" on TV) ... to a film festival (outside the window). De Palma keeps composing and re-composing -- and I think my favorite little moment is when she thrusts her head into the left edge of the frame (this profile is the closest we get to seeing her non-reflected face) to defiantly confront the man, coordinator of the unfolding plot, who is there to keep her in line. At the mirrored vanity, we have more frames-within-frames, but De Palma keeps us craning our necks to see more (kind of like Polanski's famous doorway shot of Ruth Gordon on the bedroom phone in "Rosemary's Baby"). He never actually shows us a clear reflection of the woman in those mirrors, frustrating our expectations. At the end of the shot we don't see her leave, but the light from an opened door (to the bathroom? hallway?) spills into the room. The movie's visual strategy has been beautifully set up now: We will be seeing pictures within pictures, one part of the whole but never the Big Picture... until the end of the picture.

Comments

Aaahhh! Post an image of the carpet reveal! Now I have to go out and rent the movie. It sounds, and looks, fantastic.

JE: I refrained on purpose -- cause that's not in the opening shot!

Hey Jim,

After reading your list of 101, then 102 movies required for film literacy, I watched the remaining dozen movies that I had not seen. (Actually, I watched only bits and pieces of "Pink Flamingoes." I couldn't stand that movie.)

Do you have a second list of the next 50 to 100 movies? Or a list of the movies since 1/1/2000?

I already have watched 60% of Roger Ebert's Great Movies, and 36% of the "1001 Movies You Must Watch Before You Die."

I'd like to know your next 50 or 100 movies.

Gary

PS I loved the beginning of "Femme Fatale." However, I did not begin to catch all of the points that you did! Great work.

Jim, I'd like to second Gary's enthusiasm for the analysis you did on that Femme Fatale opening shot. As I reread the piece, I realized that I did damn little of it myself but instead just went the descriptive route. Your comments were the real source of the illumination on this shot, and I thank you for it!

Many thanks, guys. My pleasure! I've got enough great stuff people have sent in to keep me busy for months. I wish more than ever that Roger would come back soon so I can have more time to devote to these Opening Shots...

Another aspect of this movie that is revealed in the opening shot is that it is a long strip tease. De Palma gives us several scenes in which we expect (hope) to see Rebecca Romijn nude, but it is from behind (as in the opening shot) or obscured or her undressing is interrupted. If memory serves, it is not until she plunges into the water near the end that she is fully revealed, and even then, she's underwater. De Palma loves to toy with his audiences and does so here using Romijn's sexuality, treating us much as she treats Antonio Banderas in the film.

This is such a cinephile (and humble) move for De Palma to open his own movie with somebody else's movie. I didn't see Femme Fatale yet, so many thanks for this precise and insightful description!

So many symbols at work in the TV bit alone, if we consider the order of screen apparition, paying particular attention to their nature and their significance.
The update of the femme fatale model, as Jim points out, is also from B&W to color, an aesthetic leap, not only in fashion. At the same time a nostalgic look back on the past, and a confrontation of two cinema ages, through the most possible violent comparison : superimposition. Giving the edge to the glossy color image of course. The old TV texture undermines even more the B&W image. It's like a comparative test : "Do you prefer color of B&W?" The nudity evoked by Denis further biases this shock of eras, and the male figure switching off TV like a parental punishment terminates this uneven rivalery. The present wins, but it's more like an imposed wake up call to suppress our complacent nostalgia. (What is De Palma saying by that?)

Then there is the multilayered apparition of the protagonist by progressive stages.

First we see the object of veneration, full screen. And the anachronistic reflection enters the frame to deny the original diegesis (Double Indemnity), literally upstaging Stanwyck.

Now the image of the voyeur is revealed to the audience made self-conscious. Like if a spotlight was directed on the spectator in the dark theatre, showing up our anonymous presence on the silver screen like on a mirroring window. The TV screen stands for the peeping window of voyeurism.

So that's a dialogue with the audience, a welknown feeling shared by a cinephile. The unidentified protagonist is like us, an audience within this fiction. Calling for a deeper identification with her.

Moving on to a deeper layer, we assume the protagonist's point of view. The girl watches a mythical icon and her reflection merges into her. The mirror image materializes this unconscious process of identification (transfer), like a ghost double of herself projected outside her body to rub off a little against the screen, and maybe become a movie star too. Which actually happens with the introduction of the real protagonist, pushing back Barbara Stanwyck to backdrop layer.

There is probably a more complex message about screen feminity nested there by De Palma. I don't know the narrative connection between Double Indemnity and Femme Fatal, so I can't figure the thematic purpose.

The reality check of the TV set and the subtitles continue to remove the viewer from the screen world. A trick meant to accentuate the reality of this hereby fiction (Femme Fatale), by contrast to another fiction film (Double Indemnity) turned into a mere video playing on TV and switched off abruptly. The nudity uncovered as the shot widens makes us more and more interested in the color diegesis.

Perverse manipulation to install the proverbial suspension of disbelief. Now we are ready to forget we are watching a movie, because the movie was on that TV, now what's happening is reality and we're in it!

Post a comment

 
 

RSS/XML Feeds


XML
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

BittyBrowser
Add to My AOL
Convert RSS to PDF
Subscribe in Rojo
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader
MultiRSS
R|Mail
Rss fwd
Simpify!
Add to Technorati Favorites!
Add to netvibes
Add this site to your Protopage

Subscribe in NewsAlloy
Subscribe in myEarthlink


 
 
 

Terms of use | Privacy policy
Copyright 2006, Digital Chicago Inc.