Rezko trial: Putting it in perspective

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Star witness Stuart Levine's allegations that Ed Vrdolyak took bribes is the first time ...

Levine has accused Vrdolyak of accepting a payment.
Levine's allegations, which Vrdolyak's lawyer call untrue, put Vrdolyak in the middle of a business-as-usual, political corruption scheme. That's a culture Vrdolyak has long denied being part of.
But Vrdolyak was called "Fast Eddie" in part, because of his ability to slip from the grasp of the feds. But in 2006 they charged him after Levine started talking to them.
Vrdolyak is charged in connection with the sale of a pricey piece of downtown real estate. Levine says Vrdolyak schemed to illegally make money off the deal but the transaction didn't go through. He's set to go to trial in September and Levine is supposed to be a witness.

Recently at a Vrdolyak court hearing, his attorneys made a veiled reference to other allegations that prosecutors planned to introduce at his upcoming trial. Is this stuff what they were referring to?
Vrdolyak lawyer Michael Monico charged Tuesday night that today is the first he's ever heard of these allegations.
And the alleged bribes took place so long ago, the statute of limitations probably expired, he acknowledged.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Rezko trial: Putting it in perspective.

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Great job - I think about it and write something more next time - bye.

Leave a comment

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Natasha Korecki

Natasha Korecki is the Federal Courts Reporter for the Chicago Sun-Times, covering federal news, corruption investigations and trials.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Natasha Korecki published on March 18, 2008 10:42 PM.

A Vrdolyak primer was the previous entry in this blog.

Rezko trial: Schools contract is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.