Your local news source ::
      Select a community or newspaper »


tv listings blogs video centerstage entertainment yellow pages jobs media kit advertising info restaurant reviews eating in roger ebert sudoku crossword lottery obits commentary Letters to the editor horoscopes

May 13, 2008

More Joe Duffy one-liners

Tony Rezko's defense attorney, Joseph Duffy, is continuing his closing argument this morning. He keeps hammering away at star prosecution witness Stuart P. Levine with colorful statements about Levine's admitted drug use and criminal past:

Continue reading "More Joe Duffy one-liners" »

Rezko trial: Tony on tape

U.S. Prosecutor Reid Schar highlighted more than a dozen audio recordings where Tony Rezko is referenced or in a rare instance, actually talking himself.

Here's what a government wire tap caught Stuart Levine and others saying on the phone. They did not know they were being recorded.

•On 4/17/04 Levine says Rezko told him:
“It’s like, find us whatever you can...just do it, make it happen Stuart.”
•On 4/17/04 Levine says Rezko told him:
“What do you need to proceed?”
Levine says he answered: “Your permission.”
•On 4/18/04 Levine tells construction company owner Jacob Kiferbaum
“(Rezko) wants us to take whatever we can.”
•On 4/21/04 Levine tells Kiferbaum
“He’s got the power boy.”
•On 4/21/04 Levine tells his friend Bob Weinstein:
“(Rezko) wants to make as much money as he can, while he can.”
•On 5/18/04 Rezko tells Levine:
“Tom will carry the ball and nobody will know.”

May 12, 2008

Levine's $1.3 million in cash and 806 calls

Tony Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy repeatedly called prosecution witness Stuart Levine a liar, saying he caught Levine in lies right on the stand.
"He lies so much, I don't think he knows when he's lying," Duffy said. "It's that bad."
Levine admitted to 30 years of drug use, including some heavy-duty drugs, such as Crystal Meth, Special K and cocaine.

Continue reading "Levine's $1.3 million in cash and 806 calls" »

Rezko trial: Enough to wake a sleeping juror

There's good news and bad news for Tony Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy.

Good news: He struck a chord with at least one juror. The male who couldn't keep his eyes open all morning and afternoon was open-eyed and alert when Duffy started his closing remarks at about 3:30 p.m. He even smiled wide a couple of times at Duffy's jokes and seemed to pay close attention to exhibits Duffy put up on the screen.

Bad news: The juror next to him nodded off.

Rezko trial: Another Obama mention

Defense lawyer Joseph Duffy is pulling out all the stops in trying to diffuse the government’s case against Tony Rezko.

- Duffy told jurors that Rezko probably did more fund-raising for Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), President Bush and St. Jude’s children’s hospital in 2003 than he did for Gov. Blagojevich. That includes “a Barack Obama fund-raiser or two.” This isn’t the first time Duffy trotted out Obama’s name during the trial. He did the same thing during opening statements.

- Duffy took aim at former Illinois Finance Authority Executive Director Ali Ata, saying Ata over-hyped his relationship with Rezko and under-hyped it with the Blagojevich and Mell families. Ata didn’t need Rezko to get a state job, Duffy said, because he was so close to the governor and Patti Blagojevich’s father, Ald. Dick Mell (33rd). “[Ata] could have gone and rang the doorbell at the governor’s house and probably gotten a hug from Patti,” Duffy said.

-Duffy on Blagojevich campaign contributions made by people who were appointed to posts on state boards and commissions: “They [prosecutors] want you to believe that people gave campaign contributions to get on boards that didn’t pay any money.”

-Duffy rebutting phone charts the government presented as evidence: “Mr. Rezko’s so-called political influence has been grossly, grossly overstated. How many phone calls did we have between Mr. Rezko and the governor? Remember that chart? It doesn’t exist.”

-- By Chris Fusco

Duffy: Live or Memorex, it doesn't matter

Tony Rezko's defense lawyer, Joseph Duffy, began his closing argument around 3:30 p.m. An animated, dramatic Duffy says he's trying to appeal to jurors' "common sense" and is pinning the crimes Rezko is accused of committing on the prosecution's star witness: Stuart P. Levine.

Continue reading "Duffy: Live or Memorex, it doesn't matter" »

Reid Schar's list

Assistant U.S. Attorney Reid Schar is wrapping up his closing argument against Tony Rezko. "Did the defendant knowingly join this fraud scheme?" Schar asked jurors. "He both joined it and participated in it."

Continue reading "Reid Schar's list" »

Sleeping juror

The groggy male juror in the back row who has consistently been caught sleeping throughout the trial, has perhaps broken his own record today for nodding off.

This isn't a scientific study, but today, while I've watched him, his eyes have been closed as often as they've been open.

Will he survive the final jury cut? Should he?


For the prosecution: Reid Schar

Here's a little background on the prosecutor who is giving today's closing in the Tony Rezko trial.

(from an earlier posting in the trial).
Reid Schar, 35, is deputy chief of public corruption in the U.S. Attorney’s office. Schar joined Hamilton in the Muhammad Salah Hamas fund-raising trial. Other prosecutions include a Chinatown extortion, a major gang case from Chicago Heights and Oak Forest corruption. Schar is a Stanford Undergraduate and Northwestern Law School graduate. He clerked for U.S. District Judge Elaine Bucklo. He worked at Sidley & Austin at the same time as Niewoehner. Schar has also served as an adjunct faculty member at Northwestern Law since 2002.

To close or not to close?

The trial broke for lunch around noon, and the prosecution's closing argument will resume at 1:30 p.m. Assistant U.S. Attorney Reid Schar expects the rest of his closing argument will last no more than 90 minutes once things resume.

Continue reading "To close or not to close?" »

Downplaying Levine

It took a half hour or so before Assistant U.S. Attorney Reid J. Schar began referencing star prosecution witness Stuart Levine in his closing argument.

Continue reading "Downplaying Levine" »

Government kicks off closing arguments in Rezko trial

The government’s closing argument in Tony Rezko’s corruption trial kicked off at 9:04 a.m. and is expected to take between three and four hours. Rezko’s defense attorney, Joseph Duffy, will decide after that whether he wants to begin his closing argument today or wait until tomorrow.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Reid J. Schar has begun recounting the government’s case. Key words he keeps repeating at the beginning are “time and time again.”

“Time and time again the evidence demonstrates the defendant was not about good government,” Schar says. “His corrupt actions benefited himself and his friends over the interests of the people.”

Rezko trial: Tension building

The line this morning to get into Tony Rezko's trial is halfway down the hallway.

Rezko entered the building early today, and waits inside a witness and attorney room off the hallway on the 12th floor. Today, he wears a navy blue suit and a striped tie.

In line is apparently family members (possibly a brother and parents?) of Prosecutor Reid Schar, who will be delivering this morning's summation. As Schar walks toward the courtroom, he pauses and gives them a nod to get out of line. They follow him in before the rest of the crowd.

Continue reading "Rezko trial: Tension building" »

Rezko trial: A Rezko review

Why is Tony Rezko on trial? What were some of the key moments over two months of testimony?
How does this all culminate in today's closing arguments?

Read today's story "Rezko Recap," for a reminder of some of the major events that played out in court.

May 08, 2008

Fat tax break for felon

Stuart Levine, the star witness in the Tony Rezko trial, won hundreds of thousands
of dollars in tax breaks on his Highland Park Home.

Read today's "Watchdogs" By Chris Fusco: Tax break for Levine

May 07, 2008

Rezko trial: Jail time in question for those who cooperated


While meeting with lawyers in a jury instruction conference this afternoon, Judge Amy St. Eve
said it wasn't a certainty that witnesses who pleaded guilty will receive shorter prison time.
"There's no guarantee any of them will get reduced sentences," St. Eve said.

Continue reading "Rezko trial: Jail time in question for those who cooperated" »

May 06, 2008

Rezko trial: Obama escapes unscathed

rezobama

The Tony Rezko trial had potential to tarnish the name of Presidential hopeful Barack Obama.

But Obama turned out to be merely a blip in the trial, despite his longtime ties to Rezko.

Sun-Times columnist Mark Brown explores the issue in his column today.

Read: 'Rezko trial hasn't harmed Obama -- yet'

Rezko trial: Defense calls prosecution's case weak

No Tony Rezko activity today. Lawyers on both sides are preparing for their closing arguments and for Wednesday's hearing to discuss jury instructions.

Here's today's story: Defense calls no witnesses

May 05, 2008

Defense: Prosecution didn't prove case

When asked after court today why no witnesses were brought to the stand to testify in Rezko's defense, Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy said it had to do with a deficient government case.

"We do not believe the government has met their burden in proving its charges against Mr. Rezko," Duffy said. "Plain and simple."

Closing arguments are scheduled for 9 a.m. May 12 -- next Monday.

For the prosecution: It appears Prosecutor Reid Schar will give the summary and Chris Niewoehner will give the rebuttal.

For the defense: Joseph Duffy will give the defense closing argument. Duffy and Niehwoehner will try to wrap it up Tuesday because the jury has a previously scheduled day off Wednesday, May 14.

The jury will likely return Thursday of next week to begin their deliberations.