Chicago Sun-Times
Staff reports on all things politics - from City Hall to Springfield to Washington, D.C.

Senate concealed-carry push never sees the floor, NRA resistance leaves it short of votes

| 7 Comments | No TrackBacks

CONCEALED_CARRY_39167665.JPGState Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), pictured here taking questions from reporters Friday at the Capitol, was unable to strike an agreement on his concealed-carry bill to move it through the Illinois Senate. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)

SPRINGFIELD-A Senate effort to impose restrictive concealed-carry limits on Illinois gun owners failed to surface for a vote Friday as expected even after the legislation was changed to ease opposition from the National Rifle Association.

"One of the realities that I was keenly aware of when I entered this effort was that there are some extremists," said Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), sponsor of the gun-control measure. "There are some extremists with some very loyal followings, and they use intimidation as part of their advocacy efforts. And sometimes that intimidation is quite effective."

Both Raoul and Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) had hinted at a full floor vote after the bill cleared a Senate panel on a 10-4 vote Thursday, but it became clear a consensus had not been reached by Friday.

The bill was at least partly short of votes due to NRA resistance over the legislation requiring Chicago police Supt. Garry McCarthy to vet all permit-seekers in Chicago and allowing local sheriffs to object to any permit application.

Raoul partly gave in to the NRA Friday by removing a part of his bill that would have required applicants to demonstrate "good moral character," a measure criticized for being too vague. But it wasn't enough to get the required 30 votes for passage, and Raoul didn't express a desire to concede much more.

"These are people who, you know, use aggressive advocacy efforts - legal advocacy efforts but aggressive advocacy efforts," Raoul said, alluding to the NRA. "People who rate you by grades as if you were in school."

Raoul isn't likely to concede the part of his bill that allows 'home-rule' communities, like Chicago and more than 200 other local municipalities in Illinois, to set even tighter restrictions on where guns would be allowed.

"And if that means going to the end where there's a stalemate and it'll be up to local municipalities to enact ordinances...they'll see a far worse patchwork that they would have to try to navigate than the compromise that was proposed in my bill," he said.

The possibility of a stalemate appears more likely now as two concealed-carry proposals - one of which was backed by the NRA - already have failed in the House. And with less than a month before a federally mandated June 9 deadline to end the nation's only remaining concealed-carry ban expires, the pressure is piling on the General Assembly.

Senate negotiations with the NRA do not appear to be making headway, and Raoul said he has yet to see the plan that House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) is working on, only that it will differ from Raoul's proposal.

"I'm always looking to forge a compromise with the House," Raoul said. "But I will always have the same priorities that I have."

Meanwhile, Attorney General Lisa Madigan has until June 24 to decide if she wants to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court the federal appeals court ruling that has the Legislature in such a hurry to pass concealed-carry legislation by the end of the month. Gov. Pat Quinn backs the move to appeal.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/57614

7 Comments

YES!!! We must defeat the Chicago Political Machine and their idea that they can control this state by proxy. Enough of the corruption and deceitful tactics of the Crook County Cronies, we want Shall Issue Conceal Carry and we want it to be STATEWIDE.

I bet the Senator would not call journalists defending their rights as expressed in the First Amendment 'extremists'. He Tunis guns are scary s he wants to effectively ban them. All his bill will do is create chaos and generate lawsuits that will cost the taxpayers millions to lose. I'm not an extremist. I believe in the Constitution and think all rights there are worth defending against politicians with agendas.

ALL OF THESE RULES FOR CARRY WILL HAVE TO MEET CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER BY THE APPEALS COURT SO IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THE LOCALS PASS CONCEAL CARRY OR THE STATE AS ALL REGS WILL HAVE TO MEET THE APPEALS COURT'S APPROVAL.

2 nd amendment right no B.S.

might as well give it and join the isra and nra face it what you proposed wasn't a bill it was to deny the citizens of chicago their right to the second amendment rights are not negotiable nor subject to the whims of tiny and mc535 and dar.t join the movement
and be part of the other 49 that can't be wrong

Extreamists? Because they wanted EVERYONE who passes a bacround check and is qualified to have a permit to get one. Extreamists because they believe no one should be able to be discriminated againstvand refused a court ordered right because of thier zip code. YOU SIR ARE THE EXTREAMIST

>>"One of the realities that I was keenly aware of when I entered this effort was that there are some extremists," said Sen. Kwame Raoul

Yes there are extremists. And one of them is named Kwame Raoul. Dumbocrats like him can't seem to comprehend that they are the problem.

Their intransigent anti-2nd Amendment extremism is the very thing that brought about this "crisis" in the first place. 98% [49 out of 50 states] of the USA has enjoyed concealed carry with absolutely no problems.

What makes the state of Illinois, the county of Cook and the city of Chicago so fundamentally different that they would not be able to do the same?

Leave a comment