Your local news source ::
      Select a community or newspaper »


 

« Sunday Lunch with Aleta St. James | Main | Yet another reason to be creeped out by the new 9/11 movie »

More pregnant ramblings to drive Steve Rhodes crazy

Broadsheet, the women's issues-oriented blog at Salon.com, has posted a whole host of pregnancy-related links, including one to this New Yorker article about research into preeclampsia.

The piece, written by author and Harvard medical school professor Jerome Groopman, touches upon some of the big themes I've been (much less articulately than Groopman) wrestling with in the last few weeks, including the strange dearth of serious research into pregnancy-related medical conditions and health risks, and the circumstances in which the best interests of a woman (health-wise) and those of the unborn baby she carries are directly opposed to one another.

(The Broadsheet summary of the article is here.)

There's also a link to the "Shape of a Mother" blog, something which, I must admit, I had a really hard time looking at. The photos of the round, pregnant bellies are one thing, but the stretch-marked and deflated post-partum abdomens are something else entirely. Rationally, of course, I understand that my body is not going to instantly snap back into its old form. But, somehow (probably we've been so trained to hide our "flab" from one another), I hadn't fully processed how much of a transition we're talking about. It seems totally shallow and vain to worry about such a thing, since, obviously, having a healthy baby is the most important thing, etc. etc. But, still . . . there's something disconcerting about the incredible length of time when your physical body just isn't you.

Personally, I'm still trying to wrap my head around the concept that I can feel and see my belly move (quite the future soccer player I'm carrying, thanks) and know that it's not me moving . . . it's a whole (or mostly whole at this point) other person. When you see pregnant women on TV or in the movies, they're always all, "Come here, honey, the baby's kicking," and misty-eyed husband comes and places his hand there to feel it. None of them seem at all weirded out by the whole Alien-esque quality of the experience.

In a certain way, it does, I imagine, begin to prepare you for the thrill ride that is parenthood. Any illusion that you are comepletely in control is pretty much out the window when you are, say, just about to fall alseep and your kid-to-be decides it's an excellent time to practice some of the latest in-utero dance moves.

I think then whole idea that there is soon going to be another person living in our home is still somewhat surreal/theoretical for R. (Honestly, it's only starting to be seem totally plausible to me.)

There's all this stuff that we probably should be doing, like starting to clear out our home office so that we can start converting it into a nursery, that we just don't seem to begin. It's a little embarassing that people keep asking about what we're doing to get ready (the term "layette" is thrown around with some frequency, which seems terrifyingly Victorian). Because, except for the Pack n' Play we bought so our friends' baby Charlotte would have a place to sleep when they visited, we haven't gotten a thing.

I've been trying to read the Consumer Reports Guide and Baby Bargains books (is it wrong to try to cheap out on some of this stuff?), but, seriously, it's confusing and sleep-inducing. (In all honesty, though, almost everything is sleep inducing at this point, at least when it's 90 degrees out.)

I guess, in some ways, I'm still holding on to the fantasy that the baby is not going to take up a lot of room in our lives, literally or metaphorically speaking. (I decided to actually write that sentence rather than just thinking it, as I have been, so that I can really laugh at myself a few months from now.)

Fortunately for me, my best friend is several months ahead of me on the motherhood curve and her experiences are offering something of a primer in what to expect (short, trite answer: the unexpected).

When you're as ignorant as I feel now (and reading all the books, which, being a serious study nerd, I am, of course doing, only makes me feel more clueless), a few weeks of experience looks an awful lot like serious wisdom.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1109

Comments

The more books I read, the worse I felt. I need less info, not more, in order to function. That said, tiny newborns do not need everything under the sun at the beginning. Diapers, clothes, blankets, a safe place to sleep. Everything else, you can send your husband out for on an as-needed basis.

I am the founder of the Preeclampsia Foundation (2000) and mom to four (4) boys (BOYS) and so appreciated your blog about pregnancy and Goopman's article. It is just comforting to see major news organizations finally recognizing the disease. Shockingly long-time in coming given that Laura Bush had a "near death" experience due to preeclampsia, and other celebrities who had preeclampsia to some degree: Debra Norville, Ann Curry, the late Wendy Wasserstein, Jane Seymour, and others. I think, ironically, it might be the fact contradiction (demonstrated by your other link to the Shape--eeeh--of a mother) between "glowing motherhood" and the ugly reality of a disease (a woman with preeclampsia is not a pretty sight) that keeps such celebrities from speaking out. Aside from a CNN anchor who had preeclampsia, who as a journalist cannot speak out on any issue, I am amazed these women don't champion this cause. Laura Bush's press secretary told me that she doesn't discuss her personal life. Except, apparently on OPRAH and several hundred times according to Lexis Nexis over the past ten years. The sad thing people believe preeclampsia has no lasting impact. That is sadly just not true. Studies from Yale (Funai, et al) show a woman who had preeclampsia has a 2x higher risk of early death due to heart disease than a woman who smokes...

So it is particularly ironic that Laura who is a spokeswoman for the American Heart Association refuses to lend her celebrity to raising awareness about a disease that impacts 5-7% of all pregnancies. As many women every year develop preeclampsia as do breast cancer...yet preeclampsia is listed as a Rare and Orphaned Disease.

At Chicago's Lying-in Hospital there is a blank Noble prize plaque already inscribed with like, "the one who discovered the cure for preeclampsia"...and Chicago is home to the preeminent preeclampsia researcher, Dr. Marshall Lindheimer.

Only this past year have drug companies lent financial support to the Preeclampsia Foundation (pharmas are typically major sources of funding for disease-related nonprofits) We are so thrilled for this change of heart. Johnson & Johnson CEO is serving as co-chair of our second annual fundraising gala: Saving Grace, a Night of Hope, San Francisco, CA, October 27th.

I know--I am rambling and ever passionate about this disease--simultaneously intrigued by the puzzle, shocked by the lack of public interest and information, and saddened by the unnecessary deaths.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)