Chicago Sun-Times
Tuning in with Thomas Conner

More "Juno" Fallout

| 9 Comments | 1 TrackBack

Comments have been rolling in since I first posted my critique of "Juno," the soundtrack and the film, on this blog last Tuesday. Yesterday, the article ran in the print edition of the Sun-Times, generating another wave of email.

Because it's unclear who the writer is if I post emails as comments (yo, Sun-Times Web gurus -- are you reading this? Can we fix it??), I've opted to run those emails below, with a few of my own comments interspersed in italics.

The critique has also generated some discussion on the blogosphere: here; here; here and here.

It is often said that in rock 'n' roll, the ultimate democratic art form, everybody's a critic. And I've never thought that movies should be any different.



I thought I was the only one who hated Juno.



I'm sure using the word "hate" three times in one sentence in your column about the film Juno has elicited much response, and perhaps by the time you get to this letter, if you ever get to it, you won't have much patience for criticism, but I hope you will listen carefully to what I have to say and rethink some of your claims.

My biggest beef with your column is that you seem to insist that there are no kids like Juno in the world. You call yourself "a reporter who regularly talks to actual teens as part of his beat," but apparently you have never met anyone like Juno. This is unfortunate, because while they may be few and far between, they are out there. I have been a high school English teacher for twenty years, teaching creative writing and other English classes to thousands of teens. In that role, I have not met very many Junos, but I can tell you they do exist. I can think of nearly a dozen kids, off the top of my head, who have inhabited my classroom, who were smart, sarcastic, and wisecracking in much the same way that Juno is.

You claim that the film does not ring true because it was shaped by a twenty-nine-year-old screenwriter, a thirty-year-old director, and a twenty-year-old actress. Unfortunately, teenagers do not have the resources to make films about themselves, but if they could, the teens who would have the skill to craft movies worth seeing would be kids like Juno—those rare, visionaries, whose voices rise out of the rubble of human speech and sound true because they are so cleverly sarcastic and wisecracking. As I said, I've taught kids like that, many of whom have gone on to contribute to the arts in a significant and sincere way. Of course, no one heard of them when they were teens, but now they are making their mark. You have even covered some of them on your beat.

I've had the privilege of working with kids who have gone on to become professional dancers, visual artists, screenwriters, journalists, and musicians. Angel Ledezma and the Kinsella brothers were students of mine, for example. I know you are familiar with their work. Whether you like them or not, you have to admit they are out there making smart music, contributing to the local music scene in ways that challenges the songwriters in their midst. They were the same way when they were seventeen. They were a lot like Juno. Their writing—much of which I still have stashed in manilla folders in my classroom filing cabinets—would surprise you because it doesn't sound like the kind of writing you would expect from a teenager. In fact, it probably sounds more like something a thirty-something screenwriter would write. That's because they, like Juno, were older than their years.

That's the key to Juno's success; she is not a normal teenager. After all, how many teenage girls would show up on their boyfriend's lawn in a recliner, smoking a pipe, to tell him he's going to be a dad? It is because she is so unusual that she is so authentic. Likewise, Juno's seemingly conflicted taste in music also rings true precisely because of her passion for musicians who, on the surface, seem to have little in common. I am not trying to say that this is a flawless soundtrack—for me it's trying a bit too hard to be Garden State—but your suggestion that "there isn't a hint of anger and lust for life…in the sort of tween indie-rock that Juno loves" is shortsighted.

I would argue that from a teenage music lover's perspective, there may not be such a cavernous distance between Iggy Pop and Belle & Sebastian. Again, Tim Kinsella, though he's no longer a teenager, is a good example I think; he's an Iggy Pop fan, yet it was Tim who introduced me to Belle & Sebastian. To me, today's mopey, Emo rockers are yesterday's punks. I mean, don't you think if Cat Power were making music in 1979 she would have sounded a lot like Patti Smith? In fact, I would be willing to bet Patti is one of the Cat's biggest influences. Anyway, who says that the greatest punks never made room for saccharine? Look at the Replacements. Paul Wetserberg's own band mates used to teasingly call him James Taylor!

As I said the soundtrack is not perfect, and I don't believe Juno is a perfect movie either. What I'm trying to say is that I feel you've relied on faulty logic to attack the film and its soundtrack, and frankly, I've come to expect more of you, so I was disappointed when I read your column this morning. I certainly don't expect you to print a retraction after reading this letter, Jim, but maybe you will revisit your thoughts, and maybe you will eventually reduce your assessment to one use of the word "hate" instead of three. That would be enough for me.


Mark Maxwell

P. S. By the way, I too have a daughter who loves Hannah Montana and is about to embark upon her teenage years, and I hope she doesn't make the same mistakes Juno made, but if she, like so many other smart but horny teens before her, does something stupid when the hormones kick in, I will try to treat my daughter the same way Juno's father treated her, and I hope my daughter will have the courage to face her mistakes the same way Juno did, John Travolta strut and all. I suspect you'd want the same from your daughter.


You were not the only reader to remark on my use of "hated, hated, hated," Mark. That was a nod to my esteemed colleague, Roger Ebert, who chose "Juno" as his favorite film of 2007; my favorite of his many fine books is, of course, "I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie." I hear Roger's going to have his say about my critique Friday in his "Answer Man" column. Not surprisingly, I hear he disagrees with me.

Hey, the man is my hero, and one of the few writers truly worthy of Oscar Wilde's notion of "the critic as artist." But I still think he's wrong about this one!

Regarding teens actually listening to Belle & Sebastian or the Moldy Peaches: I don't buy it for an instant. Their audience is comprised of mid- to late-twentysomethings, and people (much) older. I know: I've seen both groups many times, and never seen any Junos in the crowd. And three high school teachers and music fans of my acquaintance concurred that their kids don't like anything that even remotely sounds like the "Juno" soundtrack.

Yes, I'm willing to grant that "Juno" is a movie, not reality. But the music sucked any way you want to take it.



After twice reading your review of "Juno" in today's Suntimes, I am writing to offer a different point of view.

First, I understand the you were reviewing the music and soundtrack, not the movie, per se, but you do give some personal opinions with which I disagree.

All movies have a story to tell. The plot of Juno gives one side of one person's decision. If Juno had used birth control, there would be no story. The real point is that even bright, self-empowered children make bad decisions and then have to live with the consequences.

I don't think the movie was 'preachy'. It didn't delve deeply into how Juno made her decision not to have an abortion or why she chose an open, private adoption vs. going through an agency.

In the 'real world', I don't believe that any parent's initial reaction to Juno's situation would be as positive as portrayed but this is Juno's story, not her parents'. They are portrayed as caring, loving, and supportive of her decision and I think most parents would get there, eventually.

I felt the initial portrayal of the young couple's yearning to have a family was realistic. The plot didn't go into the story of why they were choosing to adopt but another point the movie did make was that having a baby will not help keep a marriage together, no matter how much you want it to.

As the mother of four adopted children, now adults, and the grandmother of 5, I have said, "Thank you, God.", many times that there were four young (ages 14-17) birth mothers who chose adoption.

I saw Juno with my 12 year old granddaughter, who thought the music was "cool", the movie "good", and the text message short-hand "acurate". Contrary to me - her old grammy - she knew all the music.





I only get into concerts for free, Marilyn. Movies are on my own dime most of the time. I did get the soundtrack album for free, though.



I just got done reading your article in today's Sun-Times and as a fifteen-year-old girl, i have to completely disagree. You seem to have forgotten about all the teenagers who aren't caught up in rap and hip-hop music and who happen to love the music our parents may have listened to at our age. I saw 'Juno' on Friday night and the moment i got home, i got the soundtrack. Not every teen is obsessed with Paris Hilton's new style or Jay-Z's new rap album. Simon and Garfunkel, who appears on the album, happens to be a favorite band of mine. I respect your opinion about the soundtrack, but honestly, you claim to be the father of an "almost teen" but who says everyone is exactly like your teenager? No one.



Your review of Juno could not have been more offbase or poorly argued. Like you, I'll offer no examples or evidence of any kind to support my theory.

To employ your argument's structure and thorough lack of contextual evidence: Are we really supposed to believe you saw the same movie we did?



Jim - It's a movie, dude! Not a documentary. Talk to some teens and they'll tell you they liked Juno for the same reason they liked Ferris Beuller--they are characters far cooler, far more confident and self-possessed than most teens. And they're funny. Having a kid and listening to lots of music doesn't give you any special insight into young people. Stick to your YOUR opinion, which is often interesting. Plenty of people (high school teachers, for example) have WAY more of a handle on what teens think. Enough to know they can't speak for them. Or be the arbiters of authenticity.



I just saw Juno yesterday, so the headline of your article caught my attention. I'm a high school math teacher (Ebert's--age just can't afford to retire), so many statements in your commentary rang true. High school kids just aren't as clever and cheeky as Juno's dialog allowed her to be. I, too, took issue with her understanding dad and shrewed step mom who never said they wanted to help raise their future grandchild. And I agree that the Jason Bateman character upstages the teenager with his longing for a musical career that seems so impractical.

But you're a music critic, not a movie critic. (Unfortunately, everyone who goes to the movies thinks giving movie reviews is pretty much second nature--I'm guilty here too. I hated, hated, hated Million Dollar Baby. I felt cheated thinking I was seeing one kind of movie that ended up another. I hated, hated, hated Babel. I thought it set up women and children as victims while men strutted their bravado. But, both were so memorable and thought provoking--though I'd never watch either of them again.

I ramble. I know nothing about music. Nothing. Don't particularly like it. I listen to Christmas music. There. You know what that says of me. Would just as soon enjoy the silence of my house or car. Ironically, all my sons have been, or still are, musicians. If you're interested, my son Paul has a website at
I understand he's "locally famous" in Urbana.

Anyway, I read your column only to hand on articles to my sons. None of them would consider reading the Sunday paper on Saturday evening.

But to get back to Juno. I think you're going to get a lot of contrary emails about it. There was a gaggle of teenage girls at the theater yesterday sitting not far from me who were captivated by it. Maybe they admired what they perceived of her daring personality.

I left the theater humming the music and thinking it was catchy in "It's a Small World After All" kind of way. (Which nobody likes, but I wouldn't mind collecting its royalties.) But then, I'm rarely aware of soundtracks--just a visual learner, I guess.

Anyway, I'm writing that your musical review of the soundtrack is probably right on target, but I have to agree with Ebert this time about the movie. I liked it despite the fact it was phony. Or maybe because it was.

I often think you columnists would find it hard to imagine all the different kinds of people that your articles touch. I guess I'm just one of them.



Dear Mr. Derogatis: Thanks for an excellent critique of a bad movie. Until you I thought I was alone in hatred for it. My reasons are identical to yours. One must ask: Of what were the "other" film critics thinking? Could they not see through it?



This is why you and I get along so well: we can't stand crap like "Juno." Long story short, I hated this movie. I needed an anti-cutesy chaser to cleanse my palate (Hitchcock's "Psycho" was on AMC, perfect timing).



I am sixteen years old, my name is Emanuel Vinson. I am a musician and songwriter, contributing to various projects. My favorite albums of last year include In Rainbows, Menomena's Friend and Foe, American Gangster, & your much maligned The Reminder.

My favorite films of last year are Hot Fuzz, Once and There Will Be Blood.

So, in response to your review on Juno: As a teenager, as a teenager with many teenage friends, as a teenager with many indie teenage friends, as a teenager with indie teenage friends who saw Juno, I must say-

you were totally wrong.

I've disagreed with you many times before (The Reminder, your laughable declarations of the greatness of The Ramones on Sound Opinions), but this is one time where I felt compelled to send you a letter- specifically because you felt entitled to spout in your column about how you like, totally talk to teenagers sometimes, and from what you know, they don't talk like that.

I assure you that my friends and I do. When I say "talk like Juno," I mean with our own obscure slang terms and vernacular that seem incomprehensible to outsiders. Obviously were you to wander upon a conversation of us talking it would seem nonsensical, with generous helpings of references to Trapped in the Closet, James Brown interviews, and splices of memorable unintentionally funny quotations from Will Smith films ("THE GODDAMN ROBOTS JOHN").

It may seem silly, it may seem ridiculous, but however it is us. We are not the average teenager, but we exist. And we are the ones who made the soundtrack to Juno the number one iTunes album in America (or did you think that droves mid 30 somethings were the ones rocking "Anyone Else But You" on their iPods?). That is why I do not scoff when Juno says "honest to blog" because if it were a real saying, it probably would have come from a series of other observations about quirks of celebrity/internet culture that combined into a catchall ironic term.

I could list dozens of inside jokes that we have, that far eclipse the ridiculousness of anything Juno says in the first 20 minutes of the film. And many of my friends have seen Juno, and all of us loved it. Not to mention that many of us, including myself, had been listening to The Moldy Peaches since before we even saw the film. And your derision of their infantile lyrics and barely there musicianship is very ironic, considering, again, your love of The Ramones and their stone-stupid riffs and songs like KKK Took My Baby Away (which makes a terrible murderous organization that has ruined an innumerable amount of lives a metaphor for Joey whining about losing his girlfriend) . So if we're getting up in arms about music taking BIG ISSUES seriously, like teenage suicide, I suggest we all take a look in the mirror. Or at least in our record collection.

I think it is even more ironic how, in your attempt to deride the filmmakers as condescending in their faulty understanding of teenagers, you proved to be far more off the mark than they were. And I'm wondering how you assume that none of them talk to teens, and are so out of touch, when they're all ten years (at least) younger than you. What would make them so much less likely to understand the teenage psyche than you? Absolutely nothing, as your review has proven.

To comments about the seriousness of abortion & the response of the parents
1: Juno made a personal decision, and the film did not make it seem as if it were all just for poops and giggles. It showed that there were definite problems to deciding to keep the child, but it ended up being good for them. Just because someone doesn't prefer abortion doesn't mean they're ANTI-ABORTION AND THUS ANTI-WOMEN. Please, there's absolutely no need to take it there. Grasping for straws.

2. The response of the parents was totally consistent with their characterizations. And they were realistic well-rounded characters as a whole. So it is another unnecessary gripe.

When it comes to assessing real teenagers, and people in general- you are the phony, not the makers of Juno. You've shown a lack of understanding and an abundance of ignorance on the topic of the subtleties and differences of people and the decisions they make. It is a wonderful film, please stick to doing Saul Williams reviews.



Dear Mr. Derogatis, I found your anti-Juno article on Sunday a bit far fetched, though you made some valid points. I think that perhaps since it was not the typical "teen movie" played by actors well over the teen-age (i.e. breakfast club, Empire Records, etc.), you have been a bit thrown off. I applaud the movie for the very different approach it has taken to coming of age genera. And I also feel, not to demean your character, that being a man a few of your points are a little narrow minded based on your age and inability to reproduce. I appreciate you have a teenage daughter, but being a female teen not too long ago, I think your "anti-abortion = anti-woman" comment is a representation of your generation. I am not saying that I am pro-life, but I can respect a character who is willing to think of someone else's life beyond her own. I know girls in high school, bright girls, who have done the same. I found that to be a breath of fresh air. Also, if she had decided to go through with the abortion, that would not have left much of a movie. It's been done.

As far as your rips on the music chosen for the film. Juno is one of those movies where the music plays into every scene and creates the entire feel for the film. The choices may have been simplistic, but I think for worked. It had a Garden State feel, but not the same level of musical talent. Iron and Wine would not have worked with this film, they are too complex in my opinion. And as far as Jason Bateman's taste in music...of course it is going to be better, he lived through a much better era. Hence why he was sharing his knowledge with Juno in the film. I am just happy to see that Juno wasn't jamming on what teens listen to these days. I pity the kids who have to grow up and "back in there day" will mean Brittney Spears, Black Eyed Peas, Good Charlotte, and Fall Out Boy. Personally, I would have welcomed more Sonic Youth...but it isn't realistic for the time. The true hipsters and outcasts who live and breath the underground scene are always looking for something more, something that hasn't been heard before, and once everyone hears it...they drop it like a bad habit. Not everyone gets a truly eclectic musical education these days...maybe you can pass one on to your daughter, but I would hope that you do not also limit her own choice to listen to something different.

Thanks for listening



You sure are smart -- no wonder I love you! i hate hate hate when a movie about "Kids" written & created by old folks is hailed by other old folks as really getting the "kids of today." So your Juno piece really hit home- excellent job shoveling through the BS as usual



Dear Jim, I loved your column yesterday about Juno. I haven't seen it, but from everything I've read, it's so glib. I'm an adoptive parent, and I know a lot of adoptive parents and birthparents. The result of unwanted teen pregnancy can give adoptive parents their dream of being parents, but for the teen who places her child with them, it is a heartwrenching decision. In our case, our birthmother received a lot of criticism from co-workers and associates asking how she could "give up" her baby--often, from people who had had several abortions. She was very strong and I admire her so. She was not a cautionary whale, just a girl in a bad place who did a very brave and difficult thing.



I agree with you about the annoying, unrealistic dialogue given to the Juno character. Ellen Page's ultra-deadpan delivery didn't help, either. Together they made her into a cartoon. I think this kind of dialogue can work okay on the page, but sounds ridiculous when spoken aloud.
You left out "Ghost World", the comic and the movie, as an example of realistic-sounding and acting contemporary teenage girls. And it was written by a thirty-something man. Go figure.



All I really have to say is "thank you" "thank You" "Thank You" for your insight and courage in your music, movie, morals review of Juno.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL:

View image A teenage romantic fairy tale. I'm a little confused about precisely where we stand at this very moment in the "Juno" backlash cycle, but I predict the anti-backlash backlash will begin any moment now if it hasn't already.... Read More


Just a small comment, I'm 18 years old and according to my iTunes, Belle & Sebastian are my fourth most-played artist. Just behind The Beatles, Bob Dylan, and The Ramones. In fact, I just listened to their whole discography again last Friday, as I felt it had been too long since hearing some of it. Great band, that I've spent a lot of time listening to the last couple of years, although I've never seen them live. So yeah, some teens out there love Belle & Sebastian.

Ugh. Jim, you got the right on about this movie. If Juno is so smart and she originally respects Jason Batemans characters taste in music and crummy horror movies so much why does she think he needs her to tell him who Mott the Hoople is? Im willing to bet if you investigated his characters record collection you would find every Mott the Hoople record along with every Ian Hunter record along with some crazy Hunter bootlegs and so on and so forth. This movie such a contrived piece of Oscar bait that I fail to see the difference between it and Atonement. I think this is a new trend film: the quirky movie that is all heart and thinks its way too clever for its own good. Do you know how you would feel if you drank a whole gallon of Sunny Delight? A mild desire to urinate would be the least of your problems I would think. Any movie that has two characters talking candidly about their favorite bands and movies is trying way too hard. there has to be a natural organic way for these conversations to evolve, oh wait, there is and they do it in High Fidelity throughout the entire movie. I suggest everyone just go watch High Fidelity and forget that Juno even exists.


I could not disagree with you more. I think Juno is an outstanding film. I am eighteen years of age, and to say there are no teenagers like Juno is ridiculous, because there are. The way my friends and I talk about music and film is almost exactly like the wonderful dialogue written by Diablo Cody. Not every teen in the world listens to Linkin Park and watches American Pie. You should know that.
You mention in your review that you are an "old school feminist", what the hell does that mean? Do you feel the filmmakers should apologize because Juno chooses to have her baby? Do you feel there should be a text at the end of the film that reads,
"..Just to let you all know, Fox Searchlight and the filmmakers are Pro-Choice!"
This film is not about the debate over a woman's right to choose. It is a story, and a work of art. Ellen Page is brilliant in the title role, and there is NOTHING false about the performance. The soundtrck is pretty damn good. What do you have against Belle and Sabastian? You claim to be in contact with teenagers, I hope you encounter more people like me at concerts.

Just quickly interjecting, I'm also one of the weirdos who was a big Moldy Peaches fan in high school. I graduated in 05. One of my few friends in high school was a Belle and Sebastian nut (I personally don't care for them myself). So I ask you, "Who's Got the Crack?"

As it has already been said, Juno is a piece of fiction, not a documentary. Whether or not "real" teenagers talk like Juno should not be the point. The question to ask yourself is whether you liked Juno talking that way. My answer is yes - Ellen Page managed to keep the smart dialogue sound authentic coming out of her teenager character's mouth, so to me it sounded real even if it doesn't mirror the dialogue of the majority of high school kids.

Once again, Juno wasn't portrayed to be the majority. Moviegoers don't want to see the majority. Why? The majority is us. The majority is boring. We want to see movies about the star quarterback, not the second string lineman. We want to see movies about the quirky, smarter-than-her-years teen with social issues and the small issue of BEING PREGNANT, not the B student with a perfect family life.

From the obvious money-making big budget blockbusters to the low budget "indie" movies, the idea is the same: provide the viewers with characters that are relatable but funnier, smarter, crazier, more evil, more perfect, etc. Striking the perfect balance between interesting and believability is the most important aspect for a filmmaker/writer/director to understand. In Juno's case, I, like most viewers and critics, thought the balance was perfect. You did not, and that is simply your opinion. We agree to disagree and such is life in America!

I’m a fifty-seven year old woman without children. That fate seats me in the minority section of my ilk and shapes my perception. I haven’t watched TV since the 2000 presidential election and I saw only two movies all of last year, both documentaries.

In a sense, I’m the worst and the best reviewer of the reviews. And, I find the reviews on this blog equal to if not far more interesting than the movie itself. Why? It completes the movie. It represents life as it truly is, diverse. A patchwork of innocence, intention, bias, confusion, struggle, disingenuousness, brilliance, awkwardness, hope, fears, arrogance, dysfunction, far and shortsightedness, and the spectrum of human strengths and frailties oscillating through young and old minds alike. Right here on this blog. They merge in these reviews and shape something meaningful and insightful for all to observe, consider, and reflect.

I think one risk’s missing the larger point by pointing out what it misses. Of course there are valid points on both sides. These are nuggets with one exception. As an intelligent woman with a broad sense of where we came from historically, where we are today, and the combined trajectory of that potential future path, I find no thoughtful reason to associate this film with hate. At least not the variety intended by Webster and racist. To hate, one first has to close their mind and a closed mind is absent value.

I readily recognize the time compression experienced by our youth of today. I recognize the environmental, financial,social and moral debt load facing today’s youth as a result of the previous generation’s folly as was the folly of my parent’s generation and there’s before them all the way back to the beginning of civilization 13,000 years ago.

Although I can recognize these things as challenges for youth, I can’t experience them directly as they do in myriad of different manifestations not unlike this film. There’s no reason to suspect that the youth of today are any less unique than the youth of anytime. Only the non-linear circumstances change, exponentially compressed like the worlds population increases adding the first billion after millions of years and last billion in twelve.

As to the abortion issue, is it persuasively pro-choice or something else? This question has been in the consciousness of humans dating back to proto-humans when a woman could only carry one child and a few tools of absolute necessity. Infanticide and abortion where the survival mechanisms then and remain so today in many countries. The more important question to consider is choice itself. What are those choices and what shapes those choices. The movie demonstrates merely one path, one choice option after considering others. Knowing one has choice is the greater reality.

I found this movie as interesting as the energetic youth which dominated the screening and whose compressed lifestyles were betrayed by the many digital lights emitting off/on from their cell phones staying focused on their fast changing worlds while watching the movie at the same time. You won't fit this youth group into a tidy, convenient box nor is average a representational possibility in a time-compressed world. I find the commentary as interesting as the movie because of the diversity of views expressed. If not for this diversity, neither the movie nor the comments would resonate with much meaning for anyone – those who discovered appreciation and those who discovered something less - Perhaps the best argument for this film is the argument itself.

Ellen Page, who was 19 when the movie was made, was asked by the producer and director what type of music would Juno listen to -- she told them "The Moldy Peaches".

So, if most of this is about the music, the choice came from a 19 year old, which NEWFLASH, makes her 3 years older than the character she played.


I'm no psychoanalyst, but I have a sneaking suspicion that your identification with Jason Bateman's character has colored your view of the film to the extreme. How could you have anything but contempt for a film where a middle-aged Sonic Youth-lover is shown to be immature enough that he has a crush on a sixteen year-old girl? It's like they specifically made *you* the bad guy.

I too, found this film annoying - being that the main character is very irritating and not believable. I feel that people do not speak the way she does - 100% of the time - if at all. It would have been better to have the dialog be more of a mix of true reactions and real communicating rather than similar to a doll that you pull the string on and have it say something calculated or supposedly "clever". I couldn't stand her nonchalant or cocky demeanor. It's as if she rarely had to stop to think or react - people just aren't like this.

Sadly, this detracted from the other great actors, their natural reactions and limited dialog to pale in comparison, since she was created to be such an overbearing presence, as if the other characters were "props" in Juno's world. Everything the lead character uttered grated on me and I kept hoping it would change. It infuriates me that she is portrayed as a supposedly "interesting", mature, sharp, witty person. I'm afraid that people may try to emulate this behavior - UGH. My point is - nothing rang true for me - except for the other actors' characters. Now, if Ms. Page's lines had been written to portray more real interacting, I may not be writing this. Just to mention, I know the "Hamburger phone" was for laughs, but do you think someone like this girl would even use a phone like that? More like a pre-teen, maybe.

I don't feel that references being made here to abortion or pro-life has much to do with it - that is not the focus of the film. Likewise, the soundtrack - I just found that to be incidental. It frustrates me that the film has been promoted as a "superior" film - and convinces people that it "must be the case".

I have seen references here to other films with young characters such as "The Breakfast Club" and "Ferris Bueller" for example - which are not only clever and funny, but depict characters who actually communicate with each other within more believable dialog. I would like to reference the great film "American Beauty" which is more serious, but I believe is an example of accurately depicting teen personalities and possible experiences.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jim DeRogatis published on January 14, 2008 10:05 AM.

Ringo Starr, “Liverpool 8” (Capitol) [1 STAR] was the previous entry in this blog.

And even a little bit more "Juno" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.