" /> Mary Mitchell: February 2007 Archives
Your local news source ::
      Select a community or newspaper »


tv listings blogs video centerstage entertainment yellow pages jobs media kit advertising info restaurant reviews eating in roger ebert sudoku crossword lottery obits commentary Letters to the editor horoscopes

« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 16, 2007

Pastors and politics

According to a story by Washington Bureau Chief, Lynn Sweet, the Clinton camp has hired http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/260162,CST-NWS-obama16.article
a firm headed by South Carolina state Sen. Darrell Jackson as a consultant for her campaign. The deal is worth at least $10,000 a month.

Barack Obama sought to hire the same consultant, but Clinton sealed the deal. Jackson is the same man who told the Associated Press on Tuesday that he was supporting Clinton because she is "our best shot." What I don't get is why so many black people believe leaders like him are using their power to benefit the marginalized masses?

Besides running a political consulting business, Jackson pastors a 10,000-member church and serves in the South Carolina state legislature.

Help us lord.

Why are black lawmakers already jumping on Clinton bandwagon?

Mitchell column: Februay 15, 2007

Skepticism I understand. But when two black male legislators from the Deep South throw their hats in Hillary Clinton's ring at the start of a wide-open election, I want to slap them upside their heads.

Why are these black men so eager to drive Miss Hillary to the White House when Illinois' U.S. Sen. Barack Obama is also a front-runner?

State Senators Robert Ford and Darrell Jackson are considered key black political leaders in South Carolina because they backed John Edwards in 2004 and managed to hand Edwards 37 percent of the vote in a state where half the primary voters are black.

For those of you who don't understand why we keep harping on early primaries, it's simple. If a presidential candidate wins an early primary state -- like Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- deep-pocket donors keep funding their campaigns.

The losing candidates are well on their way to becoming also-rans.

So you tell me why Ford and Jackson found it necessary to tell reporters that they were driving Miss Hillary so early in the game.

"It's a slim possibility for [Obama] to get the nomination, but then everybody else is doomed," Ford told a reporter with the Associated Press on Tuesday.

"Every Democrat running on that ticket next year would lose because he's black and he's top of the ticket. We'd lose the House and the Senate and the governors and everything," he said. "I'm a gambling man. I love Obama," Ford said. "But I'm not going to kill myself."

This, from a man who claims in his bio that from 1966 to 1972, at the height of the civil rights movement, he was arrested 73 times as a staff member with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

With friends like these . . .
After coming under fierce criticism for comments that sounded a lot like the buzzwords some Democrats have long used to justify keeping African Americans off the top of the ticket, Ford, 59, apologized:

"If I caused anybody, including myself, any pain about the comments I made earlier, then I want to apologize to myself and to Senator Obama and any of his supporters," Ford said.

Jackson, who pastors a large congregation and also refers to himself as a businessman, says he considers Obama a "friend" but considers Clinton "our best shot."

If Jackson calls himself Obama's friend, I'd hate to see what he does to his foes. Why is it these black men, who obviously benefitted from the support of black people in their own political campaigns, like Clinton's chances better than Obama's?

Like any other Democratic presidential candidate, Clinton is dependent upon the black vote to put her over the top, and Jackson and Ford have the resources to churn out that vote.

So why don't they have as much faith in a black man as they do in a white woman?

A story a friend shared recently with me offers some clues. He recalled an incident in which he encountered Obama in the halls of the Illinois State Capitol. My friend was the only black person in a group that was in Springfield to lobby black legislators on a piece of insurance legislation.

Although Obama wasn't on the list, my friend said he passed him in the hall.

"There was a moment when Obama stopped and looked at us and indicated that he was open to talk. I looked at him as if he was just another light-skinned black man in a position of power," my friend said. "That's the thought that immediately crossed my mind. Now, I feel like I owe him," he said.

What does it mean to be black?
Forget that Obama's bid for the presidency will force some whites to deal with any preconceived notions they have about black men. It is forcing blacks to check themselves, as well.

The discomfort some blacks have with Obama has nothing to do with his resume nor his ethnicity, but with the simple fact that he is a light-skinned black man who was able to cross over into mainstream America. The Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. couldn't do that. And the Rev. Al Sharpton certainly couldn't do it.

For me, the black experience has been growing up in poverty in a public housing project and overcoming that poverty to achieve a measure of success. For a dear friend, the black experience has been growing up in a solidly middle-class neighborhood -- after her family escaped the armed conflicts that once ravaged Nigeria. In fact, can anyone tell me what it means to be black these days?

The real problem here is that too many black leaders have lost confidence. They've given up on the hope in what they do could improve the quality of life for the people who put them in office in the first place, and it shows in our communities.

Political leaders like Robert Ford and Darrell Jackson are guarding their political turf in the same way drug dealers guard street corners. But worse, they are hatin' on a brother who dares to believe anything is possible.

February 01, 2007

Biden is showing his age

Comments by U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) (64) illustrate why the 2008 election will probably turn out to be a fight between Old-School politics vs. New- School politics--with New-School politicians coming out on top.

In sizing up U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, what did Biden mean when he told the New York Observer: "[Y]ou got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy?"

Besides exposing his ignorance, Biden's remarks were typical of what some whites think about successful blacks. These high-powered African-Americans aren't like their heathen brothers--and in Oprah's case--heathen sisters.

Most successful African-Americans have experienced the moment when a well-meaning white person told them something like:""You're not like other black people" or "You're different from other blacks."
More than likely, they formed their opinions based on the images of African-Americans they have seen in the media.

But Biden was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1972, the same year the late Shirley Chisholm became the first black woman to run for president. He was in the Senate for both of the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson's campaigns, and when Carol Moseley Braun and the Rev. Al Sharpton used a presidential campaign as a platform to debate critical issues affecting African Americans.

There's no excuse for this kind of ignorance.

Biden's blunder shows just how out-of-touch he really is.