Should Larry Fitzgerald be a first round pick?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Larry Fitzgerald is going late in the first round in nearly all fantasy drafts. It makes sense. All of the available running backs are likely to carry asterisks. Why not grab the consensus best receiver available?

The problem is that though Fitzergerald is one of the three best real life receivers in the NFL - Andre Johnson and Randy Moss are in that group, too - to be the great fantasy receiver, he needs double digit touchdowns. Last year he had 12. That's good enough. But remember Kurt Warner has lots of other options. And opponents should be more geared in on Fitzgerald than ever before. It wouldn't be a big surprise to see his numbers take a bit of a hit.

At least that's what ESPN's Matthew Berry thinks.

As I mentioned in my 100 facts column, six of Fitz's 12 touchdowns last season came in the four games Anquan Boldin missed. If you look at Fitzgerald's production of the past three years in games in which Boldin played, they are statistically the same player. And Boldin is being drafted two rounds later.

Take that for what it's worth.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Should Larry Fitzgerald be a first round pick?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/25560

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About the bloggers

Matt Wood is a web editor for suntimes.com and editor of CenterstageChicago.com. He is also a contributor for satirical sports publication The Heckler. Have a fantasy question? E-mail him.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ricky O'Donnell published on September 8, 2009 3:17 PM.

The Jets want Brandon Marshall. Do you? was the previous entry in this blog.

Running backs to like in Week 1 is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages