Rock Hudson's secret

   

Rock_Hudson_Quiff_Hairstyle.jpg

By Roger Ebert / July 20, 1986

If Rock Hudson had collapsed in Los Angeles instead of in a Paris hospital, he would have died with all of his secrets still intact.

Knowing he had only weeks or months to live, Hudson and his friends planned a scenario in which he would be taken to a condo in Palm Desert, where a hospice-like environment would be created. Male nurses, sworn to secrecy, would care for him, and when he died the cause of death would be given out as a heart attack or cirrhosis of the liver.

There would have been no mention of AIDS, no revelation that Hudson was gay, none of the personal details that are now the subject of two new books and countless magazine and TV articles.That's the opinion of Sara Davidson, whose authorized biography, Rock Hudson: His Story (William Morrow & Co. Inc., $16.95), is based on interviews with Hudson during the last 27 days of his life, and revelations by his closest friends.

"A lot of people said it was so brave of Rock to admit that he had AIDS," Davidson told me. "But actually he wanted it to be hushed up. He thought of AIDS as the plague. It made him feel unclean, and he felt it would destroy the image he had carefully built up over 35 years. If he had collapsed in L.A., he would have been taken to a place like Cedars-Sinai, a hospital used to hushing up the details of movie stars' illnesses. The news would never have leaked out, just as it hasn't in the case of several other AIDS deaths of famous people.

"But he collapsed in Paris, and the officials at the American Hospital were enraged. They didn't accept AIDS cases in the hospital, and they said either he would have to announce it, or they would. When the statement was drafted, Rock"s publicist and his secretary read it to him, and all he said was, "Go ahead, it"s been hidden long enough." He was shocked at the response to the announcement: The cover of Newsweek, the 28,000 letters of support from fans, the sudden interest in AIDS research and fund-raising. I think the response gave him a lot of comfort in his last days."

In her book, Davidson creates a portrait of a man who was homosexual all of his life, yet successfully created a screen image as a romantic lead, and kept his private life secret. "He had a gentleman"s agreement with the press," she said. "They didn"t ask the obvious questions. As a result, he developed a sort of love-hate thing with the press, based on a certain contempt. When the announcement about AIDS was approved, he said, "Throw it to the dogs."

Although Davidson"s book reveals hundreds of details that Hudson preferred to keep secret over the years, it cannot, she said, answer the question of how Hudson was infected with AIDS.

"He had the disease for a long time before it was diagnosed," she said during a recent Chicago visit. "Perhaps as long as three to five years. He may have been one of the earlier cases. When he learned that he had it, he said, "Why me? I don't know anyone who has AIDS." It was thought that perhaps Marc Christian, his last lover, was the source, but Christian tested negative. Rock wrote anonymous letters to his last three sex partners, telling them they might have been exposed, but he may have had AIDS long before meeting them. There just wasn't any obvious source of AIDS around him."

In your book, I said, you write about a trip Hudson made to San Francisco, where he and a friend went sight-seeing in some of the wilder gay leather bars. Is it possible that he engaged in sexual practices common in those bars, and got AIDS that way?

"I"m not at liberty to say," she said, somewhat surprisingly.

Were there restrictions placed on what you could or couldn"t say in the book?

"Ninety-nine percent of my original manuscript is still in the book. The parts that were taken out deal primarily with Marc Christian, who is involved in legal action. Actually, I found out a lot more about Rock Hudson's sex life than I wanted to put in the book. I know what he liked, and how, and with whom, but I didn't think it was in good taste to go into all the graphic details.

"Even so, I've been attacked for going too far. Liz Smith and Marilyn Beck were on 'Good Morning America' and they said, "With friends like Sara Davidson, who needs enemies?" But the book is the result of my conversations with Rock and his closest friends, and I believe it tells the truth."

Did Hudson engage in some of the more bizarre gay sexual practices?

"No. He wasn"t into S & M, for example. He was basically a very romantic man. He was like a woman; he'd run and tell his friends when he'd found someone new that he was in love with. He always believed there was one single right person for him, Mr. Right, and he was always looking for that person, and always finding him."

And one day, a Mr. Right gave him AIDS.

"Not necessarily. One of the possibilities is that he got it through a blood transfusion in 1981, when he was in Cedars-Sinai for open-heart surgery. The hospital is right in the middle of West Hollywood, a largely gay community, and little was known in those days about the dangers of AIDS from blood transfusions. It"s as likely a theory as any."

How much time did you really spend with Hudson? How much of the book is really his own story?

"I spent the last 27 days of his life visiting his home every day. He wanted to tell his story and he told all of his friends to cooperate with me. He had his good days and his bad days. Some days he"d be feeling well enough to come downstairs, ask for food, visit with friends. His mind would be perfectly lucid. In fact, his mind was always alert and clear. The people who say he was out of his mind at the end weren"t there to make that kind of judgment. But obviously I knew I wouldn't have nearly as much time with him as I wanted, and so before I even agreed to write the book I spent time with Mark Miller, his secretary, trying to find out what was known, and who knew it, and if they would talk. I was satisfied.

"One surprising thing was that there were so few good articles written by other people about Rock. He was not a good interview. I hired a researcher to look through clippings, and our conclusion was that in 35 years he never gave a good interview to anyone, except once for an oral history project at Southern Methodist, where for some reason he opened up and talked for hours to a professor, maybe because he thought it was for posterity. In most interviews he was wooden and impersonal. And yet in person he was so lively and likable. It was said that the only way to really get him to open up was to spend hours drinking with him."

Was he an alcoholic?

"In the last 10 or 15 years of his life, he drank a lot. It wasn't easy, going from the No. 1 box office star in the world to No. 2, No. 6, and then dropping off the list altogether. The irony is that he just started to hit his stride as an actor in the 1960s, when handsome leading men like himself were on the way out. He looked at the new stars like Dustin Hoffman and called them the "Little Uglies." He hated them because they didn't have perfect faces. Rock Hudson never took a bad picture."

"His career was absolutely of first importance for him. He placed it ahead of everything. When he read the script and saw the kiss, he agonized over it, but finally he decided to go ahead. I say in the book that he gargled with every known mouthwash. Actually, if you look at the kiss, he didn't open his lips and it was sort of a chaste peck on the cheek."

But even at that point in his illness, he was still taking his career that seriously?

"He had so much denial. After he was no longer a top box office star, he never developed other avenues -- like producing, developing his own projects, things like that. He wanted to act right up until his dying breath. He appeared on those "Dynasty" episodes where he looked so thin and gaunt, and he would look at them, and say he looked like he did in his younger days. When he went to do that TV program ("Doris Day's Best Friends") with Doris Day, his life was literally hanging by a thread. He hadn't had real nourishment in two months. She was so bouncy and full of pep, so vivacious, and there was Rock, the same age, and he was in such obvious pain you could hear the bones creak. And yet they still had their old chemistry, and it was really moving, the way he touched her cheek and snuggled with her."

So many people seemed to know Rock Hudson was gay, and yet it was a secret. How about his mother? Did she know?

Davidson grinned. "There's a great story about that. His mother was a devoted bridge player. One day down in Newport Beach, she was playing bridge, and one of her partners had something on her mind, and finally blurted out, 'I heard that Rock was gay!" His mother answered, "I know. And the hardest thing is, I can't remember his boyfriends' names. Three no trump.' "
 
 




 
 

 
 

 

Share/Bookmark




6 Comments

I've gotta tell this joke I read in "Army Laffs" magazine in 1961, which I snuck from a gas station counter when no one was looking. Yup, 1961.

"Two gay blades were watching a voluptuous woman strutting her obvious qualities down Hollywood Boulevard.

"As she passed by the two gentlemen, one turned to the other jealously and said 'Who does she think she is, Rock Hudson?'"

That was in Ohio. So I guess more people knew than the papers said.

Sarah Davidson's book sounds good! Nice post, Roger.

I wonder ......in a world of cinema and actors in 100 years from now, 2110 AD -- or 200 years.....2210 AD.......will America still be hung up in old attitudes about male and female sexuality? I wonder....

I just recently watched Seconds again. Seeing that made me sad and somehow angry that Rock Hudson's biggest secret might have been that he was a near-virtuoso actor whose skill was so often trapped in inferior material and in his own real-life role playing.

R.E. wrote: "In your book ... you write about a trip Hudson made to San Francisco, where he and a friend went sight-seeing in some of the wilder gay leather bars. Is it possible that he engaged in sexual practices common in those bars, and got AIDS that way?" And later: "Did Hudson engage in some of the more bizarre gay sexual practices?"

So ... HIV transmission is the result of exotic sex play? I know you know better than this. Also, regarding "bizarre gay sexual practices," I don't know of any such that are unique to my team. You het folks get just as freaky, but y'all get a pass for it for the most part. When my more adventurous brethren do it, however, this is trumpeted as evidence of how "deviant" we are.

And ... what's with the lurid questions about how Rock Hudson liked his sex? What about Rock Hudson's life, illness, or death makes discussing his preferred sex play relevant? HIV can be transmitted by the most vanilla of sexual acts. And in most of the world, it is spread primarily via heterosexual sex. There is no cautionary tale here about how M/F sex is safer, or how sticking to vanilla sex acts means people don't need to be careful. Yep, there's one particular way to play that lends itself to sex between men, and it is particularly risky, but it is hardly exotic.

Sara Davidson's reply wasn't much better, though she aggrieved me in a different way.

"No. He wasn"t into S & M, for example. He was basically a very romantic man. He was like a woman; he'd run and tell his friends when he'd found someone new that he was in love with. He always believed there was one single right person for him, Mr. Right, and he was always looking for that person, and always finding him."

"He was like a woman." Great. Because certainly no real men want to find someone to fall in love with. Yes, it is unmanly, and in fact womanly, to feel emotion and to desire love and connection. Score one for our emotionally constipated macho male BS culture.

You gender conformists just don't get it. I can cry when Kevin Costner plays catch with his dad in "Field of Dreams" - or for that matter, when Ennis and Jack fight during their last trip in "Brokeback Mountain." Doesn't mean I'm "like a woman." And I can change the oil in my car and build a stone wall. Doesn't make me a man. All the abilities and emotions of human kind are available to all of us, not just one gender.

I know you are a friend to us Roger. Which is perhaps why I am even more disappointed when I see you write like this and entertain such replies unchallenged.

Jeebus. I got my panties all in a bunch, then realized you wrote this in 1986. I apologize, Roger.
In 1986, I was 25, and coming out as the AIDS [GRID] crisis was gathering steam. Hell, from the alarmist news reports and from all the fear I was channeling back then, even I thought that freaky gay sex was the vector. And for all the work and achievements of the women's movement, there has never been a comparable men's movement to emancipate us from our rigid gender roles and expectations. "Knowing" you from your more recent writing, I'm guessing you probably wouldn't have worded/written this in quite the same way now. I don't mean that in a condescending surely-you-see-the-error-of-your-ways manner. For all I really know, maybe you would have written exactly the same thing. Anyway, just wanted to cut you some slack. It was 1986 for f_ck's sake.

Ebert: I would have written it differently. I wasn't the soul of sophistication on the subject in 1986.

...there has never been a comparable men's movement to emancipate us from our rigid gender roles and expectations.

But there was; it was called "the Sixties". Maybe it wasn't perfect, but it was something so elemental that The Establishment (if you'll forgive me) has dedicated much energy to rolling it back over the last 35 years. In fact, they've had so much success that even putative cultural "liberals", especially gay men, generally seem to accept the old basic gender assumptions and expressions once again. So there's collusion on both sides. And then people wonder why things are the way they are.

In fewer words: In the same way that liberals have become pathologically jittery about being branded with the "hippie" tag, many gays react the same way to the "girly" tag.

Leave a comment

The Webby Awards
Person of the Year

Best Blog: Natl. Soc. of Newspaper Columnists

One of the year's best blogs -- Time

Last 12 months, 108 million views at RogerEbert.com.

Year's best blog: Am. Assn. of Sunday and Feature Editors

Roger Ebert

Roger Ebert
Ebert's latest books are "The Great Movies III," "Roger Ebert's Movie Yearbook 2010" and "The Pot and How to Use It." Volumes I and II of "The Great Movies" and "Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert" can also be ordered via the links in the right column of rogerebert.com.

About this Archive

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

yearbook 2011.jpg
Buy from Amazon.com
Buy from Barnes & Noble
Buy from Borders
___________________

greatmoviesiii.jpg
Buy from Amazon.com
Buy from Barnes & Noble
Buy from Borders
___________________

Tweet / Facebook

Share |

Pages

Twitter