Ebertfest in Exile II

"...a failure in every possible way except that I loved it."

I can't think of a better way to summarize "Joe vs. the Volcano." Reading people's comments over the years, I've found it to be a tremendously polarizing film -- lovers, haters and few in between. I've been in the former group since it was in its initial release.

I wonder: How would JVTV have been made only a few years later, when Tom Hanks had morphed into TOM HANKS? In 1990 (before even "A League of Their Own"), he was still "wacky" enough that someone thought a Muppet-looking, roaring (?!?) hammerhead shark had a place in the picture. Is the film's technical "failure" due in part to the disconnect between Shanley's deeply thought, carpe-diem script and the need to give audiences the Mr. Bachelor Party they'd come to expect?

Thi isn't the place for a big love letter to the movie, but a quick shout to Tom Duffield's art direction -- the subtle manipulation of color, especially in the city scenes early on, helped put Joe in a world of his own.

I'll end by quoting you again, Mr. E., this time from your original review: "...I realized a wondrous thing: I had not seen this movie before. Most movies, I have seen before. Most movies, you have seen before." Spot on. I hope you get well soon, and that JVTV finds a place in next year's Ebertfest.

I, too, love "Joe vs. the Volcano". It's a strange little film that has a lot of charm. It captures how I feel going into my daily 9 - 5 office job. (Don't tell my boss.) I was wondering, however, what movie rules it broke. Aside from the Jewish-Pacific islanders, and a main character with a "fatal" disease who's tricked into attempting ritual suicide, I saw nothing to offend the "Movie Gods".

Romance and Cigarettes was recently made available "On Demand" in my local cable area. I can't wait to see it!!

I suppose we have many people to thank for the "return" of the movie musical. Some point to Moulin Rouge, others to Chicago, others still to Dancer in the Dark. I'm just happy that I can enjoy new musical films. There is something to be said for musicals in this day and age - I usually enjoy most of them (and according to your reviews, you seem to enjoy most of them, also) - it's refreshing to see a film that isn't scared to be, well... fearless. There is a certain vulnerablility in producing a movie musical, I imagine. And I appreciate it. Even the lesser of the most recent crop of these films (The Producers, Rent, the Phantom of the Opera) still have merits I can appreciate and be entertained by - such as being different. And breaking "rules." The genre, almost by definition, seems to break rules just for being. So much so that when a genuinely beautful film such as Once comes along and creates a genre movie that transforms its genre's rubric to seem more "realistic," well... I almost garner a bit of resentment. I want to hate it for trying to appeal to the masses! I want my spontaneous musical numbers and mysterious-backing-orchestra-coming-from-nowehere!!! (Oh wait, Once does have this... gosh, I love that film.)

And then to have "regular" movies like Joe vs. the Volcano readily available for viewership consumption is a delightful treat. Thanks for all your wonderful reccomendations.

- Joseph (uber fan)

I thought I was the only person alive who loved this movie. It made me laugh and now I want to rush out and buy it on dvd. Everyone that I told about the movie thought I was nuts. So it goes, in the words of Kurt Vonnegut, so it goes. Thanks for this stroll down memory lane.
With my luck it will be like Enchanted April and unavailable on DVD...

Hi Roger,

I'm one of the few people I know who has a fondness for, or even remembers, Joe Versus the Volcano. I love the quirky film, warts and all. I always look forward to reading about your film festival so I'll know what movies I need to add to my Netflix queue. Hopefully I'll be able to make it up to the festival in person someday.

I've been following your health issues over the past few years. I'm sure it's hard to have so many setbacks. I know a little about those kind of problems and I wish you all the best. I hope you know that all your fans are wishing the best for you and your family. Keep up the writing! I love "hearing" your voice and views on matters film and non-film related.

- Amanda Fisher

Roger: I have been a fan of yours for years, and always look forward to reading your thoughtful reviews. I think that through them your fans have gotten not just an appreciation for the love and study of film, but also a glimpse into who you are.

However, it was not until your public battle with your recent health problems that we were able to definitely confirm what your writings had given us glimpses of - the depth and breadth of your dignity and intellect.

I will simply say this: the way you have refused to hide the physical effects of your health problems, and the brave and optimistic way uo have continued to work is an incredible inspiration to me. It confirms a lot of the best things we believe about the human spirit.

Thanks for the example. May God continue to richly bless you and your family.

Tony

I also love Joe vs The Volcano. It's just so odd. I'd love to see it at Ebertfest sometime.

I'm always trying to convince people of why Joe versus the Volcano is a good movie & they rarely understand. It's nice to have one of the most respected movie critics on my side.

"Joe vs. the Volcano" is one of my top ten all-time favorite movies. I love the audacity of the plot, the implied threat to off the star, the cheesiness of the effects, the charm of the leads, the great little turns by Dan Hedaya, Ossie Davis and Barry McGovern...and most of all, I love the extraordinary score.

There are moments of truly earned emotion throughout: Joe Bank's lonely night in LA and his delirium as the enormous moon rises over the vast ocean...

It may not be the consistent artistic triumph of a Coen Brothers or Scorsese film, but it is a heart-grabber with its own peculiar mishmosh of styles...

HMH

Joe Versus the Volcano is my all-time favorite movie. And I've seen a lot of movies, and much of what's any good, from the silents to the most recent releases. It's just a charming movie. And very inspiring. Not perfect, obviously, but unique.

In fact just recently in a discussion about you on Emerson's blog I mentioned that I appreciated your having appreciated this movie. So I hope you do include it sometime in your festival, and it's heartening to read you still think highly of it. It's one of those that when people actually see it, many of them love it. Its IMDB review section consists of one person after another in love with the film and convinced he's the only one.

I agree with you, up to a point. Joe versus the Volcano is two thirds of a brilliant comedy but even a charter member of the "What ever happened to John Patrick Shanley Club" has to admit the third act is a total mess. The only redeeming part of the third act is the final lines "...and wherever we go, we're taking this luggage". All the versions of Meg Ryan were adorable and Tom Hanks was, typically, understatedly brilliant. The opening credit sequence and the first ten minutes in the "office" does a wonderful job of capturing the soul-destroying effect of a dead-end job. (he can get the job, but can he do the job).
After the promise of the first two acts the unravelling of the movie was so disappointing, leaving "The In Laws" (the original of course) safely on the pedestal as my all-time favourite comedy (spoken word at least - Buster Keaton remains the Stone Faced God of Comedy)

Thank you for making one of my guilty pleasures not so guilty. Joe vs. The Volcano has always been one of my favorite films. To me it contains the same crazy, kinetic energy of a Tex Avery cartoon.

Joe vs the Volcano is one of my all time favorite movies! Get well soon!!

I love "Joe Vs. the Volcano", and I can't seem to convince anyone else of its merits. For me, it exists outside the realm of criticism, and it just works on its own terms. Thank you for validating me!! At least now I know I'm not the only one...

"Joe Versus the Volcano" is, by all means, the most delightful misfire a studio ever dared to release. Or maybe, as the saying goes, "it wasn't released, it escaped!" The plot makes "Bubba Ho-Tep" seem like a biopic, it has easily two of Meg Ryan's worst performances ever and the climax is contrived at best.

Still, I remember few films from when I was a kid which have left as many fond movie memories as "Joe" has. The moon scene. The trunks. Abe Vigoda's Waponi Chief. The volcano path symbols throughout. And Tom Hanks at the center of it all in his best pre-"Philadelphia" performance.

I hope you do get around to booking "Joe" in your EbertFest. I hope I'm there to watch it. Most of all, I wish you're there with us then to help us appreciate it as only you can.

Be well, sir.

Get better soon, Roger!

All I remember about Joe vs. the Volcano is that being fed to the Volcano would have been preferable to working in his grungy office.

Sounds like it would be a fun choice for EbertFest, meaning it would be fun to argue whether or not it is worthy. After all, that's one of the most important qualities of any EbertFest movie - that it provide good argument fodder.

When I first saw "Yes" in a film study class, I found it very interesting and inspirational, to say the least. Unfortunately, this class only lasted for a little under an hour and was only held twice a week. I think it's almost criminal to not see a film all the way through the first time. This has been my number one rule for viewing films since some time around the Fall (before then, I saw some of what are now my favorite films broken up, yet that didn't seem to take away from their effect on me). We never finished "Yes" in class, but a rented it a while later and finished it. Off of memory, I believe that it is one of the best, most innovative films that I've ever seen. I know that I'll see it again some day and find a miriad of meaning in it that alluded me before.

Get well soon,
Matt

I have been a fan of 'Joe Vs the Volcano' since I was about 12. I always thought it was the type of movie lost on people that have spent so many years critiquing something that they have stripped away their ability to sit back and enjoy a simpler example of what they criticize. It's good acting and funny-true dialogue. In short, I just have always enjoyed watching it. It never gets old.

I avoided Joe vs. the Volcano for a long time because both of my parents told me it was the worst movie they'd ever seen (I don't think they even made it all the way to the end). Years later I suddenly realized that since my parents hated nearly all of my favorite movies, I'd probably do well to see this Volcano thing. Sure enough, it became another of my favorite movies. Oscars and critical praise nonwithstanding, Tom Hanks has never topped his work here. He's effortlessly funny and endearing throughout (or at least he makes it look effortless), and the "Dear God, whose name I do not know..." scene is just sublime.

I love Joe Versus the Volcano as if it were my own son, and I think the world needs John Patrick Shanley now more than ever.

Another fan of "Joe Versus the Volcano" here. As you say in your review, Shanley doesn't quite know what to do with the island natives, but Abe Vagoda as the chief and the tribe's love of orange soda still cracks me up. And the last lines of the movie:
"I wonder where we'll end up?"
"Away from the things of man, my love. Away from the things of man."
Indeed.

Speedy recovery to you, Mr. Ebert.

Roger,

Welcome to the blogging community! It is an extraordinary treat to read your insights and thoughts this way, as opposed to via a formal review. It also gives me a chance to add my voice to the chorus of acclaim here.

I consider myself lucky to have joined your readership when I was still young enough to learn something new. My movie-viewing tastes have evolved significantly over the years, to which I credit your reviews in no small part. Your thoughtful, wise, wry, and sometimes hilariously-biting reviews showed me a different way of watching and thinking about movies.

I hope that this next phase of your recovery goes swiftly. Go in health and happiness.

Oh, and by the way: I, too, love "Joe..." unreservedly.

Glad to hear you are on the mend! I am kicking myself that I never got to Ebertfest before I had kids, although I often Netflix the selections so I suppose am there in spirit.

I'm sure you don't remember me; I was one of the compuserve regulars back in the day. I am so pleased to see you blog, it's a little bit like old times. I'm trying to think of good book recommendations to pass the time while you are stuck in bed. I think you might find mine amusing, although for true silliness with plenty of visuals I think you might enjoy I Like You: Hospitality Under The Influence, by Amy Sedaris, it's like Betty Crocker on acid!

I hope you get better soon. You're my favorite movie reviewer; actually the only movie reviewer I really ever cared about and checked often. And not because we always agree (your gushing over Juno, for example, was a bit perplexing), but because I always could appreciate what you appreciated in a film. And because you seem like a really nice decent guy, with obvious intelligence that never comes off snotty, and your class, courage and fortitude in facing your troubles makes me admire you all the more.

Thanks for mentioning this film. I've added it to my Netflix queue.

So sorry to hear about your hip, after all your other medical travails.

I don't feel alone anymore!!!! I saw Joe in the movie theater when I was 12 or 13. (I had the choice of Hunt for Red October or Joe. I chose Joe). I thought it was funny then, and have seen it many many times since, and find something new to love about it everytime. Ossie Davis is wonderful, Abe Vigoda is fantastic. As absurd as that movie is, it is brilliant in its absurdity.

I do not understand why people must qualify their love of Joe Vs. the Volcano by saying things like "the studio messed it up"or "its not perfect." re-watch the movie! the path to the factory, the lightening bolt and the "crooked road" joe took to meet his love all have something in common. And the best of all is the song marooned without you--lyrics by the brilliant shanley. So utterly romantic--unashamedly, unabashedly so. It is a movie that does not apologize for what it is with cynicism. It instead eschews cynicism and goes headlong into what it wants to be and that is where the charm comes from. Like that dorky kid who you just liked hanging out with in high school because he had the guts to be who he was and is probably a cool artist somewhere now.

Again, another "Joe" fan here -- I remember watching it in this dumpy theater in South Carolina and thinking, and I the only one here who "gets" this film? The moon scene was fabulous and Tom Hanks and Dan Hedeya are terrific in those early scenes. I'm glad there are more fans out there. It's one of my favorite guilty pleasure movies.

Get well Roger, you are much appreciated out here in Audienceland.

Hi Roger-

I love Joe Vs. The Volcano- and imagine it would be hard to choose which one of the movies from this year to cut out in order to put that one in. It's been a great variety so far! Talk about a movie breaking the rules- Farmer John is something else! If only there were more people like him in the world. What a delightful guy with a delightful mother.

By the way- Chaz is doing a great job of keeping us informed and laughing- as well as making us feel right at home. You'd be so proud (and I'm sure you are)!

Keep getting better, Roger! We're wishing you the best!

Joe vs. the Volcano would fall into that "Big Stars/No Box Office" category of Overlookedness. It's a good comfort film, like Planes, Trains and Automobiles, along with one of my other favs from that period, Other People's Money, a movie that I seem to watch a couple of times every year.

Those could also be called "I Wanna Hug Myself After" movies.

Jason,
Toronto

I'm an American who raised 3 kids in a small West African country, so we relied heavily on videos for entertainment. "Joe" was one of our favorites, and we recall portions from it to this day, from the life-sucking fluourescent lights to the trunks that wouldn't go away - we loved it all. (We also have a special place in our hearts for "Ishtar," - it's so delightfully bad - and we sang along....)

I've been a fan for years, but it puts a smile on my fact to know that you enjoyed "Joe." Best wishes for your recovery.

I love this movie, and have since I first saw it in the theatre. It gets everything right, from the wry opening sequence of crushed souls shambling to their places in the factory, to that magnificently transcendent moment on the raft when Joe's "heart swells and bursts" with joy and wonder, just as he had hoped it one day would. What other movie so effectively captures the unfolding of a human heart and soul? Wow!

Joe Vs. The Volcano deserves legendary status for the "Come Go With Me" sequence alone :-)

Yet, it has even more virtues from Ozzie Davis' wonderful supporting performance to Meg Ryan's delightful multiple roles ("would you like to hear one of my poems?").

How can anyone not love a movie with orange soda as a plot point?!

Hang in there, brother and hopefully I'll be able to make my Ebertfest debut next year to coincide with your return...

Jeffrey

I LOVED this movie ever since the first time I rented it back in the old old days of VHS rental.

Illegally made a copy for myself and watched it at LEAST once a week for the next SEVERAL years.

I can quote almost the entire movie verbatim.

Finally got a copy on DVD, it all it's true glory (my VHS copy was so worn out I could barely see it).

Personally wondered why Joe never went for a sceond opinion - a BRAIN CLOUD?.

Underrated film, stellar cast, funny - "Once upon a time there was a guy named Joe who had a very lousy job…"

This ranks up there with other forgotten gems I proudly own - Moon Over Parador, the ABC TV Movies of the Week "Bad Ronald" and "Buster & Billie," Cold Turkey, Heartbeeps (yeah, I said it!), my OOP DVD of The Best of Ernie Kovacs, my recently acquired Criterion copy of "Videodrome" - and many many more...

I love film and have been fortunate enough to find quite a few "Holy Grails" here and there...

Glad to see your love of film is still as powerful as ever, Roger!

"Long ago, the delicate tangles of his hair... covered the emptiness of my hand... Would you like to hear it again?"

I avoided "Joe vs. the Volcano" in theaters because of the outcry against it from critics. When I met my wife, she was a big fan. She got me to sit down and watch it, and I loved it so much I nabbed a copy on DVD as soon as it came out. There is nothing more I would want from you than to have you finally program it for Ebertfest next year, so my wife would finally return with me. We cam to the 4th, 5th and 6th Ebertfests and I am here alone this year. If "Joe" played I know my wife would come back despite time or money or whatever we have going. Shes missing so many great movies this year. You have scheduled one of you best. The screening of "Hulk" this morning even convinced me my initial review was wrong. You can read about it in my blog tomorrow.

Hey Mr. Ebert,

I just wanted to let you know that I check your blog every day in hopes that you have posted something new. You are a big reason I love watching and studying films. Thank you for everything.

-Chase

Get well Roger be comforted by the thought of thousands of people wishing you the best on your recovery.

Our own relationship got off to a rocky start when you sent me (and hundreds of others) off to Mandel Hall at the U of Chicago on a very cold night in 1968 to see a one night showing of Godard's "sympathy for the devil" (rave 4 star review as I recall). All was forgiven long ago. And after all, it was a memorable night.

Roger, I've been reading you online for about 8 years but have been watching you on TV since I was a kid. I wish you all the best, and thanks for being a friend to so many of us, even if we never actually meet.

Wow! I just drove back to Louisville from two wonderful days at Ebertfest at which, during downtimes, I fantasized about your presenting Joe Vs. the Volcano sometime.... I kid you not, it's one of my favorite movies ever. I also fantasized about Enchanted April... criminally, never released on DVD. (Housekeeping still hasn't appeared on DVD either, and nobody thought to ask about it.)

Wow! There are other people on this planet that appreciate Joe Versus the Volcano! This is one of the most meaningful movies I've seen, and, like Casablanca, a movie I can see over and over again with pleasure.

I once recommended it to a friend who saw it and hated it because Joe was spit out of the volcano and they felt that was too unrealistic. Told me something about my friend right there that they could not get the symbolism of the film. I think a lot of the folks who hate this film are viewing it through literal eyes.

I love the crazy path to the top that matches the shape of the lightning and matches the shape of the walkway to work at the beginning of the film. I love Meg Ryan as she grows more real with each incarnation. I've never seen her more beautiful than when she is on the ship and telling Joe about her soulsickness.

And my wife and I have ever since looked at each other and said, "It's always going to be something with you, isn't it?"

Thank you so much for recognizing this film, the best Hanks/Ryan partnership they ever made (in my opinion), and yet the one that no one remembers any more.

Roger:

With the exception of your absence, this year's Ebertfest was the best EVER!!!

Chaz was a tireless & gracious host. I think she did and said everything you asked her to. *wink*

Perhaps Tom Hanks would come to C-U to represent "Joe vs. the volcano" since his brother is a professor at the University of Illinois. Hmmm?

By the way, Richard Corliss and Michael Barker did a fantastic job moderating panels. I enjoyed their humor in addition to their knowledge.

Thank you to you, Nate Kohn, and Mary Susan Britt for another wonderful festival.

I LOVE EBERTFEST!

Sending positive energy your way, Roger.

See you next year in Champaign-Urbana.

"I'm not arguing that with you!"

I still have Dan Hedaya's incessant loop of a phone conversation in my head. "I'm not arguing that with you! I'm not arguing that with you! I know he can get the job, but can he do the job?"

I can't even remember the last time I saw the film, but it's still there.

Ah, Joe vs. the Volcano, one of my favorite films! I'm sorry you didn't get a chance to screen it when I lived in Urbana, and could attend Ebertfest!

A quick question, if you might respond to comments... I lived for 5 years around the corner from that E. Washington house, on Maple St. Across Maple St. was a house with "The Eberts" hung over the front door. Relatives?

Best of luck with healing!

I'm afraid I must respectfully disagree with Mr. Ebert and others about _Joe vs. the Volcano_. I've often heard this film praised, so I finally watched it a few months ago. Here's the problem [Spoilers ahead!]:

The film made me sad. Because I can see how it might appeal to people stuck in the sort of deadening jobs the film evokes in its office/industrial set design, offering people stuck in lousy jobs an enchanting fantasy of magic and escape (two things that I have nothing against!).

Yet this film is always too pat by half, in its sending up of office life, and in fact its final moment of "escape" is probably the most depressing ending of a film this side of _Brazil_, at least.

Hanks and Ryan have enjoyed a magnificent trip, but he now stands with his newfound love at the brink of a volcano, bound by his promise to complete his contractual duty by throwing his own body into the volcano. Ryan has elected to follow him. Together they face a choice: to continue living, and enjoy their new love, or to fulfill Hank's promise to the boss who won Hanks's promise to jump into the volcano by tricking him into believing he had a terminal illness.

Faced with a choice between their new love, and their obligation to the inhuman corporation, Hanks and Ryan give up on life for the sake of the corporation, and both jump to their deaths! Or try to, anyhow--they're saved by a miraculous gust of wind.

A tragic failure on their part, but sadder for those who watch and empathize with these characters, learning to adore a film that teaches that work may suck, but that our fate must be to submit fully to it, even to the point of death. As such, it's a film that extols a sad defeatism in the face of the misery of the workplace, and that praises working people for quietly accepting their fates, rather than challenging them, organizing, or otherwise changing the conditions of their own lives.

When the Boss says, "Jump!," this film tells us, we shouldn't just ask "How high?," but also: "How far down into the pit?"

I first stumbled upon Roger Ebert while on a trip to Chicago in the Seventies -- both in print as well as on a local PBS show with Gene Siskel. Then, lo and behold, there were Siskel & Ebert on PBS in South Carolina, of all places. I had just taken several film classes (all two or three that were offered) at USC, one originally as an elective for grad school and the others because I became fascinated by seeing that I was not the only one who loved films as films. A huge advantage for a film-lover in Columbia, SC, during the Sixties was the existence of the Five Points Theatre, not far from the university. It was owned by a wonderfully eccentric lady with an eclectic taste in movies. It was interesting to see movies show up for screening that we read about in the New Yorker or other magazines.

Then, she died and the relatives closed the theater. I was away serving in Viet-Nam and then other places. It was a palatable void in my life. However, Bennie Dunlap and others at USC picked up some of the slack and so did ETV -- for a time.

Which brings me to "Joe Versus the Volcano." I, too, saw it in a South Carolina theater and had the distinct feeling that I may have been the only person to enjoy it. I had made a point to see because Roger Ebert recommended it. I recently watched the DVD and still found it an enjoyable, off-beat -- in the finest sense of that word -- film. Yes, it is a mess in places, but then, so what?

I once mentioned that I not liked, but admired JVTV during a discussion on movies. It was as if a cockroach had suddenly been discovered in the potato salad at the company picnic or that it wasn't a Baby Ruth floating in the punchbowl at the senior prom. The reactions to my admission to not only liking, but enjoying, JVTV were, well, the terms "visceral" and "blistering" come close. However, I was -- and am -- unfazed by it because, as Roger pointed out, it was a movie I had never seen before, one that is as far away as one could get from being a "formula" movie. It would have played to a packed audience at the Five Points Theatre....

Roger; For more years than I recall your reviews on the Suntimes web site have been my Friday ritual. You helped me and my daughter Meg, appreciate and look at movies from a fresh perspective. Through the wonderful PBS years with Gene and onward to network syndication and in your books, we have enjoyed and grown from your insight, humour and intelligent narrative. I made a trip to Chicago on business two years and fell in love with the city and can see why you would too. Keep on keepin on. Our thoughts and prayers are with you in your inspirational journey of recovery !

I'm not arguing that with you.

I'm NOT ARGUING THAT with you.

I'M NOT ARGUING THAT WITH YOU!

I completely agree about Joe Versus the Volcano...the first half looks awful in that dreary blue tint, almost as awful as a few offices I worked in. And second half really doesn't work. So why was I smiling when it was done? I keep trying t recommend it to people, but too often they'll ask for specifics. Intangibles defy description. I am glad you mentioned it. I will dig out the tape.

Mr. Ebert -

This is why I love you! I have always liked Joe vs. Volcano but couldn't quite put my finger on what was so damn likeable about it.

You put articulately put into words things I just nebulously *feel* about the movies.

With gratitude,
- WisePig

The thing that I love most about JVTV is the "BRAIN CLOUD"
I had to undergo Chemo 12 years ago and one of the side effects is affectionately, or not,
referred to as 'Chemo Brain'.
I always thought that Brain Cloud was a much better term as it described the problem very well.
However whenever I mentioned the Brain Cloud, I had to explain the whole 'Joe vs The Volcano' movie, NOBODY that I knew had seen it! Their loss!

The earliest memory I have of you is an old, old episode of Sneak Previews, where one of the movies you and Gene Siskel reviewed was The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith (a movie I've ALWAYS wanted to see, ever since, but which is next to impossible to track down). As others have said, your movie criticism has shaped me as a filmgoer and more often than not, I find myself in complete agreement with you (love your review of the Coen brothers' Fargo; not so sure about your rave for Spawn). I've always loved Joe vs. The Volcano, for its quirky humor and gentle humanity. Hope you continue to do well and get better and that you're around to provide us your filmgoing insights for a long time to come.

Thanks,

Craig

I watched Yes on the basis of your initial review, and was deeply rewarded. It is a beautiful movie, spiritual and surreal. As usual, you prove that, if you love movies enough not only to feel but to think deeply about them, you can share that love with others, and embolden them to "look over" the overlooked. Thanks again. And of course, get well posthaste!

I am so sorry about your medical problems. But please keep writing. You write so perceptively, so beautifully, and with such wit and grace and sensitivity, you are a true National Treasure. God love you, Mr. Ebert. We do. And then some.

Mark, that was a very interesting dissenting view of JVTV. I see your point, and yet the message I get from the movie is not that we should subject ourselves to our corporate masters. Just the opposite, actually. The reason Joe jumps is because he is about to die anyway (he thinks) so at least he can go out this way instead of waiting for death to overtake him. He keeps his word and does something that will benefit the islanders. Helping the corporate owner is the last thing on his mind at that point.

The meta reason for his jumping, of course, is to illustrate the need to sometimes just take a leap of faith because you just never know.

All of this tells the viewer to absolutely GET AWAY from soul-sucking jobs and get into whatever can make life real for you.

Get well soon, Roger! I cannot tell you the happiness I feel to know you are blogging. You're a national treasure.

I count myself among the many who keep this movie in the "guilty pleasure" cabinet.

Every time during this movie I said to myself, "oh, and from here they're doing THIS," I was wrong. I was sure the limo driver would become the film's ongoing Comedy Sidekick. I was sure first Meg Ryan would go with him, then the second one, and then by the third one I finally caught on. I was sure the yacht crew would show up again. And again and again I guessed wrong, and every time when I would have (in another movie) said "that's wrong, I know how the story goes" I just kind of stuck with it. And as a viewer I was increasingly feeling like I was in the raft sequence: unsteady, totally lost at sea... and yet instead of giving up on the whole idea I just said "oh, why not?"

And that's when the moon rises.

I think that's what the film's ultimately "about", if anything. When you're lost in the middle of the sea or in the middle of an unfulfilling life, sometimes you just have to let go and say "why not?"

Best wishes for continued recovery, Mr. Ebert.

I remember being surprised and then pleased with "Joe Versus the Volcano" when I first saw it on TV - the worst way to experience a movie in my opinion. But the movie overcame the commercial interruptions and I've never forgotten it. Years later on DVD I still enjoy it.

"Yes" is one of my favorites as well (as is Potter's previous film "Orlando"). You'd have to survive to the end to get it's full effect so hopefully no one will see it unfinished. I'm so happy you like Yes too - almost nobody I know has heard of it.

Count me in the "me too" Joe vs Volcano lovers. I found it to be deeply funny and not too ironic social commentary about what we, as a society, are willing to endure in return for a pittance that will probably not be paid until well after the work kills us too much to enjoy it.

Not only that but, it ha a fantastic soundtrack. A long time ago when I worked in a video store, I would out it on the monitors daily, because it was fun to listen to.

Thanks so much for the validation.

I have never seen JVTV, but I will surely check it out after reading this. I must have missed your initial review of the movie back when it came out. I have been a mostly faithful viewer and reader ever since the days of Sneak Previews on WTTW with yourself and Gene when I was in grade school. To say I enjoyed watching you & Gene discuss and at times spar over films would be an understatement.

It is great to see you continue writing when time allows. Of course the show is no longer the same, but I will continue to support and view it. As a big fan, I would like to take this opportunity to personally thank you for all the years of great writing and television you have provided for myself and many others. Best wishes and get well soon, Mr. Ebert.

- Jim

Welcome to blogging, Roger!

I hope you feel better.

It's good to see you blogging, although I can't wait to read some new reviews, same as everyone here. i love how you dismantle films with such tenderness, you really bring a depth to the craft of criticism. I don't always agree with you, but I ALWAYS see something that I hadn't noticed before, and I appreciate that more than I can say.

Oh, and Joe Vs. the Volcano seriously rocks.

I remember watching Entertainment tonight's report on the making of the movie. The scene which was shown was of the sailboat during that big storm. I thought at the time that it looked interesting, and then the movie came out and my earlier opinion was proven correct. I never understood why the movie was a failure. It had 2 very likable stars, a nice love story, some comedy, and some truly amazing photography. The scene with the rising moon still gives me shiver today.

The only time that I've ever wanted to golf...

I don't believe this. I really thought that I was the only person who absolutely loves "Joe." Saw it in '90 at a long-gone drive-in with my wife (who hated it...and is now also long-gone), bought the DVD when it came out, watch it annually, and have lived my life by Joe's teachings ever since: when in trouble, plead "brain cloud," if given a choice between work you hate and into-the-volcano...pick the volcano (or freedom), and above all - learn to love orange soda. Anyway...Roger, please get better!

Every year or so, my family gets together to watch Joe vs. the Volcano on measly VHS. It's a movie, we all agree, that's so terrible that we must love it.

Still, it's a beautiful, tightly packaged, narratively perfect film.

In an imperfect, ugly, forbidden movie law breaking way.

Thank you for a *great* selection of films at this years Ebertfest. I agree about both "Yes" and "Romance & Cigarettes" -- full of energy and intelligence and the exuberance of being alive, threatening in the same way that teenagers are threatening to adults. But more than that: all the style and art is in service of a story about the redemptive power of love and lust. They were far and away my favorites of the festival, leaving me crying with joy.

I have shown JVTV to at least two dozen people and so far one person besides me likes it! Thank you all. Now I know that I am not alone in the world.

When I first saw this film on HBO I started telling people how odd and wonderful it was. "I'll never trust you again," was as I recall the most common reply. The beginning and ending, especially the ending, were what people seemed to hate the most.

It's hard to defend the Waponi Tribe other than the fact that they fit perfectly into the film's universe it's a joke that goes on far too long. Then again if your spiritual awakening is set into motion by Dan Hedaya you get what you deserve in such matters.

In the course of taking his final action in the film Joe proves he is the better person than Graynamore or near anyone in the movie. He is true and honest to his word thus rewarded for it by the Gods. Anyone who thinks that the urge to buy waterproof steamer trunks isn't being directed by the Hand of Fate needs to reconsider their spiritual outlook. Should your boat sink you won't really need your loafers.

I just wanted to add (and it's difficult to articulate this) that the tendency of even the fans of it (posting here) to sort of apologize for it, or say it's all silliness, or otherwise treat it as a sort of lovable loser production, or a guilty pleasure- it's unfortunate. As you Roger have written, film is an emotional medium, and this film is a masterpiece of emotion, and funny when it means to be funny (excepting the natives), and it's romantic and not cynical- and I think this results in people thinking it's not that bright. In fact the screenplay for this, and the little touches throughout, are very, very bright. It's almost entirely symbolic, in fact (which is why so much of it doesn't work for some people, who take it at face value). According to Shanley, the entire office setting, and those scenes, represent the inside of Joe's head. And there have been good arguments made for Joe's progression being based on Kierkegaard (ending with the 'leap of faith' into the volcano). The lightning bolt design (seen on the way to the office, to the volcano, and in the lightning that strikes the boat), Meg Ryan's three types, Joe throwing out hats, the 'luggage' that ends up always saving his life- this is all meaningful, besides being interesting. Obviously film is an emotional medium so it doesn't matter that all this is in there- but its being in there is a sign that fans of the film shouldn't be apologizing for liking it. It's smarter and richer than the vast majority of films out there. It works on every level (except for the Waponis, which is just a bad joke done badly, but which ultimately doesn't hurt the film very much) once the viewer understands the sort of film he's watching. This remains the only film in its genre.

When Joe vs the Volcano was in theaters my husband and I were friends with a nice vegetarian guy and his not-so-nice girlfriend. One night we decided to see a movie together. The girlfriend wanted to see a foreign film (I think it was Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown). I didn't feel up to a foreign movie, and suggested Joe vs the Volcano. My husband and Drew's boyfriend agreed with me.

We saw Joe vs the Volcano. I liked it, but didn't admit it to anyone afterwards. The girlfriend hated it.

I think that was our last outing with the vegetarian and his girlfriend and were happy when they broke up. We are still friends with the vegetarian.

(To be fair to the girlfriend -- if it were today, I would have chosen the foreign film over the light Hollywood comedy.)

"What's that?" "It is my soul..." "I hope you don't loose it."

Colorful people with a love for orange soda.... a love for the embelishment and the adornments of life. But the downfall of this society is alowing their own fear to get the better of them. In that moment of weakness they sell their souls to capitalists who have little regard for them or their culture. Manipulating men who would take all the Waponi have without a second thought.

Maybe we as Americans, who decorate our lives with absurdities and our love of excesses should have learned from the Waponi.

Don't be afraid of the unknown and scarry. "You know what you're afraid of. Why don't you just do it?"

Dear Roger,

If I were to try to thank you for all of Ebertfest, words wouldn't get me there. I was sorry not to have the opportunity to try this year because in person you might sense my gratitude even after hearing what would sound the same as you've heard from hundreds of others.

I was happy to read your post singling out "Yes" and "Romance and Cigarettes" as they were my favorites of the week, both running through my head for the next many hours, prodding me to view them again soon to soak up more of their wise optimism. So now I know I'll give Joe/Volcano a shot: Could it possibly compare? I think I should wait for the imminent big screen experience and some expert guests to show me what I might not appreciate otherwise. We trust you.

And as for Ebertfest on the whole: I'm surely not the only one whose spirits are bouyed as we crawl out of the annual gloom of C-U winter knowing that with spring will surely arrive the warmth and sunshine of our favorite event. I love all the interdependent elements of this festival: The welcomed guests that we midwesterners gawk at, the celebrities (some genuinely in awe that they've came to a town called Champaign Illinois and truly enjoyed their stay; almost invariably charming us) and the young modest directors whose names we've never heard but whose works we'll watch for in the future like proud parents; the perfectly-selected films -- many of whose titles we literally tilt our heads at when the list first arrives and then wonder how we, professed film buffs, had overlooked so many; the Virginia, recovering bit-by-bit as recovery usually goes; the C-U regulars who feel the pride and ownership of this festival with you, all happy to see each other again in their favorite environment; newcomers who wonder one after the other why they didn't get here sooner but never find less than expected; Chaz, warmth defined, who inspires me with her sincerity, clearly inspired in turn by your love of film and our community; you've been here, you get the rest: It's not hyperbole.

So, until next year, when I'll hope again for the chance to meet you and express my appreciation and admiration, I wish you health, strength and joy. We missed seeing you but knew your heart was here and had a great time as always!

I was so surprised to have you single out this film as a favorite of yours. I must concur with the rest of the earlier comments and say I have found virtually no one else who has any love for this gem the way I do. It's faults only seem to make the sincere moments shine all the brighter. I'm sure the fact that I have been in a "Joe" job before- in no small part adds to my joy in watching this film. Always makes me smile. Not enough movies realize that sometimes that's all you have to do.

Wow. Other people who loved this movie, which holds a special place in my heart.

"I don't have a response for that."

So this guy is floating in the middle of the ocean on a raft and he's got nothing but himself and the sea for miles around. What does he do? He breaks into a dance number. And at that moment, I fell in love with Joe Versus The Volcano. I have remained a fan ever since. Good call, Roger.

@Mark 27 April:

Thank you for your well-thought and well-expressed, seemingly lone dissent. It definitely beats the majority of JVTV haters, who cannot express at all why it did not speak to them as it has to so many others.

I would just like to ask you to look at the title once more: it's not 'Joe AND The Volcano', nor is it 'Joe WITH the Volcano', it is 'Joe VERSUS The Volcano'.

As @Nick R. 28 April so deftly rebuts, Joe is not succumbing to the corporation, indeed, he is rebelling against it by embracing his integrity, faith and new found love of life.

However, and more importantly, (and I admit it's been a few years since I've seen it in full), Joe and Patricia are not merely randomly blown out by "a gust of wind" the Volcano ("God... whose name I do not know...") both accepts and *rewards* Joe's sacrifice by refusing his life, and it is the Volcano in its act of exploding that throws Joe and Patricia to the safety of the sea where it had planned for their (expected) salvation with the luggage from the very beginning.

Joe's struggle is not with a mundane life thrust upon him, Joe is struggling against his own fear of living; moreover, Joe is struggling with himself; Joe, or Joe's fear, *IS* the Volcano. And God. And Life.

And even if I'm wrong, and you're right, the movie is just plain funny and meaningful. All of it. I swear it is a rare day that passes that I do not quote it in everyday conversation, even if silently to myself.

And even if it's not funny, or meaningful, it still touched my soul. And, ultimately, that's all that matters. To me, Anyway. I'm not arguing that with you.

Kind Regards

Rico

I just watched this film again and I couldn't agree more with Mr. Ebert's review. Hardly flawless, but maybe the flaws make it more idiosyncratic and I think more endearing. It a beautiful film with wonderful symbols throughout and dialogue with real gravity. That's slightly jovial but also (deadly) serious...it's a kind of magic really to sustain that tone almost throughout the entire film. So lovely! I think I'll watch it again and learn another lesson from it. And how perfectly does Ossie Davis nail his role? Pretty perfectly I'd say.

My #1 favorite movie of all time...

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Joe_Versus_the_Volcano

Joe has been one of my favorite films for years. Like you Roger, I felt there was something undefinable about the film, and I found myself curiously drawn to it time after time. Unfortunately, I never saw it on the theater screen and only saw the pan-scan, full screen cut during its peak cable run.

I recently found the dvd for about two bucks at the supermarket and watched it in all its cinema-splendor. Until now, I was unable to appreciate the color palate and cinematography, both of which are outstanding.

Although the script seems to jump around like a scratched record, the prosaic dialogue really hits at times like only a handful of films out there. Look carefully for the many undercurrents of themes behind the main one of Joe's reawakening and appreciation of life. Especially, note how the Meg Ryan characters act as Joe's spiritual guides. It's all very interesting, and Joe devoded websites find ties to religious, philosophical, and mythological themes (even the characters names seem to be carefully chosen in this regard).

One last thing, the main theme song, Marooned Without You, is a beautiful composition, which was penned by the writer/director.

You loved Joe vs the Volcano? I never would have guessed that in a million years, but I loved hearing that. I'm going to have to rent it now. As always, thank you for sharing with us.

In my opinion, JvtV is misunderstood because people think it's a romantic comedy.

It's really a fairy tale told with a pre-Vietnam, perhaps even pre-WWII sense of optimism and hope. Most people I know can't let go of their sense of cynicism long enough to realize that Joe's journey from fear to love has to culminate in that final leap of faith. The experience isn't supposed to make sense.

It's that acceptance of fate and uncertainty, that earnest sense that Joe and Patricia will always rise to the top as long as they take creative risks, that drives the movie.

It certainly helps that the dialogue is so sharp and Hanks balances the twin concerns of symbolic journey and goofball physical comedy so well.

All in all it made me think of earnest movies of the 1930s; You Can't Take It With You or Meet John Doe.

Know yourself. Take risks. Fall in love. Ask for advice. Think ahead when you can. Buy practical. Be loyal. Jump in. Enjoy the beauty all around us every moment.

I have a dear friend from high school (I'm pushing 50) who hipped me to JvtV when it was very new, and I find it to be brilliant in the same way that The Big Lebowski and The In-Laws (the Falk/Arkin original, please) were. Imperfect, but audacious, and entirely confident of the universe they were creating and the mode of storytelling that was in play.

I don't go a day without saying either, "I'm not arguing that with you," "you're being very un-Dude," or, "serpentine!"

Mr. Ebert, I wish you the best of health and continued productivity. I admire your embrace of new amd different avenues of communication given your current circumstances. We are truly blessed to have your voice among us. Continued recovery to you, sir.

Finally, someone else liked Joe vs. the Volcano!! I thought I was the only one. The studios did this one a disservice by selling it as a romantic comedy, when in fact, it contained social commentary and irony. I would hope that it will actually make the docket at Ebertfest some day.

I was just looking at the credits for the director of "Doubt" and realized that his only other directorial credit is for "Joe vs. the Volcano." I'm curious to know if his success with this new film somehow helps you feel validated in liking "Joe vs. the Volcano." I realize he was already an Oscar winner but it seems like when a director comes up with a well-received movie, all of his or her former work is looked at again with a different light.

I watched Joe with a number of friends at University many times in the late 1980's. It touched something in us. Ironically, I was studying philosophy at the time but didn't identify the strong existential overtones of the film. There are so many quotable lines from the film - I have found myself quoting them, mainly to myself, often through the years since. One that comes to mind that I haven't seen mentioned above is Joe's comments to Marshall just before he is dropped off at the Pierre Hotel where he says "some things in life you just gotta go through alone" or something like that. The existential profoundness, maturity and courage of that line at that point in Joe's "development" has inspired me to do many things in my own life to date that I feel have been my best achievements.

Thank you all for sharing your passion for Joe, and of course yourself, Mr. Ebert.

I love JVTV. I love the fact that everytime I watch it, it is like re-reading a great piece of literature, the symbolism and metaphors. I always wondered if everything was as intentional as I found them to be. For example, the light of the hula dancer and the moon reflecting Joe's spark of life. I have shared this movie with many friends and family member and have had many interesting and stimulating discussions about it's meanings and symbols. But it is also just a fun movie to watch.

Ebert: It will come into its own someday.

JVTV will always hold a special place in my heart. It's so diferent, so hard to describe, that when people ask me what kind of movie it is, I always become silent for a moment, to think, then reply with "it's a fairy tale". I know of no other genre into which it can be put. A rare movie that keeps me smiling from beginning to end, and never fails to inspire. Get well, Mr. Ebert.

I can add my vote to being a big fan of the film, I suppose after reading the reviews above, my only thing to add is the same thing I experienced the other day watching "Wallace and Grommit" the Were-rabbit is that its completely absurd. The characters take the most serious and reasoned approach to the most contrived, unbelievable situations, and for that reason, it makes me laugh. Uncontrollably. Perhaps if the situations were realistic or the jokes were made funnier, it would be different. That shark thing alwayas gets a smile. They jump in the volcano, because.... uh, well that's my job. But, hey, that's life, all you can do is laugh and join along in the joke?

'The Cowboy Song' was the first song I ever played on stage. I usually steal the credit for it.

This movie was the first thing my wife and I had in common. I cannot imagine being married to someone that does not like this movie. Marraige therapist should ask all couples if one partner likes the movie and the other doesn't. Both have to be on the same side or the marraiges will fail.

Thanks to Mr. Ebert for putting into words the reasons why some people get it.

I just watched the DVD of Joe Versus the Volcano tonight... for about the 10th time. I've loved it ever since the very first time, and have incorporated its wisdom into my life all these years. The wonderful quotes from the movie often come up in my mind, and out of my mouth. Tonight I discovered this "discussion" and am thrilled that there are so many of us who feel the same way about this wonderfully odd little film. Thank you, Roger, for leading me here. I always read your reviews after watching my NetFlix DVDs, and enjoy your insightful comments. You're the best!

Roger, believe it or not, I viewed this movie today for the very first time at roughly the time that you wrote your opening blog. I just came across this blog while a few minutes ago when I was looking for original reviews of the movie including yours.

This is a movie that I had known about for years as though a big Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan fan, this particular movie never seem to interest me as the premise seemed riduculous and as the movie was a known flop, but I still figured I would one day finally sit down and watch for the hell of it. Well today I was home sick and it came on t.v. so I figure why not. As the movie opened it came across like sometime out of a Beetlejuice movie (but probably came out before it)and it seemed bleak and dismal and didn't seemed like the Tom Hanks I know and love. As my interest in the movie started to waning at the depressing tone, Hank's character pulled out a lamp with a tropic island and volcano on it which seemed like a ray of light and that really intriged me for some reason. I wanted to see where the movie was going to go from there and before I knew it I was hooked and watched the whole movie. I cannot really described what I was feeling as viewed the movie but when Joe finds out he is dying, which liberates him from bleak existence , I felt liberated or at the very least that I too have the power to liberate myself from the bleak elements in my life, thats its the power of the mind that frees us or enslaves us.

Without going further I essentially see this movie speaking on the human condition and how we ourselves are the masters of our own destiny, as long as we can liberate ourselves from mundane that threatens to rob our souls and leave us as mindless robots.

There is much more to this movie than meets the eye and I will be watching again a couple more times. Needless to say I love this and may actually be my favorite of the Hank/Ryan movies.

My goodness I have been ridiculed for my love of this movie more times than I can count! Reading your blog, Mr. Ebert, is always an uplifting experience, though this is the first time I've wanted to contribute (and it's only because of the thoughtfulness of the posts).

Anyone who's seen this a number of times--the religious connections are seeming more obvious as I read. A series of threes: The Meg Ryans, the appearances of the "crooked road" symbol (path to factory, lightening bolt, road up the volcano), the three miraculous appearances of the luggage (beam of light at the store, and two miraculous rescues.

Then there's the journey up a mountain to make a human sacrifice which reflects Abraham's journey to sacrifice his son--and Abraham is spared as well!

How long is the journey on the boat? six weeks. Easy connection: Noah and the ark. But there's also the fact that Joe was put on this solitary journey as death approached much the same journey that Jesus took in the desert where he made many of the same type of discoveries that Joe did on the boat.

I'm sure there are more (how old IS Joe anyway? Early 30's is a good guess I think considering nine years since he was a fireman. Could he have been 33 like Christ?)

Beyond that the movie is just lovely and my chest wells up every time I watch it. I agree with a previous poster when he admonished people for apologizing for the film and calling it a guilty pleasure. Guilty pleasures are bad for you, and this is a movie that is very, very good for you.

And hell, I happen to enjoy the wamponi! Abe Vigoda makes me laugh. =)

My goodness I have been ridiculed for my love of this movie more times than I can count! Reading your blog, Mr. Ebert, is always an uplifting experience, though this is the first time I've wanted to contribute (and it's only because of the thoughtfulness of the posts).

Anyone who's seen this a number of times--the religious connections are seeming more obvious as I read. A series of threes: The Meg Ryans, the appearances of the "crooked road" symbol (path to factory, lightening bolt, road up the volcano), the three miraculous appearances of the luggage (beam of light at the store, and two miraculous rescues.

Then there's the journey up a mountain to make a human sacrifice which reflects Abraham's journey to sacrifice his son--and Abraham is spared as well!

How long is the journey on the boat? six weeks. Easy connection: Noah and the ark. But there's also the fact that Joe was put on this solitary journey as death approached much the same journey that Jesus took in the desert where he made many of the same type of discoveries that Joe did on the boat.

I'm sure there are more (how old IS Joe anyway? Early 30's is a good guess I think considering nine years since he was a fireman. Could he have been 33 like Christ?)

Beyond that the movie is just lovely and my chest wells up every time I watch it. I agree with a previous poster when he admonished people for apologizing for the film and calling it a guilty pleasure. Guilty pleasures are bad for you, and this is a movie that is very, very good for you.

And hell, I happen to enjoy the wamponi! Abe Vigoda makes me laugh. =)

Just wanted to drop in and say I just saw Yes and found it very, very good. It was fantastically written and I am very surprised that it did not get nominated for any prestigous awards. I will definately look at other movies by Sally Potter from now on.

JVTV has been my favorite film for years. I don't remember why I picked it up at the video store - the strange title, I suppose. But it took me over. It watched me instead of the other way around. I could identify with Joe and his horrible job. I've had jobs like that and slogged along in misery. I loved the shopping trip and the candlelight dinner with the first (secretary) Meg Ryan and Mariachi singers singing a show tune in Spanish. Then out to California, with its entirely different atmosphere and Joe's growing sense of wonder and excitement. I love Joe's humility and ability to accept the growing strangeness of his surroundings. When he dances on the trunks in the middle of the ocean I'm there with him. And when the moon rises and he thanks God for his life, I cry every time. That scene is the cloest I've come to God anywhere. I talked about that scene in a church gathering once when everyone else was talking about Peter and Paul - it did not go over well.

Thanks for adding a link to this to the review.

Did JVtV make the next year's Ebertfest? Is it in line for '10? Etc etc.

I have given up trying to get other people to like this movie. I wouldn't recognize a metaphor or an archetype if it were kissing my grits. What I love about Joe vs the Volcano is that it just is. You can see stuff or you can just let it happen. Either way it's interesting and entertaining. I watch this movie whenever I feel depressed, oppressed, or whenever Monk is having a rerun. I'm really glad to read that other people enjoyed it. Beauty is so much more if you have someone to share it with. Now if I could only get someone else to admit they liked Booty Call.

You can watch movies like The Lion King and get profound things out of it. Watch it after reading A Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell and you will see what I mean. Or you can watch it like a child and enjoy it, too. Good stories are universal and timeless.
I believe JVTV is the quintessential modern American parable. For years I have used it to teach hero archetypes to my AP English classes. Its themes of facing your fears and living an intentional life are enduring transcendental ideas. I also think if one looks at the symbolism (e.g., the crooked road motif) and the music’s lyrics you will see a masterful integration of storytelling. Many “minor” characters are dynamic and integral to one’s journey. The chauffeur (the mentor motif) and the luggage man (a person who follows their bliss) come to mind as helpers we find in life who are “awake.” I believe the film has several of the most important lines in cinema (i.e., “you have a little time left, I suggest you live it well” (by the doctor), “if I had those years now, it’d be like gold in my hand” (Joe to his boss), “who am I, who are you, what are the questions” (Joe to DeeDee in the restaurant), “if you have the choice of killing yourself, or doing what you are afraid of doing, why not do what you are afraid of doing first…take the leap?” (Joe to Angelica in the poem scene), “most of the people in the world are asleep, and those that who are awake live in a state of total amazement” (Patricia to Joe on the boat), “thank you God, whose name I do not know for my…[life]” (Joe in Moon scene, the turning point of the story), “why not jump, take the leap, see what happens, nobody knows anything, just jump” (Patricia to Joe on the volcano), and lastly, “away from the things of man” (Patricia to Joe in the final scene). I may not have quoted the words exactly, but these are powerful statements to living a “deliberate life” that Thoreau spoke of.
Yes, the film is a fun little “date movie”. But like all good stories, it has many fundamental archetypes that people like Joseph Campbell can teach us about living the examined life, a life full of wonder, amazement, and curiosity. As I said, I have used this for years to teach lifelong lessons that stick with my students, stories that make a difference. Is it the greatest movie of all time? Of course not. Just a good movie with those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
Thank you so much for this forum. I’m so glad that I’m not the only one who loved this film.