Chicago Sun-Times
with sports reporters Chris De Luca and Gordon Wittenmyer

Passing on Harden right non-move

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks

The Cubs say that Ted Lilly's surgery last week doesn't change their minds about allowing Rich Harden to become a free agent without making an offer.

And it shouldn't.

Some critics of that sentiment have suggested the Cubs must try to retain Harden, but the team is right to let him go.

Harden's a good guy, and his talent is unquestioned.

But a history of injury problems and a thin free agent market for high-end pitchers almost guarantee Harden's ability to command a multi-year deal and suggest a strong possibility somebody will wind up overpaying for him.

Even in a season his balky shoulder didn't seem to be a problem until the final two weeks of the season, Harden was a pitcher who needed to be managed with extra rest between starts, when possible, and who averaged nearly 18 pitches an inning in 2009 -- making him a five-inning pitcher far too often.

Whether he rebounds to look at dominant as he did the first month the Cubs had him in 2008 (and for glimpses in '09), the risk is too great for a team looking at '11 and beyond for payroll flexibility (with contracts expiring) to make fundamental changes that extend and strengthen its competitive window.

Randy Wells is locked in among three healthy returning starters. Lilly may well be ready to pitch again at a high level by May. Jeff Samardzija may be ready to step into a starter's role next season. Tom Gorzelanny is a competitive candidate for the fifth starter job.

And lefty Sean Marshall is more than deserving of a full-fledged chance to start -- not to mention the fact he has a pretty decent track record as a starter-reliever swing man for this team the past two seasons, making him a capable stand-in for Lilly even if Lilly is out until the All-Star break.

Harden? At worst he'll create more instability in the rotation for a big-ticket price. At best, he's a dice roll not worth taking.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:


So is it your money or what? Why not sign him to a two year deal? He has the best stuff of anyone on the team and he has a better makeup than zambrano and is probalby just as reliable as dempster is. If you don't want to give him a long term deal fine, offer him a short term deal with incentives. Don't give good pitching away for nothing. Not with all the bad contracts the cubs have, it's not going to be easy to deal for more pitching, with all the no trade clauses and long term back weighted deals that hendry sunk the cubs with.

I agree. But I'm not thrilled with the projected starting rotation for 2010. Too many question marks. Not solid by any means.

who cares?

This is exactly what is wrong with the Cubs. Are you seriously suggesting that the Cubs go with Big Z, Lilly, Wells, Samardzjia, and Gorzelanny? Give me a break. You need a bonafide ace to take the VACANT No. 1 pitcher's spot. Big Z is too weak-minded to be an ace. We need an Ace Mr. Wittenmyer, not basement bargains. But I also agree with passing on Harden.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gordon Wittenmyer published on November 8, 2009 5:20 PM.

Cubs to train in Florida? Come on was the previous entry in this blog.

Bradley saga dominates conversation on Day 1 of GM meetings is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.