Chicago Sun-Times
with sports reporters Chris De Luca and Gordon Wittenmyer

Bradley saga dominates conversation on Day 1 of GM meetings

| 5 Comments | No TrackBacks

Cubs general manager Jim Hendry used to face a barrage of questions this time of year centering on all the big names he would be interested in adding during the offseason. This time, he's facing a steady stream of questions asking about the one name everyone knows he must subtract.

Until he's gone, Milton Bradley continues to be Problem No. 1 for the Cubs and Hendry.

Which brought this question to mind Monday during the first day of the general managers meetings at the Hilton Chicago O'Hare Airport: Is there any scenario in which Bradley could return to the Cubs in 2010?

''He's on our roster and until he's not on our roster, that's how you have to look at it,'' Hendry said. ''A lot of people have had worse exits at the end of the year than that and they return.

''The goal is to do the best we can to put a good club on the field by spring training. Until people aren't here, as a general manager, I approach it like they are here. And that's what you deal with.''

Bradley still belongs to the Cubs, but all ties were basically severed when Hendry suspended Bradley with 15 games left in a lost 2009 season. Bradley got no sympathy from his teammates. His manager called him a piece of crap -- though in much harsher terms. And his general manager made it clear he wanted the talented right fielder nowhere near his team in September.

Such a harsh sendoff would be hard enough for the normal player to forget and suddenly play nice by the next February. But Bradley is no ordinary player. He's the same guy who arrived at spring training last February with a chip on his shoulder after the Cubs did something as outrageous as give him a three-year, $30 million contract.

So, no, there is no way Bradley ever wears a Cubs uniform again -- unless he is pulling a practical joke. And Cubs sources say there is no way they are releasing him and eating the $21 million left on his contract. A trade is the only answer and the Cubs suggest a surprising number of teams are showing interest.

The question remains how many of those teams will stay interested when Hendry tells them he is not picking up the heavier end of the remaining price tag. You get the feeling -- after so much trade activity the last week -- that if there was a Bradley deal to be made, it would have been done.

Hendry says he has not talked to Bradley since sending him home, but he has had several conversations with Bradley's agent, Seth Levinson.

Is the Bradley saga becoming a distraction?

''Not at all,'' Hendry said. ''We've got our plan for the offseason. Obviously, that takes its own twists and turns. It has always been a very straightforward situation with [the media]. Some of the best deals we ever made we ones we didn't really anticipate or prepare for. And some of the things that we really had our heart and soul set on, and targeted, haven't worked out as well as we would have liked, too.

''We have some ideas on how to get going, and hopefully, we'll follow that plan in the early stages.''

One of the Cubs' plans is to move Kosuke Fukudome from center field and back to right field, the spot formerly occupied by Bradley.

By the way Hendry was talking about Fukudome returning to his preferred position, there didn't seem to be a scenario that included Bradley in right field.

''It's something we talked about,'' Hendry said. ''I think he's a tremendous defensive player in right, and doesn't feel quite as comfortable defensively in center, so that would be ideal. But that being said, you don't have Willie Mays on your radar yet to play center, either.''

The next question beat again on the Bradley drum.

''He's still with us,'' Hendry said. ''Other people have had some major hiccups along the way and come back. He is on your roster until proven differently.''

But it's clear Hendry can't get his offseason going until he gets rid of his case of hiccups.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/27025

5 Comments

Again, why are any plans made around a slow, weak, non-clutch hitter like Fukodome?

You already have one below average OF in Soriano who's contract makes him not trade able.

Planning on keeping two below average OFs is a sure recipe for year 102 of the title drought! Two years of a not fast enough/ not powerful enough/ awful clutch hitter is enough! Trade if you can get something for him!

Here we go again! Should we put up the "Wait Til Next Year" signs before the 2010 season to make our lives easier?

Every Cub fan, and all baseball insiders, knew that acquiring Milton Bradley was a huge mistake based solely upon his reputation, that is except for Jim Hendry. He has been a head case since he has been in the major leagues, yet he appeared to be a steal at $30 mil to the Cubs brass. Talent is extremely important if you are playing Golf or Tennis, where you have to rely on your individual performance to succeed, but in a team sport like baseball you need to work together to be effective. Sosa,even with his quirks, was a teammate and could also carry the whole team on his back. Milton Bradley couldn't even carry Sosa's jock strap........as the saying goes.

Let's see... 2008 ended with the Cubs playing winning baseball by players who played TOGETHER and exceeded their natural talent day in and day out. They lose in the first round to the Dodgers and suddenly those same players, the TEAM that advanced to the playoffs, aren't worthy of a repeat performance.

The biggest blunder of all was dumping Mark DeRosa, who was an essential part of the team's positive chemistry and played without question whatever position they would need him in the lineup every day.........and performed above all expectations. His reward for his efforts was a ticket out of town to make room for Milton Bradley's newest game.........The Loser Game!

A lot of bad decisions have been made already over the years I am just one lifelong fan waiting for the next big Mistake on the Lake by Hendry and the Cubs. Let's hope that the new owners are prepared to really build a winner like all of the other teams in the major league that seem to know what they are doing!

Lets face it the Cubs need 3 new outfielders! Posednik would be a cheap alternative in center, he's been a winner and can lead off and steal a base!Also Marlon Byrd is another option.

Bradley is the kind of disruptive player that causes dissension in the clubhouse and poor play on the field. He is not a team player by any stretch of the imagination. He did nothing to endear himself to the fans, his manager or teammates. And we're wondering if he'll be back? The Cubs must find yet another home for this spoiled, angry malcontent. Addition by subtraction.

This team is in much worse shape than just the outfield. If you go position by position. Catcher: Soto needs to return to 2008 form -he was horrible in 2009. First Base: Solid with D Lee. Second Base: Who knows - but who ever they have put out there so far is not as good as most of the second baseman. Theriot should problably play second base. He has no where near the range of the quality shortstops. Ramirez at 3rd if healthy - good hitter - average fielder - but for 100 games a year? Outfield - Soriano and Bradley are both horrible fielders and woefully steaky hitters. -Fukadome - who knows. I have been unimpressed with his #s. They say to be strong up the middle. With Soto, Theriot, Fontenot, and no center fielder. It is woefully week up the middle.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris De Luca published on November 9, 2009 8:18 PM.

Passing on Harden right non-move was the previous entry in this blog.

Cubs consider GM meetings ``productive'' is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.