Chicago Sun-Times
Inside the Rod Blagojevich investigation and related cases

Lawyers: Prosecutors would put Blagojevich in the ring with 'arm tied behind his back'

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Lawyers for Rod Blagojevich accused prosecutors Monday of attempting to throw the former governor "into a boxing ring with one arm tied behind his back."

" ... It appears the only request left out by the government is that the defense not be allowed to use the words 'not' and 'guilty' in the same sentence," the defense wrote in a strongly-worded response to a motion from prosecutors last week asking the judge to ban certain arguments in the trial, which is set to begin with jury selection tomorrow.

Here are some of the defense's arguments:

• Blagojevich, lawyers said, isn't publicly misleading anyone about 'playing all the tapes.' Playing more could show the jury that Blagojevich didn't plan a "linear" scheme, the filing argues; prosecutors object that the number of tapes is irrelevant to the case and, besides, they don't need to prove Blagojevich had a linear scheme.

• It's their duty, his lawyers say, to question agents' competence in recording Blagojevich.

• If Judge James Zagel agrees to uphold prosecutors' motion to ban some of these arguments in court, the jury will think of the Court as an extension of the government, they wrote.

• The defense responded to a government request to bar any testimony or evidence about events after December 5, 2008, when the Chicago Tribune reported Blagojevich's lobbyist and friend John Wyma was recording conversations with the then-governor. The defense suggests the possibility -- though they say they have no evidence of it -- that the government intentionally leaked the information to the Tribune: "A far more effective argument is that the 'leak' came from the government's cup of water, so to speak." In a retort, prosecutors called this argument "absurd" and irrelevant. To read filing, Click here

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/39987

2 Comments

Why aren't the feds throwing John Chase in prison until he reveals the name of the leaker? I would think that the feds would be very angry that the case was leaked before any criminal action had been taken. More than likely, the feds leaked to John Chase to protect Rahm and Obama from the same strict interpretation of the laws as applied to Governor Blagojevich. This case stinks of politics.

I alway's thought it was John Wyma who tipped off John Chase, it's interesting that Rod thinks it was the fed's....that would be the reason why they never investigated it....WHO tipped off Obama and his administration? Was it the same person?

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Lark Turner published on April 19, 2011 11:22 AM.

Jury foreperson: Defense put on a circus, prosecution confused us was the previous entry in this blog.

Blagojevich retrial: 150 potential jurors summoned to start selection is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.