Chicago Sun-Times
Inside the Rod Blagojevich investigation and related cases

Prosecutors want to air Blagojevich's legal bills

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

Reporting with Sarah Ostman


The trial adjourned early today as lawyers battled over airing Rod Blagojevich's $1.2 million debt to Winston & Strawn law firm in spring of 2008.

Outside of the jury's presence, prosecutors, who were about to show the jury a chart detailing his legal bills, say it's relevant to reveal Blagojevich's need for cash in early 2008.

The firm sent a letter in March, 2008 saying they hadn't received payment in more than a year and that they were terminating their relationship with Blagojevich.

Defense lawyer Shelly Sorosky complained that detailing the bills was beyond prejudicial to Blagojevich. Sorosky said that out of 500 hours of recorded conversations, Blagojevich never said he needed money to pay lawyers. Sorosky said the evidence about Blagojevich's shopping habits (that he spent $400,000 on fine clothing) had a "touch of humor." But the legal bills did not.

"Not once in the taped conversation is there any, any reference to, Oh, I got to raise money to pay lawyers," Sorosky said.
He said the legal bill, which was negotiated down, was paid four months earlier.

(Prosecutor Reid Schar quibbled with that assertion.)

Judge James Zagel asked for more information in the morning but said, outstanding bills, "show a significant need for money in 2008 is really relevant," and was likely to allow the jury to hear only the final bill amount.

Finally, Zagel told the defense it has to "set forth precisely" its affirmative defense, that is, what they are going to say Blagojevich told a lawyer and what a lawyer said in response. The defense has said it will put on a case that says Blagojevich acted on the advice of counsel.

Zagel gave some examples, including:
"'I don't think they have anything on you, Rocky,' that's not advice of counsel."

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/33819

3 Comments

First he needed money for clothes, according to the prosecution, but he never used his campaign chest for clothing, and the fundraising help offered by Katz (Obama camp) and JJJ was for the campaign chest, not his personal pocket. The prosecution needed to bring up the legal bills as his motive from the beginning because the bills were paid out of the campaign chest and he was looking at the "double I's." Bringing the legal bills up, now, on the last day of their case, just screams, to me, that they were trying to prejudice the jury with the clothes stuff, not trying to show motive.

Blago blew how much money on lawyers???

Funny considering that Blago is a lawyer himself. Why not do his own work for free? Oh, that's right. He was too busy using his private jet to go on vacation...

And if a lawyer was working as a waitress, you would not infer that "I recommend today's special" is legal advice.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Natasha Korecki published on July 12, 2010 4:38 PM.

Witness: If I waited for Blagojevich's word on matters "the state would have ground to a halt." was the previous entry in this blog.

Blagojevich trial: Today's exhibits is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.