Chicago Sun-Times

Bears need to retire Ditka's No. 89

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

He played on or coached the Bears' last two championship teams. recently voted him the greatest No. 89 in NFL history. Forty-four years after playing his last game as a Bear, he still holds three team receiving records, but his legacy extends far beyond that.

With the exception of George Halas, his name and face best represent one of football's founding franchises, which begs the question: Why haven't the Bears retired Mike Ditka's number?

''Are you telling me they haven't done that already?'' ex-Packers great Paul Hornung said. ''If they retired [Dick] Butkus' and [Gale] Sayers', they have to retire Ditka's, for Christ's sake. It's ridiculous. It should have been done 40 years ago. He's one of the best players in the history of the Bears, and as a coach, he won the Super Bowl. He did everything. There wasn't a better player, period.''

The Bears have retired 13 numbers, more than any other franchise. Team executives worry about running out of numbers if they retire all the ones that deserve such recognition. Mike Singletary's No. 50 should be set aside, for example, as should Dan Hampton's No. 99. Twenty years from now, Brian Urlacher or Lance Briggs might warrant consideration.

It's an interesting dilemma, to be sure, but given all he has meant to the franchise, if the Bears aren't going to retire Ditka's number, they should unretire them all. You can't retire the numbers of some worthy players but not other worthy Bears.

''You can't change the experience I had as a player and a coach,'' Ditka said. ''You can't erase it. It was there. They were all great experiences. Everything wasn't perfect, but they were pretty good experiences because I got to fulfill my dreams. I appreciate it, but [not having my number retired] doesn't bother me. It doesn't come into my mind. You can't change what I had.''

Hats off to Ditka for being at a stage in his life in which he doesn't need the recognition, but it's still the right thing to do, and the 25th anniversary of the Ditka-led 1985 Bears is the ideal time to do it. The league has even recently started allowing receivers to wear numbers in the teens, rendering the loss of No. 89 moot.

Good time to do it
Ditka isn't getting any younger, either. He's 71, and it would be a shame if the Bears wait until he's no longer around.

The stars are aligned to make this happen. The long-simmering feud between the McCaskeys and Ditka has ended, as evidenced by Brian McCaskey attending a recent golf outing to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Super Bowl- winning team.

''I don't have any animosity,'' Ditka said. ''I probably did for a couple of years, but I don't anymore. I root for the Bears.''

Maybe the Bears are afraid to retire a number after what happened last time. When Butkus (No. 51) and Sayers (40) had their numbers retired in 1994, monsoon-like winds and rain set the stage for a horrific Monday night loss to the Packers. Brett Favre didn't complete a pass in the first half, and the Bears still trailed 14-0 en route to a humiliating 33-6 drubbing.

''Mike definitely deserves this honor when you consider his involvement in the Bears' last two championship seasons, not to mention the fact that he is one of only seven tight ends in the Pro Football Hall of Fame,'' said former Bears executive Ken Valdi- serri, who was directly involved with coordinating the retiring of Sayers' and Butkus' numbers.

Just as worthy
Butkus and Sayers are icons who richly deserved the honor, but no one can deny that Ditka was in their class as a player and is even more deserving because he resurrected the moribund franchise as a coach.

''There's no question they should retire his number,'' Sayers said. ''He was an outstanding football player, and he was in the Hall of Fame and became an outstanding coach. There's no question in my mind that it should be retired.''

The Bears would like to have a ring of honor at Soldier Field but aren't allowed because they don't own the stadium, and the Park District wants to maintain it as a multipurpose venue. Plans to erect a statue of Walter Payton outside Soldier Field are on hold over concerns that it will be viewed as desecrating a war memorial.

Retiring Ditka's number is something the Bears don't need permission or a permit to do. It's the right thing to do and the ideal time to do it.

It's time to give Da Coach his due.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:


You did a bad job of reporting.
I talked to Patrick Mccaskey about 2 years ago at te Bears Expo and he told me the NFL has asked the bears organization not to retire any more numbers because they've already retired too many.

No way hosay. Did you see the comments he made about Jen Sterger that he has zero suympathy for her story? Ditka is nothing but a chauvinistic pig. He is famous today sense he has been a media hore living off what he did 25 years ago. And his restauarnt is terrible. I went there and almsot threw up in my mouth. They have no meals that accomidate vegetarians like my self. Disgusting.

Also he smokes cigars and cigar smoke makes my asthma act up. So no he should not have his number retired. In fact noone from the Beras should sense the last three decades we have only had one superbowel win. Loosers top to bottom. Angelo needs to be fired that is the first step in fixcing this mess.

Restaurants are for people not vegetarians, Creighton. ANd Brett, you think because a McCaskey said something that it's gospel? Ditka had a bust up with the McCaskeys because they're idiots that don't understand football. Sayers played for a couple of years and won nothing, but he gets his jersey retired and Ditka doesn't? It's crazy. Thanks for the memories Mike.

Leave a comment

Twitter updates


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Neil Hayes published on November 1, 2010 9:13 AM.

Which Bears should have numbers retired was the previous entry in this blog.

Vikings officially release Moss is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.