Chicago Sun-Times

Four Down Territory, April 23: Picking a position if it's not a receiver

| 9 Comments | No TrackBacks

william-moore.jpg


Q: Wide receiver is the Bears' biggest need in the draft but count me among the crowd that is concerned they will be looking at the 8th or 9th wide receiver by the time their pick comes up. If that is the case, why draft a receiver that not only might not make much impact this season, but might not be anything down the road? Really what I want to know is what else Jerry Angelo could look at if he doesn't take a receiver?

Evan E., Chicago

A: You make a valid point and I believe it's the same thing the Bears have been mulling over for a couple weeks now. Do they pick a receiver to fill a glaring need for depth just to have one, or do they consider a player with a far better grade at a different position? It is all going to depend on how the draft board falls. I think it is safe to say that if they don't pull the trigger on a receiver that they will most assuredly being going with defense.

Maybe you wonder why Angelo would not consider an offensive lineman. Well, he laid out a pretty good reason earlier this week. The Bears already have eight veteran offensive linemen they will carry. Adding a ninth will force them to trim from elsewhere on the 53-man roster. Angelo feels better about his line than he has in some time. They believe line coach Harry Hiestand does a terrific job, particularly after last season, and they will not look at the line early in the draft. Quarterback, running back and tight end are not need areas, so we turn to the defense.

The Bears are set at linebacker for this season and the history of Angelo and coach Lovie Smith is for them to draft defensive linemen and defensive backs in quantity.

At defensive end, which is where the Bears have a need with three players heading into the final year of their contract, I don't know if there is a player who will fit their scheme that will be on the board. Northern Illinois' Larry English could slide into the second round, but won't go that far and he doesn't match what the Bears are seeking. There are a couple of nice players at the top of the list but they will be gone.

At defensive tackle, Missouri's Ziggy Hood would be ideal but he also could be off the board before the Bears select. Again, the top tier players are going to be gone and those that will remain don't look to be great fits for the scheme or good value for the round.

So that takes us to the secondary. First, we want to lean on something Angelo talked about on Tuesday when asked about the safety position. He said the club has a profile and they're looking for a player with good size. They've had more than their share of injuries at the position and want to minimize the chance for that by going with bigger players who theoretically will be more durable. For my money, that eliminates someone like Alabama's Rashad Johnson, at least with this pick. You can poke a hole in virtually all of these guys and size is an issue. Western Michigan's Louis Delmas has durability issues. He's not big either. The guy that could be a match here is Missouri's William Moore, a 6-foot, 221-pounder. It's too early at this pick for Texas Tech's Darcel McBath. Oregon's Patrick Chung could also be a fit and he had a durable career to have confidence in when considering him.

At cornerback, Troy Sherrod Martin is interesting and the Bears sent defensive backs coach Jon Hoke in to work him out. Some teams see Martin as a free safety, but he has durability concerns in his past and sometimes these workouts are fancy smokescreens. This position isn't nearly as needed and the Bears are not going to move Charles Tillman to free safety and are not inclined to shift Corey Graham at this point.


Q: I don't remember where I saw this, but I read a report somewhere that the Bears had quietly promoted Greg Olsen to starter prior to minicamp this off-season. Can you substantiate or refute that, or is that really impossible to determine?

Michael L., Parts Unknown

A: Veteran Desmond Clark made 16 starts last season while Olsen got seven as the Bears did so much work in double tight-end formations, a product of their strength at the position and the ineffective play they got from their wide receivers. Clark has been remarkably durable at one of the most statistically injured positions in the league. He's played in all 16 games for four straight seasons and has missed a total of two games in six seasons with the Bears. Clark is considered a much better blocker in the run game than Olsen and that right there will be the biggest obstacle to Olsen getting on the field more. While Clark had nine more starts, there wasn't a big difference in their playing time. For a little more on this, I asked Lovie Smith about the possibility of Olsen carving out a more consistent starting role.

"Who starts doesn't really matter,'' Smith said. "Both guys played last year. Last year, we considered Greg a starter. It's like you have a third receiver who is a starter. I feel like we had 13 starters on the offense. Defense, the nickel is like a starter. Greg is one of the guys."

And, to finish up, yes it's a little too early to discern something like this unless you've seen a guy go straight to the doghouse. The depth chart is going to be fluid until training camp. I'd expect a similar situation this year.


Q: Is Brandon Rideau going to get a look this year? I seem to remember him being a star of last year's preseason. He has decent size and speed and great hands, traits which are well-suited for a West Coast offense. Does he get a chance to play this year, or is he destined to be a star on someone else's team? I think he can be a starter on the Bears if given a chance next to Devin Hester, and certainly the Bears need some height in the receiver corps. What do you think?

John S., Schaumburg

A: Rideau was a star of the preseason if you count leading the league in touchdowns with three. Problem is most of his action came in garbage time when it's difficult to evaluate play. The bottom line was he was on the field making plays. It was confusing to me why he didn't get a better look last season when you consider what little production the team was getting from its receivers. One of the obstacles Rideau faced, and will continue to face is that he didn't have a role on special teams. Backup receivers have to be active in that phase and he wasn't able to earn a spot there. He's got terrific size at 6-3, 198 pounds, and his speed is adequate. I don't know enough about his hands right now to evaluate them. I wouldn't classify him as a sure star in the making for someone else. Remember, he was cut at the end of preseason before he was re-signed to the practice squad and 31 other teams had a chance to make him a star right then and there. Rideau will have a chance. It will be a bigger chance if the Bears wait past the second round to draft a receiver.


Q: Just saw some speculation that the Bengals might be willing to trade Chad Ochocinco for a second-round pick. Do you think this would be a move the Bears would consider? It seems to fit their win-now philosophy, and would bring a proven receiver into the fold rather than a youngster who may or may not pan out.

Paul, Steger

A: It looks to be a moot point because the Bengals say Ochocinco is staying put whether he likes it or not. Angelo has been pretty clear, he'll be drafting talent at wide receiver. I don't expect any more blockbuster trades.

We'll check in with our final Four Down Territory before the draft on Friday. We'll also deliver some projected combinations of players for the Bears with the first two picks as well as a complete roster breakdown and more. Make sure you check in with us often on Saturday and Sunday. We'll be blogging constantly from Halas Hall and will do our best to have instant analysis on the action. Thanks for all of the participation and thanks as always for reading and making this two months or so of pre-draft buildup exciting.


No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/22005

9 Comments

brad, i had a questin about staley da bear. he is my best frend brad. my mom took me too meet him ans he give me a hug ans a baloon. i was so happy. so i was wundering were staley da bear lives? oh ans what does he eat? ans how old is he? im 49 years old but i think my mom would be ok with taking me to staleys house to play. im a big boy.

with much love , crap-ton

ps i HATE wehn my mom turns off my xbox ans tells me to get a job!!

Brad any word on Earl Bennett? I saw a quote you posted were Turner said Cutler was throwing the ball everyday and putting his work in. I was wondering if Bennett was doing the same? I would think that with a new QB and a desperate need for help at reciever that all the recievers would be trying to put in some extra work with him. So you got any idea of who he is throwing the ball to?

aren't Bennett, Forte, and Olsen all at college currently? My memory is fuzzy on this stuff sometimes, but I thought we had 3-4 guys finishing up their degrees this off season.

Why is Crap-ton allowed to post? I thought this blog was checked before a post is posted. His idiocy is unbelievable. The team is preparing to draft this clown is wasting space talking about Staley the freakin bear. He is a joke and a waste of space. If playing special teams has prevented a reciever from making the roster how stupid is that? Watch he'll shine again in the pre-season then be out for the year playing special teams.

First of all, much thanks Biggs-y for being our eyes and ears in Halas Hall ... this blog is a must read several times a day. You are blowing away McClure and LeGere.
Second, can Patrick Chung play free safety? Are there are any other corners out there who can project to free safety. I think Va Tech's Macho Harris can - who else?

Brad- with the need at FS, have the Bears had any internal or external conversations about Ko Simpson from the Bills? I know it's a team they've traded with in the past. Simpson is a good, not great FS, good size, good range and was a 4th round pick so I don't think he'd take more than a mid-rounder to acquire. He'd give them a solid veteran presence that can play the cover 2 and doesn't need any grooming.

heron25 .... you description of Ko Simpson sounds alot like Josh Bullocks.

Hey DeputyDog Crap-ton is entertaining, funny and a wise ass in sorta a nice way. Enjoy his post while Creighton and I give him fire power it is hilarious to read.

Brando are you trying to protect your alter-ego? If he could spell or at least be relevant it's cool be trying to read it gives me a headache. Anyway I am still a believer a starter/playmaker on defense is the key to this draft, D-Line first safety or LB next then WR, OL and more defense.

Leave a comment

Twitter updates

Categories

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brad Biggs published on April 23, 2009 10:06 PM.

Turner says his relationship with Cutler off to great start was the previous entry in this blog.

Bears do their homework on Eastern's Pierre Walters is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.