It didn't get a great deal of attention, but on Monday the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of Mayor Daley's patronage chief, Robert Sorich, and two other men charged in a scheme to award city jobs or overtime to political workers.
This is good news for federal prosecutors here and good news for the citizens of Chicago.
It means the legal tactics that the prosecutor used to put the men in prison passes muster.
And the defense that what the men did wasn't really crime?
Well, it didn't work on the highest court in the land.
Judge Antonin Scalia offered a strong dissent, saying the court should have taken up the issue. The legal tactics in the Sorich case could be used, in theory, against "a salaried employee's phoning in sick to go to a ball game."
Such a comparison denigrates what really happened in the Sorich case.
Sorich and his colleagues oversaw a system that rigged city of Chicago hiring tests and interviews, a process that routinely gave city jobs to political workers who benefitted the mayor and his allies.
So hundreds of Average Joes waited in line to take a test or be interviewed, and the fix was in before they even walked in the door.
Hard-working city employees didn't get the promotions they deserved. Political hacks took them instead.
We feel some sympathy to the argument that Sorich and his colleagues weren't the big fish in the pond. They weren't the queen bees, only the worker bees.
That's true, to some extent, but it doesn't excuse what they did.
The U.S. Supreme Court's action on Monday leaves open the possibility that a day of reckoning for the higher-ups is still possible.
This blog brought to you by the Sun-Times editorial board (click on names to read bios):