Chicago Sun-Times
A dialog between Sun-Times opinion writers and our readers

Preckwinkle tries carrot instead of stick

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

a-sheriff.jpgUsually, the political argument we hear is that we need less government.

But in Cook County, it's the opposite. County officials are saying they want less to govern.

Cook County is technically the municipal authority for the many remaining unincorporated pockets dotting the county. Cook County sheriff's police patrol those areas. Cook County also does the building inspections.

But serving small pockets of land that are separated by miles of village or city acreage is inefficient, and the county would like to get out of the business.

The areas remain unincorporated largely for two reasons: 1) They are tax base losers, meaning it would cost a nearby city or village more to serve the area than the municipality would get back in taxes, or 2) They are tax winners, in the sense that people living there are happy not to be paying taxes for parks or libraries.

Many of the unincorporated areas also have substandard infrastructure. They might not have sidewalks. Or sewers, using septic systems instead. The streets might not be what a municipality would consider up to code.

Last year, Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle suggested creating special service districts that would impose an extra levy on unincorporated areas. That idea didn't fly.

Now, she's putting down the stick and trying a carrot. In her proposed 2013 budget, she allocates $5 million to help fund infrastructure improvements that might make the unincorporated areas more suitable for annexation into an existing suburb.

"I have said that over the next decade we are going to try to eliminate unincorporated Cook County," Preckwinkle told the Sun-Times Editorial Board last week."We spend a lot of resources on the 100,000 people who live there. And we found that one of the principal impediments to incorporation by the nearby towns, cities and villages is the state of their infrastructure. ... So we have created a fund of $5 million to help them upgrade their infrastructure so that they can be annexed by surrounding communities without tremendous costs to those municipalities."

Budget Director Andrea Gibson said the fund will be on a "cash match" basis, meaning the muncipality that does the annexation will be expected to kick in its share.

Of course $5 million is barely a start considering what it would take to get all unincorporated infrastructure up to municipal standards. But Kurt Summers, Preckwinkle's chief of staff, said the county will focus on getting one area at a time up to snuff and annexed, and then refill the coffers.

Follow BackTalk on Twitter@stbacktalk

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Thomas Frisbie published on October 22, 2012 6:09 PM.

New day in court for prisoners convicted through torture? was the previous entry in this blog.

The cost of gun violence to taxpayers is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.