Chicago Sun-Times
A dialog between Sun-Times opinion writers and our readers

Blago trial - 'one of the Al Capone tax evasion cases of today'

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

Of all the people I talked to before the verdict came down in the trial of former Gov. Rod Blagojevich and his brother, Robert, the person who came closest to predicting it correctly was Waukegan defense lawyer Jed Stone.

Stone predicted the former governor would be convicted of lying to an FBI agent, but not on the 23 other counts against him. That's what happened, although Stone didn't predict the jury would be hung on the other counts.

On Monday, Stone explained his reasoning:

"If you look at what is going on nationally - [Lewis] "Scooter" Libby, Martha Stewart, all of those people - they all went down on lying to a government agent.

"Even [former Chicago Police Cmdr. Jon] Burge didn't go down for torturing. He went down for lying about it."

(Libby and Stewart also were convicted of other charges.)

The number of convictions for lying to the government is not a trend in criminal justice that pleases everyone. One Chicago lawyer calls it "the crime of lying to the Grand Inquisitor."

Stone says convictions for lying to government agents have become "the Al Capone tax evasion cases of today." Capone was convicted of evading income tax rather than for smuggling, bootlegging liquor, bribery and his other crimes.

The prevalence of these cases, though, does raise the question of whether people will simply stop talking to federal government agents. If a large number of people took that view, even those who were not targets of a probe but were just being cautions, that could hamper investigations.

Follow BackTalk on Twitter@stbacktalk

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/34930

3 Comments

and the government fbi, u.s. attorneys office lie all day long...why doesn't anyone in the press go after the 2 hour meeting Fitz is protecting??? He should be held to a higher standard and should not be allowed to protect some who perjure themselves while prosecuting others.

Years ago, a couple of FBI agents turned up at our door doing a background check on a neighbor who was about to get a significant promotion in the military. It was the era of protests against the Vietnam War, so our first instinct was to shoo them off. Then we realized answering their questions would benefit our neighbor and our country, so we did.

The history of the FBI is a mixture of admirable law enforcement and persecution of people with unpopular opinions. I can't understand why anyone in the news, presumably with access to legal counsel, ever talks to the FBI. Considering the risks you cite, I wouldn't.na5tsu

It's of course wrong to lie to an investigator and I think that the smart choice wold be to refuse to talk to one, not lie. Public officials and famous people are held to different standards because they have to be.


Guide to Chicago's Best

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Thomas Frisbie published on August 23, 2010 8:41 PM.

City Colleges 'Butler buildings' - the new Willis wagons was the previous entry in this blog.

When will Cook County tax bills come out? Who knows? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.