Classifieds SearchChicago Autos SearchChicago Homes  Jobs Sun-Times Find a Pet Classified Ads


Read 'em and weep

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Men can shed a tear or two and still be taken seriously. Women, well, not so much.

A Penn State study found that people's reactions to crying depends on the type of crying and who was doing it. A moist eye was better than copious tears. And a moist eye on men was better than a moist eye on women. That jibes with what Tom Lutz, author of a history of crying, believes. "Bill [Clinton] could cry, and did, but Hillary can't," he told AP. For men, a tear or two can make them look sensitive. For women, it can make them appear overly emotional. Then again, if they don't show any emotion, they could get called a robot.

There should be a different standard for crying, not for men and women, but for politicians and the rest of us. Whether they're shed by a man or a woman, those political tears can all too often be contrived and manipulating.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Read 'em and weep.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/4597

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Back Talk

This blog brought to you by the Sun-Times editorial board (click on names to read bios):
  • Tom McNamee

  • Kate N. Grossman

  • Steve Warmbir

  • About this Entry

    This page contains a single entry by published on October 29, 2007 3:35 PM.

    Sympathy for George Ryan was the previous entry in this blog.

    Give us a break: Vajayjays? is the next entry in this blog.

    Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

    Pages