<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Gold Rush</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards/40</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40" title="The Gold Rush" />
    <updated>2008-06-27T19:38:48Z</updated>
    <subtitle>An award-winnowing blog from the Sun-Times</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.21</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Emmys leak early nominee finalists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/06/emmys_leak_early_nominee_final.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=10477" title="Emmys leak early nominee finalists" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.10477</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-27T19:35:14Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-27T19:38:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In an unprecedented move designed to head off the kind of cyberspace leaks that have played havoc with the nomination process the past two years, the Academy of Television Arts &amp; Sciences on Thursday opted to release onto its Web...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Emmys" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In an unprecedented move designed to head off the kind of cyberspace leaks that have played havoc with the nomination process the past two years, the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences on Thursday opted to release onto its Web site the top 10 finalists for nominations for the 60th annual Primetime Emmy Awards in the outstanding comedy series and drama series categories.</p>

<p>The lists represent voting from the entire TV Academy membership and comprise 50 percent of the nomination tally. The other 50 percent will be determined this weekend during Blue Ribbon Panel screenings of submitted episodes before a collection of judges. The final list of nominees will be revealed July 17.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>As for the shows on the list, there were several surprises of both inclusion and omission. None is bigger than the Fox animated half-hour ‘‘Family Guy’’ making the cut, the result of creator-producer Seth MacFarlane having opted to switch his subversive ’toon to comedy series contention while simultaneously submitting a special episode to the animated program category.</p>

<p>No animated series has ever received a nomination for outstanding comedy. ‘‘Family Guy’’ would be the first, and it’s halfway there. The only other series to try a similar gambit was ‘‘The Simpsons’’ in the early 1990s, but it was never able to crank the comedy series list and opted thereafter to place all of its eggs in the animated program basket.</p>

<p>Another unexpected finalist on the comedy short list of 10 is the first-year HBO half-hour ‘‘Flight of the Conchords,’’ about New Zealanders Bret McKenzie and Jemaine Clement and their musical hijinks in New York City. ‘‘Conchords,’’ joined by perennial nominees ‘‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’’ and ‘‘Entourage,’’ gave HBO three of the 10 comedy slots, more than any other network.</p>

<p>NBC and ABC claimed a pair of comedy nominees apiece. NBC’s contenders include last year’s Emmy winner, ‘‘30 Rock,’’ and the victor two years ago, ‘‘The Office.’’ ABC’s are Golden Globe winner ‘‘Ugly Betty’’ and the acclaimed rookie hour ‘‘Pushing Daisies.’’</p>

<p>Rounding out the comedy finalists are CBS’ ‘‘Two and a Half Men’’ (nominated the past two years) and Showtime’s ‘‘Weeds,’’ which if nominated would become the first-ever non-HBO cable nominee in the category. Among the shows snubbed this year in comedy are previous nominees ‘‘Desperate Housewives’’ (ABC) and ‘‘Scrubs’’ (NBC) as well as the first-year ABC hit ‘‘Samantha Who?’’</p>

<p>As for the drama series finalists, one that will receive much fanfare in the critical community is HBO’s never-nominated ‘‘The Wire,’’ long a critical darling but ignored entirely in the Emmy voting. It made the list of 10 contenders in its final, much-praised season, carrying all of HBO’s hopes in the category a year after that network walked off with the gold for ‘‘The Sopranos.’’ Indeed, both ‘‘Big Love’’ and the freshman therapy half-hour ‘‘In Treatment’’ were given far better shots at nominations, but neither survived the cut.</p>

<p>Of those that landed on the short list, fully half come from cable. Besides ‘‘Wire,’’ there are the heavily buzzed first-year entries ‘‘Mad Men’’ from AMC and FX’s ‘‘Damages’’ as well as the Showtime second-year pair ‘‘Dexter’’ and ‘‘The Tudors.’’ Of the five broadcast network entries, three — Fox’s ‘‘House’’ and ABC’s ‘‘Boston Legal’’ and ‘‘Grey’s Anatomy’’ — made the nomination lineup in 2007. The other two are ABC’s ‘‘Lost’’ (passed over last year) and NBC’s ‘‘Friday Night Lights.’’</p>

<p>If ‘‘Mad Men,’’ ‘‘Damages,’’ ‘‘Dexter’’ or ‘‘The Tudors’’ make it to the nominations round, it would be a first for a non-HBO cable drama.</p>

<p>Failing to crack the top 10 were such favorites as ABC’s ‘‘Brothers & Sisters,’’ NBC’s ‘‘Heroes’’ (nominated a year ago but a victim of losing considerable heat during its second, truncated season), the TNT drama ‘‘The Closer’’ and AMC’s quirky and disturbing hour ‘‘Breaking Bad’’ starring Bryan Cranston.</p>

<p>Part of the rationale for the early release of the series short-listers was to avoid the kind of rumors and confusion that circulated in the wake of the publishing of the unofficial lists on blogs. ‘‘We thought it a good idea to make sure people weren’t forced to get this information from secondary sources but straight from the academy,’’ an ATAS spokesman said.</p>

<p>The TV Academy had reportedly planned to release the 10 top finalists in the acting races, too, but the idea was shelved because of the more individualized nature of judging in those categories, according to a source. The official disclosure of those lists in advance now isn’t expected to happen at all.<br />
Full list:</p>

<p>Outstanding drama: ‘‘Boston Legal,’’ ‘‘Damages,’’ ‘‘Dexter,’’ ‘‘Friday Night Lights,’’ ‘‘Grey’s Anatomy,’’ ‘‘House,’’ ‘‘Lost,’’ ‘‘Mad Men,’’ ‘‘The Tudors’’ and ‘‘The Wire.’’</p>

<p>Outstanding comedy: ‘‘Curb Your Enthusiasm,’’ ‘‘Entourage,’’ ‘‘Family Guy,’’ ‘‘Flight of the Conchords,’’ ‘‘The Office,’’ ‘‘Pushing Daisies,’’ ‘‘30 Rock,’’ ‘‘Two and a Half Men,’’ ‘‘Ugly Betty,’’ ‘‘Weeds.’’</p>

<p><br />
<em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&apos;Wall-E&apos; bow kicks off Oscar season</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/06/walle_bow_kicks_off_oscar_seas.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=10457" title="'Wall-E' bow kicks off Oscar season" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.10457</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-26T16:18:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-26T16:33:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary> (Photo illustration by Thomas Conner) With Pixar’s newest blue-chip animated movie ‘‘Wall-E’’ hitting theaters Friday, the 2008 Oscar race is finally off and running. It’s an unofficial starting gun, of course. Technically, any movie that’s had a commercial release...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3044/2612818463_9f6dc1e455.jpg" width="500" height="352" alt="062608oscars.jpg" /><br />
<em>(Photo illustration by Thomas Conner)</em></p>

<p>With Pixar’s newest blue-chip animated movie ‘‘Wall-E’’ hitting theaters Friday, the 2008 Oscar race is finally off and running.</p>

<p>It’s an unofficial starting gun, of course. Technically, any movie that’s had a commercial release of at least a week in Los Angeles County since the start of the year is eligible to compete. But the first half of the year rarely yields much in the way of Oscar fodder, and this year has been no exception.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>May’s Festival de Cannes didn’t do much to clarify the situation, either: Several promising foreign films aside, only Clint Eastwood’s ‘‘Changeling,’’ starring Angelina Jolie, emerged as a mainstream contender.</p>

<p>Most of the remaining summer popcorn fare isn’t generally regarded as Oscar worthy, though if critics and fans applaud Heath Ledger’s turn as the Joker in ‘‘The Dark Knight’’ when it is released July 18, Warner Bros. is ready to support a campaign on his behalf. Only one acting Oscar has been bestowed posthumously — to Peter Finch for 1976’s ‘‘Network’’ — but five others have been nominated in the wake of their deaths, including James Dean, who earned noms for ‘‘East of Eden’’ and ‘‘Giant.’’</p>

<p>But while Oscar strategists are marking time, waiting for the fall festival circuit to launch a wave of hopefuls, the animation race has begun to take shape.</p>

<p>The critics are just beginning to weigh in on ‘‘Wall-E’’ — the Village Voice’s Robert Wilonsky has already called it ‘‘both breathtakingly majestic and heartbreakingly intimate’’ — but the buzz surrounding the film about a lovelorn robot already is so heady, there’s no doubt it will be the movie to beat for best animated film. The bigger question is whether it might become a candidate for a best picture slot.</p>

<p>At one point last year, director Brad Bird wanted to position his ‘‘Ratatouille’’ in the best picture heat, but he was convinced to focus on the best animated film category, which it handily won while also picking up noms in four other categories.</p>

<p>But if today’s moviegoers warm to ‘‘Wall-E’’ the way an earlier generation embraced ‘‘E.T. the Extra-Terrestial,’’ then the latest Pixar effort could find itself contending with the big boys for best picture.</p>

<p>In any event, the photo-real, computer-animated ‘‘Wall-E’’ should dominate the animation arena, which given the number of films expected to be released this year should yield three Oscar nominees.<br />
Fox and Blue Sky Studios’ ‘‘Horton Hears a Who’’ looks like a strong contender for bringing Dr. Seuss’ illustrations into the CG realm. DreamWorks Animation will have two hopefuls with ‘‘Kung Fu Panda’’ and the upcoming ‘‘Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa.’’</p>

<p>Other titles that could figure prominently are ‘‘Waltz With Bashir,’’ an Israeli film set amid the Lebanon War that Sony Pictures Classics plans to promote in multiple categories, and the stop-motion ‘‘Coraline,’’ Henry Selick’s adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s book, which Focus has slated for a late-December release.</p>

<p>On the live-action front, the picture is much murkier.</p>

<p>At Cannes, ‘‘Changeling,’’ Eastwood’s period drama, drew appreciative reviews, putting it on the same award-winning track ‘‘Mystic River’’ followed in 2003. Jolie was hailed as a definite Oscar nominee for her performance as a single mother who fights the Los Angeles establishment; then again, prognosticators said the same thing about last year’s ‘‘A Mighty Heart,’’ though that one failed to secure her an acting nom. Writer J. Michael Straczynski, in a major change of pace for the creator of ‘‘Babylon 5,’’ also could find himself courting awards consideration for his based-on-fact screenplay.</p>

<p>Real question marks surround a number of the other American films that debuted at Cannes. Steven Soderbergh’s ‘‘Che,’’ Charlie Kaufman’s ‘‘Synecdoche, New York’’ and James Gray’s ‘‘Two Lovers’’ all left town without securing distribution deals, raising the possibility that they might not even qualify for awards attention this year.</p>

<p>With the specialty film business under siege — and such past Oscar players as Picturehouse, Warner Independent and New Line out of the picture — Hollywood might be facing a leaner, if not meaner, Oscar season.</p>

<p>Yet there are still plenty of awards aspirants coming from pedigreed filmmakers.</p>

<p>Leonardo DiCaprio will appear in Ridley Scott’s CIA tale ‘‘Body of Lies’’ and Sam Mendes’ domestic drama ‘‘Revolutionary Road’’ opposite Kate Winslet, who also stars in Stephen Daldry’s ‘‘The Reader,’’ set in post-World War II Germany.</p>

<p>Also on tap are adaptations of such award-winning plays as ‘‘Doubt,’’ directed by John Patrick Shanley, and ‘‘Frost/Nixon,’’ directed by Ron Howard; such critically applauded novels as Fernando Meirelles’ screen version of ‘‘Blindness,’’ Gina Prince-Bythewood’s ‘‘The Secret Lives of Bees’’ and John Hillcoat’s ‘‘The Road’’; and also David Fincher’s imagining of the F. Scott Fitzgerald short story ‘‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.’’</p>

<p>Taking on big topics are director Baz Lurhmann, returning to the screen with the epic ‘‘Australia’’; Oliver Stone, tackling President Bush in ‘‘W’’; and Gus Van Sant, looking at a hero of the gay rights movement in ‘‘Milk.’’</p>

<p>Will Smith, who earned an Oscar nomination in Gabriele Muccino’s ‘‘The Pursuit of Happyness,’’ is reteaming with the director in ‘‘Seven Pounds’’; Keira Knightley will don period garb again for Saul Dibb’s ‘‘The Duchess’’; Robert Downey Jr. will play a journalist who befriends a homeless musician, played by Jamie Foxx, in Joe Wright’s ‘‘The Soloist’’; Daniel Craig will lead a group of Jewish resistance fighters in Nazi-occupied Poland in Ed Zwick’s ‘‘Defiance’’; and last year’s big winners, the Coen brothers, will be back, this time with outright comedy ‘‘Burn After Reading.’’</p>

<p>But at this early date, that hardly defines the field. Remember, at this time last year, no one had even heard of ‘‘Juno.’’</p>

<p><br />
<em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>MTV Movie Awards moving to Hollywood</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/06/mtv_movie_awards_moving_to_hol.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=10377" title="MTV Movie Awards moving to Hollywood" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.10377</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-23T17:11:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-23T17:13:20Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The MTV Video Music Awards are going Hollywood. After broadcasting from Las Vegas last year, the awards will air live from Paramount Pictures Studios in Los Angeles on Sept. 7, MTV announced today....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Other Awards" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The MTV Video Music Awards are going Hollywood.</p>

<p>After broadcasting from Las Vegas last year, the awards will air live from Paramount Pictures Studios in Los Angeles on Sept. 7, MTV announced today.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>MTV said it plans for the first time to enlist its Web-savvy, youthful audience to help decide the nominees.</p>

<p>The network intends to take over the movie studio’s lot and present the awards show from sound stages, rooftops and city streets. MTV and Paramount are corporate cousins within Viacom Inc.</p>

<p>‘‘With Paramount Pictures as the ideal setting, the glamour and musical heritage of L.A. are sure to be catalysts for creating explosive pop culture moments that the VMAs are known for,’’ Van Toffler, president of MTV Networks Music Group, said in a statement.</p>

<p>September’s VMAs — which will mark the show’s 25th year — has a tough act to follow after last year’s drama-filled extravaganza at the Palms Casino Resort.</p>

<p>The Vegas edition delivered one of the most-talked about performances in recent history: Britney Spears’ reviled comeback performance in which the pop star appeared nervous, out-of-shape and just plain out-of-it on stage.</p>

<p>There was also an off-camera fight between Pamela Anderson exes Kid Rock and Tommy Lee, and more divalike behavior from Kanye West, who threw a tantrum in front of media and crew backstage because he lost all five categories for which he was nominated. (Can anyone say ‘‘omg’’?)</p>

<p>It’s been a decade since MTV last televised the VMAs in Los Angeles. In recent years, the show has been presented from Miami and MTV’s home base of New York.</p>

<p>This year’s host, nominees and slate of performers will be announced at a later date.</p>

<p><br />
<em>AP</em><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>New rule limits Oscar song contenders to two per film</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/06/new_rule_limits_oscar_song_con.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=10347" title="New rule limits Oscar song contenders to two per film" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.10347</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-20T16:39:31Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-20T16:40:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last time around, the Oscar songs category was three times ‘‘Enchanted’’ — a trick that may never be repeated. The number of original songs that can be nominated from a single movie will now be limited to two, according to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last time around, the Oscar songs category was three times ‘‘Enchanted’’ — a trick that may never be repeated.</p>

<p>The number of original songs that can be nominated from a single movie will now be limited to two, according to a rule change by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The academy’s governors approved the change late Tuesday.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last year, Disney’s ‘‘Enchanted’’ had three titles in contention: ‘‘Happy Working Song,’’ ‘‘So Close’’ and ‘‘That’s How You Know.’’ The winner of best original song: ‘‘Falling Slowly,’’ from ‘‘Once.’’</p>

<p>The new rule would also have applied in 2007, when three songs from ‘‘Dreamgirls’’ were nominated. That year, the Oscar went to ‘‘I Need to Wake Up’’ from ‘‘An Inconvenient Truth.’’</p>

<p><br />
<em>AP</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Grammys dates announced</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/05/grammys_dates_announced.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=9679" title="Grammys dates announced" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.9679</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-21T17:09:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-21T17:12:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Recording Academy announced today the date for next year&apos;s Grammys: Feb. 8, 2009, airing live at 7 p.m. on CBS from L.A.&apos;s Staples Center. Nominees will be announced on Dec. 4. The eligibility period for nominations is Oct. 1,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Grammys" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Recording Academy announced today the date for next year's Grammys: Feb. 8, 2009, airing live at 7 p.m. on CBS from L.A.'s Staples Center.</p>

<p>Nominees will be announced on Dec. 4. The eligibility period for nominations is Oct. 1, 2007–Sept. 30, 2008.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Does &apos;Iron Man&apos; deserve Oscar gold?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/05/does_iron_man_deserve_an_oscar.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=9240" title="Does 'Iron Man' deserve Oscar gold?" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.9240</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-06T16:44:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-06T16:59:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Gwyneth Paltrow and Robert Downey Jr. make an appearance on MTV&apos;s &quot;Total Request Live&quot; to promote the movie. Dig Robert&apos;s pocket accessory. (Peter Kramer/AP) We went, we saw, we loved it. &quot;Iron Man&quot; is a triumph, finally making a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2295/2470548051_96d09224b5.jpg" width="500" height="330" alt="MTV TRL Gwyneth Paltrow Rob.jpg" /><br />
<b>Gwyneth Paltrow and Robert Downey Jr. make an appearance on MTV's "Total Request Live" to promote the movie. Dig Robert's pocket accessory.</b> <i>(Peter Kramer/AP)</i></p>

<p>We went, we saw, we loved it. "Iron Man" is a triumph, finally making a comic-book movie not seem so forced, so obligatory. We chalk it up to the great casting — <strong>Robert Downey Jr.</strong> (who we never tire of seeing described as "the best actor of his generation") and The Dude (a hardly recognizable <strong>Jeff Bridges</strong> playing a thankfully non-alien villain) — and, OK, <a href="javascript:void(window.open('http://defamer.com/387166/the-schlub-factor-and-four-other-reasons-iron-man-struck-box-office-gold','_blank','width=788,height=598,status=1,navigation=1,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,toolbar=1,location=1'));">the schlub factor</a>.</p>

<p>We also find it interesting that <a href="javascript:void(window.open('http://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2008/05/iron-man-oscar.html','_blank','width=788,height=598,status=1,navigation=1,scrollbars=1,resizable=1,toolbar=1,location=1'));">the Pop Watch bloggers at Entertainment Weekly have taken the populist stance</a> and called for the Academy to do some hard thinking — and consider Downey Jr. for an Oscar nomination. At the very least, it would be refreshing to have a slate of nominees from films the country — i.e., those same TV viewers you keep lamenting aren't watching the Oscars anymore, in droves — has actually seen.</p>

<p><strong>What do you think? Was "Iron Man" just good escapist fun, or is it deserving of the Ultimate Nod? </strong>Comment below...<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Golden Globes spinning early next year</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/04/golden_globes_spinning_early_n.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=8832" title="Golden Globes spinning early next year" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.8832</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-23T16:56:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-23T16:58:54Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Having been sidelined by the WGA strike this year, the Golden Globes are set to return next year on Sunday, Jan. 11. On Tuesday, the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. announced its key dates for its 66th annual awards. Nominations will...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Golden Globes" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Having been sidelined by the WGA strike this year, the Golden Globes are set to return next year on Sunday, Jan. 11.</p>

<p>On Tuesday, the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. announced its key dates for its 66th annual awards. Nominations will be announced at 5 a.m. Thursday, Dec. 11.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>And this after the Oscars <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/04/oscars_opt_to_give_new_preside.html">announced they'd delay nominee announcements</a> for the presidential inauguration.</p>

<p>Beginning in the early ’70s, the Globes traditionally were held in late January. But since the Academy Awards moved from March to late February in 2004, the Globes have been steadily inching closer toward the beginning of the year. Jan. 11 will be the earliest date yet for a Globes ceremony.</p>

<p>Still, the Globes presentation will not have much of an impact on the Oscar nomination process. Although the Academy’s nominations polls will close Jan. 12, a day after the Globes, most Academy voters will have mailed off their choices before the HFPA announces its winners at the NBC broadcast, once again set for the Beverly Hilton.</p>

<p>According to the HFPA calendar, nominations ballots will be mailed to the group’s membership Nov. 26. The final screening date for motion pictures is Dec. 6, putting pressure on those filmmakers who are finishing award hopefuls late in the year. Nomination ballots must be returned by Dec. 8.</p>

<p>Following the Dec. 11 announcement of the nominees, final ballots will be mailed Dec. 22 and are due by Jan. 7.</p>

<p><br />
<em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Oscars opt to give new president the Tuesday spotlight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/04/oscars_opt_to_give_new_preside.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=8537" title="Oscars opt to give new president the Tuesday spotlight" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.8537</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-14T19:02:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-14T20:03:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary>BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — What’s more significant: the inauguration of a new U.S. president or the announcement of the year’s Oscar nominees? The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences decided politics takes precedence, announcing today it has delayed the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — What’s more significant: the inauguration of a new U.S. president or the announcement of the year’s Oscar nominees? The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences decided politics takes precedence, announcing today it has delayed the nominations announcement by two days.</p>

<p>Oscar nominees are usually revealed on a Tuesday about four weeks before the big show, which is typically held the last Sunday in February. For 2009, though, the targeted Tuesday — Jan. 20 — is Inauguration Day.<br />
So the 81st annual Oscar nominees will be revealed Thursday, Jan. 22, and the Academy Awards will be presented Sunday, Feb. 22 — the earliest Oscars ever.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>‘‘It didn’t make any sense for us to try to compete with [the inauguration] from a news point of view,’’ academy Executive Administrator Ric Robertson said.</p>

<p>But the change will put the squeeze on the rest of the calendar, Robertson said.</p>

<p>‘‘Ballots are due Jan. 12, and nominations are announced 10 days later, so that’s getting pretty close to the minimum,’’ he said. ‘‘The most critical path is the balloting-voting process. Since we remain committed, for security reasons, to paper balloting, and all PricewaterhouseCoopers tabulating is done by hand, it’s not done by computers. ... They can turn things around quickly but they still need time.’’</p>

<p>Delaying the nominations also tightens production time for the Oscar telecast, since the show’s makeup depends largely on the nominees. Producers of the ceremony usually have four and a half weeks to prepare. In 2009, it will be one month to the day.</p>

<p>‘‘I know that whoever produces the show would like to have more time,’’ Robertson said, ‘‘and this will be two days less than they’ve had in past years.’’</p>

<p>The 2009 presidential inauguration isn’t the first event that prompted the academy to alter its calendar. The Oscar show was moved from the last Sunday in February in 2006 so it wouldn’t conflict with the closing ceremony of the Winter Olympics, Robertson said.</p>

<p>‘‘We have to look at other major global events,’’ he said.</p>

<p>The academy’s board of governors decided in 2004 to move the Oscar show from late March to late February to combat ‘‘awards fatigue’’ and ‘‘to maintain a higher level of interest and excitement,’’ Robertson said.</p>

<p>Key dates for the 2009 Academy Awards are:<br />
— Dec. 26, 2008: Nominations ballots mailed.<br />
— Jan. 12: Nominations ballots due.<br />
— Jan. 22: Nominees announced.<br />
— Jan. 28: Final ballots mailed.<br />
— Feb. 17: Final ballots due.<br />
— Feb. 22: 81st annual Academy Awards.</p>

<p><br />
<em>AP</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Nighty night, till the next show</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/03/nighty_night_till_the_next_sho.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7660" title="Nighty night, till the next show" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7660</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-10T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-10T18:27:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Another March, another spent Gold Rush. Now that the trophies are in the trophy cases, and we&apos;ve finally recovered from (whew) the Oscar Week that almost wasn&apos;t, we&apos;re putting the blog to bed till the next show. Thanks for all...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Another March, another spent Gold Rush.</p>

<p>Now that the trophies are in the trophy cases, and we've finally recovered from (whew) the Oscar Week that almost wasn't, we're putting the blog to bed till the next show. Thanks for all your eyes and input. See you soon!<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>ACM nominations: Chesney, Chesney, Chesney ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/03/acm_nominations_chesney_chesne.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7520" title="ACM nominations: Chesney, Chesney, Chesney ..." />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7520</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-04T18:08:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-04T18:12:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A complete list of the nominations announced today for the Academy of County Music awards:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Other Awards" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A complete list of the nominations announced today for the Academy of County Music awards:<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>ENTERTAINER OF THE YEAR <br />
 - Kenny Chesney<br />
 - Brad Paisley<br />
 - Rascal Flatts<br />
 - George Strait<br />
 - Keith Urban </p>

<p> TOP MALE VOCALIST <br />
 - Rodney Atkins<br />
 - Kenny Chesney<br />
 - Brad Paisley<br />
 - George Strait<br />
 - Keith Urban </p>

<p> TOP FEMALE VOCALIST <br />
 - Miranda Lambert<br />
 - Martina McBride<br />
 - LeAnn Rimes<br />
 - Taylor Swift<br />
 - Carrie Underwood </p>

<p> TOP VOCAL GROUP <br />
 - Diamond Rio<br />
 - Eagles<br />
 - Emerson Drive<br />
 - Little Big Town<br />
 - Rascal Flatts </p>

<p> TOP VOCAL DUO <br />
 - Big & Rich<br />
 - Brooks & Dunn<br />
 - Halfway To Hazard<br />
 - Montgomery Gentry<br />
 - Sugarland </p>

<p> TOP NEW MALE VOCALIST <br />
 - Luke Bryan<br />
 - Jack Ingram<br />
 - Jake Owen </p>

<p> TOP NEW FEMALE VOCALIST <br />
 - Sarah Buxton<br />
 - Kellie Pickler<br />
 - Taylor Swift </p>

<p> TOP NEW DUO OR VOCAL GROUP <br />
 - Carolina Rain<br />
 - Lady Antebellum<br />
 - The Wreckers </p>

<p>ALBUM OF THE YEAR<br />
- 5th Gear - Brad Paisley <br />
- Crazy Ex-Girlfriend - Miranda Lambert <br />
- Just Who I Am: Poets & Pirates - Kenny Chesney<br />
- If You're Going Through Hell - Rodney Atkins<br />
- Taylor Swift -Taylor Swift (Big Machine)</p>

<p>SINGLE RECORD OF THE YEAR<br />
- Don't Blink - Kenny Chesney<br />
- Famous In A Small Town - Miranda Lambert<br />
- Lost In This Moment - Big & Rich<br />
- Stay - Sugarland<br />
- Watching Airplanes - Gary Allan</p>

<p>SONG OF THE YEAR<br />
- Don't Blink - Kenny Chesney<br />
- Lost In This Moment - Big & Rich<br />
- Moments - Emerson Drive<br />
- Watching You - Rodney Atkins<br />
- Stay - Sugarland</p>

<p>VIDEO OF THE YEAR<br />
- Don't Blink - Kenny Chesney<br />
- Lost In This Moment - Big & Rich<br />
- Online - Brad Paisley<br />
- Stay - Sugarland<br />
- Watching You - Rodney Atkins</p>

<p>VOCAL EVENT OF THE YEAR<br />
- Because Of You - Reba McEntire Duet With Kelly Clarkson<br />
- Find Out Who Your Friends Are - Tracy Lawrence With Tim McGraw and Kenny Chesney <br />
- Shiftwork - Kenny Chesney Duet With George Strait<br />
- Till We Ain't Strangers Anymore - Bon Jovi Featuring LeAnn Rimes<br />
- What You Give Away - Vince Gill With Sheryl Crow</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Diablo Cody: I wasn&apos;t crying. Not me ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/02/diablo_cody_i_wasnt_crying_not.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7332" title="Diablo Cody: I wasn't crying. Not me ..." />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7332</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-28T23:30:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T23:32:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Diablo Cody, the Chicago-area ex-stripper who just won an Oscar for writing &quot;Juno,&quot; is now a columnist for Entertainment Weekly magazine. In her latest missive, she sets the record straight about crying during her acceptance speech: “I get something stuck...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Diablo Cody</strong>, the Chicago-area ex-stripper who just won an Oscar for writing "Juno," is now a columnist for Entertainment Weekly magazine. In her latest missive, she sets the record straight about crying during her acceptance speech: “I get something stuck in my eye and am widely misinterpreted as weeping.  Yeah, like I would cry in that situation.  You punks obviously don’t know me.  I’m tough.  I would never break into ragged sobs on live television, and I would also never run off stage immediately afterward and blubber in front of the entire production crew and Helen Mirren."<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Jessica Alba at Oscars: I&apos;ll tumble for ya ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/02/jessica_alba_at_oscars_ill_tum.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7326" title="Jessica Alba at Oscars: I'll tumble for ya ..." />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7326</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-28T21:03:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T21:06:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Much was made of the fact that several actresses at the Oscars were sporting baby bumps. Jessica Alba, however, was threatened by a real bump....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Much was made of the fact that several actresses at the Oscars were sporting baby bumps. <strong>Jessica Alba,</strong> however, was threatened by a real bump.<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Alba is more than six months pregnant, and she fell while backstage at the Oscars on Sunday. She tripped and was caught by fiancee <strong>Cash Warren</strong>.</p>

<p>She writes online: "I did have a stumble backstage outside of the green room. Cash caught one arm, the other hit the floor. Luckily all the photogs were taking pics of <strong>Cameron D</strong>."</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Academy head cops to evolving movie industry, Oscars</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/02/academy_head_cops_to_evolving.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7322" title="Academy head cops to evolving movie industry, Oscars" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7322</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-28T19:29:03Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T19:32:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Entertainment Weekly interviewed Bruce Davis, executive director of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, following the news of the dismally low ratings for Sunday&apos;s Oscars. He acknowledges that a majority of the traditional viewers simply didn&apos;t tune in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Entertainment Weekly interviewed Bruce Davis, executive director of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, following the news of the dismally low ratings for Sunday's Oscars. He acknowledges that a majority of the traditional viewers simply didn't tune in at all this year, and instead of casting blame to elements of the show or the writers strike, he concedes that, in the movie industry of the future, the Oscars may naturally be a smaller affair.</p>

<p>"Some of these movies are just too difficult for a mass audience, frankly," Davis says. "And if we have moved into an era where there's this dichotomy between big popular studio movies and smaller pictures for more specialized audiences, we may just have to get used to smaller audiences [for the Oscar telecast.] This could be a one-year blip but it doesn't look like one. It looks like something that has been developing over the past few years. It's as if the National Book Awards had to make a choice between giving awards to very serious fiction or to the most popular bestsellers. We've come to that point where there are two kinds of movies, and we're focusing on the ones which, almost by definition, aren't going to be blockbusters."<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Next year, Oscar should beef up online content</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/02/next_year_oscar_should_beef_up.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7320" title="Next year, Oscar should beef up online content" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7320</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-28T19:19:42Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-28T19:21:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>ABC’s broadcast of the 80th annual Academy Awards hit a ratings low with only 32 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media. Though Oscar ratings are often directly related to the popularity of the nominated films (and this year’s bunch were...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p>ABC’s broadcast of the 80th annual Academy Awards hit a ratings low with only 32 million viewers, according to Nielsen Media. Though Oscar ratings are often directly related to the popularity of the nominated films (and this year’s bunch were not box office sensations), many are calling for the academy to retool its broadcast. One of the first things the Oscars should re-examine is its <a href=http://www.oscar.com>Web site</a>.</p>

<p>Studios now regularly promote their movies on the Web, (the success this winter of ‘‘Cloverfield’’ was partly based on a viral ad campaign). And the writers strike — which was primarily over revenue from material played online — proved just how much Hollywood is fixated on the Web. So why during its biggest night would Hollywood shun the Internet?<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
While thousands blog through the evening, all Oscar.com offers are videos from its ‘‘Thank You Cam.’’ A feature begun last year, it allows winners to elongate their lists of gratitude, so often cut short on stage. Oscar.com might better entice viewers by providing a more substantial behind-the-scenes perspective.</p>

<p><em>AP</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Oscars to Whoopi: We&apos;re sorry!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/2008/02/oscars_to_whoopi_were_sorry.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=40/entry_id=7299" title="Oscars to Whoopi: We're sorry!" />
    <id>tag:blogs.suntimes.com,2008:/awards//40.7299</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-27T22:04:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-27T22:05:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Whoopi Goldberg has accepted an apology from producer Gil Cates for not including her in a montage featuring Oscar hosts during Sunday’s Academy Awards telecast. Cates called her Tuesday and ‘‘talked about the fact that he had made an oversight,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Conner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Oscars" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.suntimes.com/awards/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Whoopi Goldberg</strong> has accepted an apology from producer <strong>Gil Cates</strong> for not including her in a montage featuring Oscar hosts during Sunday’s Academy Awards telecast.</p>

<p>Cates called her Tuesday and ‘‘talked about the fact that he had made an oversight, pure and simple. He said, ‘You know I love you,’’’ Goldberg said today on ABC daytime talk show ‘‘The View.’’<br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Goldberg, who called Cates a ‘‘great gentleman,’’ accepted his apology.</p>

<p>She said she has ‘‘moved on’’ since choking up on Monday’s show when her fellow co-hosts discussed how she was left out of the clip.</p>

<p>The 52-year-old actress-comedian hosted the Oscars in 1994, 1996, 1999 and 2002.</p>

<p><br />
<em>AP</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

