Critics' awards are for the critics, not the films

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Time movie critic Richard Corliss just posted an insightful examination of the motivation behind the critics' awards in LA and NY and beyond. Despite the headline, "Do Film Critics Know Anything?," it's not another marginalization of arts critics. "By the time I'd got back to my office, I had realized that we critics may give these awards to the winners, but we give them for ourselves," he writes. "In fact, we're essentially passing notes to one another, admiring our connoisseurship at the risk of ignoring the vast audience that sees movies and the smaller one that reads us."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Critics' awards are for the critics, not the films.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Leave a comment

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Awards calendar

Your complete calendar of upcoming entertainment awards shows and other related events! To mark your calendar, click here.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Thomas Conner published on December 11, 2007 11:35 AM.

Looking at the Golden Globes' signs and sins was the previous entry in this blog.

On the Oscars' red carpet: It's Regis! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.